Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for APatch Updates

Channel

APatch Updates

@APatchChannel

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

24,857subscribers

+113 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002145151752
TypeChannel
Username@APatchChannel
DescriptionOfficial Update channel of APatch.
Created9 January 2024measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 August 2026
Measurements held11
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/APatchChannel

Growth

24,74424,86624,8056 August 2026 — 24,744 subscribers7 August 2026 — 24,749 subscribers8 August 2026 — 24,765 subscribers9 August 2026 — 24,776 subscribers10 August 2026 — 24,790 subscribers11 August 2026 — 24,799 subscribers12 August 2026 — 24,817 subscribers14 August 2026 — 24,835 subscribers15 August 2026 — 24,850 subscribers16 August 2026 — 24,866 subscribers17 August 2026 — 24,857 subscribers24,8576 August 202617 August 2026
11 measurements spanning 11 days, net +113. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 24,726–24,884 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Aug 2026, 20:2624,857-9
16 Aug 2026, 20:5724,866+16
15 Aug 2026, 12:5324,850+15
14 Aug 2026, 00:3724,835+18
12 Aug 2026, 17:3424,817+18
11 Aug 2026, 13:5724,799+9
10 Aug 2026, 16:0124,790+14
9 Aug 2026, 15:1124,776+11
8 Aug 2026, 16:5324,765+16
7 Aug 2026, 13:3024,749+5
6 Aug 2026, 23:3124,744first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 9 January 2024the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 26 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
33.2%
avg views ÷ 24,857 subscribers
Avg views / post
8,260
1 post measured
Reaction rate
1.37%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 18 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held18 (9 January 20246 August 2026)
Views total8,260
Reactions total113
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken18 Aug 2026, 02:17 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
1
Links
10

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 18 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

4,077 reactions across 17 posts, in 32 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1,60739.4%
👍1,20129.5%
🔥47311.6%
👏1694.15%
🎉1333.26%
👎551.35%
🤯531.30%
😐481.18%
💯350.858%
👾310.76%
🤝300.736%
🫡290.711%
💊230.564%
🤗210.515%
🤔200.491%
🤓190.466%
180.442%
❤‍🔥180.442%
🌚150.368%
🆒140.343%
12 further kinds651.59%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,077reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 9 January 2024 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 15:44 UTC≈8,260 views113 reactionsread 18 August 2026

由于长时间没有发布release,我们正在快速修复一些bug,新版本需要元模块对模块进行挂载,我们将旧版本的挂载分离为单独的模块你可以仍然使用旧版挂载来保持与旧版挂载一致( https://github.com/AndroidPatch/magic_mount ), 不过你也可以选择其他的元模块获得更好的体验,参照网站的说明 https://apatch.dev/meta-module.html ,如果有问题请先升级到nightly版本,仍有问题请提交issue。 ------------------- For long time no release , we are quikly fix bugs, the latest version need meta module to mount module, https://github.com/AndroidPatch/magic_mount 。 you can also

91👎7😐6👍3🤓3🌚1👏1😢1

16 Feb 2026, 13:00 UTC≈47,200 views515 reactionsread 18 August 2026

春节快乐🎆🎉~ Happy Chinese New Year‌!

🔥311🎉7857👍23😐17👎10🗿5👾4

4 Dec 2025, 17:12 UTC≈69,800 views381 reactionsread 18 August 2026

Due to increasingly aggressive root detection, we aim to move as much capability of the root manager as possible into modules. The original shell-script-based workflow has become too simple and can no longer meet the needs of module development. We are now introducing a new scripting system: by adding Lua scripts, you can call Rust or even C directly from Lua. This allows Lua to invoke system calls, and you can also

279👍32🫡22🔥139👎8🤗6❤‍🔥4

12 Nov 2025, 09:40 UTC≈85,800 views359 reactionsread 18 August 2026
File

Support kernel 6.12 and fix many bugs.... 👉 Report bug or feature request: https://github.com/bmax121/APatch/issues/new/choose 👉 @APatchChannel

260👏25👍18👎15🤯14🔥8😍6😎4

7 Jul 2025, 11:28 UTC≈118,000 views520 reactionsread 18 August 2026
File

🎉 New APatch release 11107 is available 🎉 Changelog Fix Linux 6.1 / 6.6 support (by NepXin) Bump KernelPatch to 0.12.0 Refactor apjni Upgrade dependences Fix exclude toggle Merge translation Add Lite Mode and Force OverlayFS feature Fix several bug, improve stability Some minor changes 👉 Report bug or feature request: https://github.com/bmax121/APatch/issues/new/choose 👉 @APatchChannel

383🔥32🤯30👎15👏13🎉12🤝9💊8

13 Feb 2025, 09:23 UTC≈131,000 views555 reactionsread 18 August 2026
File

🎉 New APatch release 11039 is available 🎉 Changelog Upgraded KernelPatch to version 0.11.2 Upgraded Gradle and Rust dependencies Allocated new PTY in APD instead of allowing SELinux policy Shrink Manager app size Updated Resetprop and MagiskBoot tools Fixed A/B OTA boot marker issue Resolved UID mismatch after package list changes Switched to Magic Mount instead of OverlayFS Imported translations – special thanks to

321👍130🎉25🔥19👏17🤔13🌚9🤯9

2 May 2024, 03:08 UTC≈173,000 views714 reactionsread 18 August 2026
File

🎉 New APatch release 10763 is available 🎉 Changelog Upgrade KernelPatch to 0.10.7 Upgrade java and rust dependences Fix compat syscall, 32-bits su command is supported now Shrink apd size Remove buggy and redundant hide manager feature Re-designed About and Module Screen UI, thanks to SanmerDev MRepo's design Fix os error 2 during installing modules Switch to new enableEdgeToEdge, drop accompanist/systemuicontroller

👍52587🔥28😐15🎉13💊10💯8🤗8

4 Apr 2024, 11:00 UTC≈136,000 views263 reactionsread 18 August 2026
File

🎉 New APatch release available 🎉 Upgrade KernelPatch to 0.10.5 Strip busybox so that APatch's size decreased New refreshed UI Introduce theme manager and custom dark mode switch Switch to stable compose dependence release Fix settings page not scrollable Enhanced Image flashing operations Optimize InstallScreen experience Refine dialog component and add an animation to UpdateCard Enable blur behind compose dialog fo

👍124👏8327🔥9❤‍🔥5💯5🌚3🤝3

18 Mar 2024, 14:43 UTC≈72,800 views122 reactionsread 18 August 2026

Due to previous mistakes, both the group and the original management have been disbanded. We are now discussing the combination and merging into the same group, and all management personnel have been changed to developers. We do not want any unpleasant things to happen again and would like to join a new group, https://t.me/apatch_discuss

👍839😁7🤝6🤗5❤‍🔥3👏3💊2

Signed 一抹清酒 __name__

18 Mar 2024, 00:12 UTC≈62,900 views94 reactionsread 18 August 2026
File

10569 1. Fix find kallsyms_marker error (For example: OnePlus 12 with kernel 6.1.57 and etc) 2. Try to fix module install os error 22 or 5, but not 100% guaranteed.

🔥42👍298👏8😐4🆒3

Signed bmax

17 Mar 2024, 11:50 UTC≈60,400 views49 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

👾27🤔6👍5💯3🤝3🤨3👏2

Signed bmax

17 Mar 2024, 11:49 UTC≈66,700 views74 reactionsread 18 August 2026

I just noticed APatchLite, and this is not directed at APatchLite specifically. APatchLite is guaranteed to be safe as it is a version forked by a developer of the APatch app. However, there is an issue: the superkey is embedded in the source code, and it is not advisable to skip the setting of the superkey.

45👍16🤓6❤‍🔥2🌚2🤝2🤗1

Signed bmax

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @APatchChannel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 302,676 of 1,548,671entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“APatch Updates” (@APatchChannel), 24,857 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/APatchChannel.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.