Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

اقرب من الطب وغنيله²🔰

@Med_Is_Fun2

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Polls · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

1,738subscribers

-5 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001719823144
TypeChannel
Username@Med_Is_Fun2
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Med_Is_Fun2

Growth

1,7381,7431,740.56 August 2026 — 1,743 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,742 subscribers9 August 2026 — 1,738 subscribers6 August 20269 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 3 days, net -5. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,737–1,744 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Aug 2026, 19:511,738-4
7 Aug 2026, 02:071,742-1
6 Aug 2026, 19:311,743first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 12 February 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
11.5%
avg views ÷ 1,738 subscribers
Avg views / post
201
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
2
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 August 2026
Posts held20 (12 February 20253 August 2026)
Views total401
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 17:38 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Recent posts

3 Aug 2026, 15:22 UTC158 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

محاور بداية الدورة الجديدة في الطوارئ لمن أراد التسجيل والالتحاق بالدورة التواصل على .. @MbnHuda1 أو عبر البوت : @MMGh7_bot أو عبر الواتساب : +967775979004 قناة لابكوت الطبية : https://t.me/+e5e2SA4VJUs3NGZk

Signed Moh'd F AL-Ghazali.

31 Jul 2026, 04:39 UTC243 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @Labcoat88

السلام عليكم وصباح الخير جمعة طيبة مباركة الدورة التدريبية مستمرة حيث سيتم شرح كل مواضيع الطوارئ والأمراض الشائعة ومناقشة حالات حقيقية ومناقشة الأدوية العلمية والتجارية لمن أراد الإلتحاق بالدورة التدريبية التواصل على @MbnHuda1 أو @MMGh7_bot أو عبر الواتساب +967775979004 مع العلم أن الجمعة تخفيض سعر الدورة لـ 1500 ريال.

Signed Moh'd F AL-Ghazali.

17 Nov 2025, 22:32 UTCviews —

اقرب من الطب وغنيله²🔰 pinned «انضموا للقناة الجديده https://t.me/med_is_funnest»

17 Nov 2025, 22:29 UTC≈1,450 viewsread 7 August 2026

انضموا للقناة الجديده https://t.me/med_is_funnest

1 Nov 2025, 18:52 UTC≈1,660 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Very important...🤓 #صندوق-مكافحة-السرطان #طبيب_ذماري

Signed فَهْمٓــــــيٌ'

20 Aug 2025, 18:36 UTC≈4,250 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Pancytopenia evaluation...🤓 #طبيب_ذماري

Signed فَهْمٓــــــيٌ'

21 May 2025, 10:19 UTC≈2,090 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @MFGDoctor28

انشروا هذا الرابط .. https://t.me/+fT2T6V-mBBQ0ZjBk

Signed Moh'd F AL-Ghazali

22 Mar 2025, 02:01 UTC≈2,680 viewsread 7 August 2026
Poll

All of the following are signs of the base of skull fracture except.....

  1. Raccoon eyes11%
  2. Battle sign15%
  3. CSF leak11%
  4. Fox sign63%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Signed Its_dollar

22 Mar 2025, 02:01 UTC≈3,090 viewsread 7 August 2026
Poll

The first reflex to reappear after spinal shock is ....

  1. Cremasteric reflex19%
  2. Bulbocavernosus reflex36%
  3. Knee jerk28%
  4. Abdominal reflex17%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Signed Its_dollar

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Med_Is_Fun2. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

22 Mar 2025, 02:01 UTCAnonymous Quiz201 voters

All of the following are signs of the base of skull fracture except.....

  1. Raccoon eyes11%
  2. Battle sign15%
  3. CSF leak11%
  4. Fox sign63%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

22 Mar 2025, 02:01 UTCAnonymous Quiz210 voters

The first reflex to reappear after spinal shock is ....

  1. Cremasteric reflex19%
  2. Bulbocavernosus reflex36%
  3. Knee jerk28%
  4. Abdominal reflex17%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 12 February 2025 to 3 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,105,055 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

الجراحة 💊| Surgery 🔪 - Crypto currency
@no1_oone · 313,896
Telegram ranks this channel #79 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 10 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“اقرب من الطب وغنيله²🔰” (@Med_Is_Fun2), 1,738 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Med_Is_Fun2.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.