Sticker, posted without a caption

Channel
🚹 #REALOUSH.SITE!
@Realoush
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
4,399subscribers
+413 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002117275490 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Realoush |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 27 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 14 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 27 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Realoush |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 13 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 76% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 27 Sept 2026, 06:40 | 4,399 | +62 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 06:56 | 4,337 | +36 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 08:55 | 4,301 | +37 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 12:38 | 4,264 | +34 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 22:14 | 4,230 | +11 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 12:48 | 4,219 | +13 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 18:39 | 4,206 | +27 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 20:24 | 4,179 | +35 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 03:11 | 4,144 | +30 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 10:37 | 4,114 | +20 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 01:18 | 4,094 | +37 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 04:57 | 4,057 | +58 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 21:36 | 3,999 | +13 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 22:46 | 3,986 | first reading |
Engagement
17 posts held, back to 6 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 4 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 2 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
215 reactions across 6 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 63 | 29.3% | |
| ❤🔥 | 59 | 27.4% | |
| ❤ | 33 | 15.3% | |
| 😍 | 17 | 7.91% | |
| ⚡ | 15 | 6.98% | |
| 🥰 | 13 | 6.05% | |
| 🕊 | 8 | 3.72% | |
| 💋 | 7 | 3.26% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 215 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 6 June 2026 to 2 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
⚠️ WARNING, @PROFILFESS: Kalau masih bingung result kamu masih janggal, kenapa harus muter muter? Perlu di bisikin dikit gaa nih? jadi gini, kita habis ngeluarin profil base pada tanggal 03/08/26 nih. Yaitu sebuah base yang bakal nemenin segala hal tentang profile needs kalian. Btw kalian disini juga bisa berkembang, saling bantu, berbagi pengalaman, sampai ketemu teman baru. Kalian bisa dateng kesini untuk meminta…
typograhpy arabic gitu mau ga guys?
🔥26
Sticker, posted without a caption
ㅤ 🝏 A CAVE DWELT BY SOMBER (#AnteDefeatism) / 20-22. It’s quite knotty to borrow a place of someone who has never been befallen by mischief—and no one could convey me salvation or even unfeigned prayers. If flooding ARABIC in despair is the state to grapple, then I’m a mistaken one. I’ll remain astray until the thorns bind my sanity, or maybe just rely on the ripped wits that can make a…
❤🔥48🔥26❤15⚡10🕊8💋7😍7🥰6
ekhemm
❤7🥰7😍6❤🔥5
Sticker, posted without a caption
Hati-hati sama @Herehata, dia penipu bukpem palsu. Ngakunya mau beli ton/gram dan udah SS bukpem, taunya malah minta duit ngakakakak Ini addressnya: UQB1sZ8B4sFe7lFLaO_XF4YbyzalLmcJngmVECTjVA-KPhhD Ini detail akunnya: 👤 2094004284 👦🏻 Endrank 🌐 @Herehata 🇮🇩 Indonesian 🕑 Updated at 26/06/2026
Sticker, posted without a caption
betul, untuk credit boleh di channel archive yaa sender nim.
Sticker, posted without a caption
jangan lupa join kedua class ini, cocok buat lu pada yang mau belajar design dan realism. -R
❤3
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @Realoush. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 23 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
@alsaeraa · 11,7925 postsGyuvault, Joe.
@Gyuvault · 19,0284 posts𝙅𝘼𝙎𝘼 𝙅𝙊𝙆𝙄 𝙋𝙄𝙉𝙅𝙊𝙇 𝙂𝘼𝙇𝘽𝘼𝙔 𝙊𝙁𝙁𝙄𝘾𝙄𝘼𝙇
@leurreicy · 14,4754 postsTROVEERT
@Troveert · 15,5434 postslouriette – s archive ୨୧
@louriettes · 163 postsaiya—lovyaey
@lovyaey · 2,1323 postscredits
@AERlND · 11 postearpost archive.
@archivearpost · 21 postmay creations
@artemwooo · 341 postArsip.
@Avrsip · 51 postarsip @BloemTale
@blotalearchive · 51 post@Lumerw special thanks for
@camatk · 21 postarchive
@envoleri · 21 postlys little st🩷ry.
@loveyourselfmost · 11 post✿ ˚ . mostyre! ◌.⛄🌌
@mostyre · 3,1141 postㅤ﹫ Muythical. ♥️
@Muythical · 2,3711 postIni Result
@resultmanmut · 11 postunknown
@statesupd · 131 postSteezity Archive
@SteezityArchive · 151 post⋆୨ stylisher
@stylisher · 231 postArchive .&) Sweetiespyu..
@Sweetiespyuu · 481 post33 Archive 🩵
@ThirtyChive · 21 poststore @cazzserbaserbi
@xkereta · 21 post
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 1
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@Realoush named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“🚹 #REALOUSH.SITE!” (@Realoush), 4,399 subscribers as measured 27 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Realoush.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.