Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ⚡️Mahdi Abshahi⚡️

Channel

⚡️Mahdi Abshahi⚡️

@mahdiabshahi

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

37,809subscribers

+1,432 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001443794499
TypeChannel
Username@mahdiabshahi
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded12 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/mahdiabshahi

Growth

36,36937,80937,08912 August 2026 — 36,377 subscribers13 August 2026 — 36,369 subscribers14 August 2026 — 36,482 subscribers16 August 2026 — 36,572 subscribers17 August 2026 — 37,809 subscribers12 August 202617 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 5 days, net +1,432. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 36,153–38,025 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Aug 2026, 17:5937,809+1,237
16 Aug 2026, 14:2336,572+90
14 Aug 2026, 20:3436,482+113
13 Aug 2026, 08:5336,369-8
12 Aug 2026, 23:4736,377first reading

Engagement

52 posts held, back to 12 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 9 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
24.0%
avg views ÷ 37,809 subscribers
Avg views / post
9,090
52 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.28%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
52
of 52 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 17 August 2026
Posts held52 (12 August 202617 August 2026)
Views total472,650
Reactions total15,516
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken17 Aug 2026, 12:29 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
3m 16s
Average length
1m 05s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

15,516 reactions across 52 posts, in 38 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 70.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
10,97170.7%
💔1,95212.6%
8495.47%
🔥7805.03%
👏2271.46%
😭1220.786%
👻890.574%
😁850.548%
😎710.458%
💘460.296%
😢370.238%
❤‍🔥320.206%
😱230.148%
👌220.142%
😍210.135%
🦄210.135%
🫡190.122%
🤷‍♂170.11%
🤩130.084%
🆒120.077%
18 further kinds1070.69%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 52 of the 52 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 15,516reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 52 most recent posts we hold, published 12 August 2026 to 17 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
4
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 52 we hold a reading for · 4%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @mahdiabshahi. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 52 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 12 August 2026 to 17 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

17 Aug 2026, 01:28 UTC≈17,500 views809 reactionsread 17 August 2026

تو عزیز منی رفیقمی هرچیم بگی بهم دوستدارمو هیچوقت بخاطر یه حرف رفیقمو دور نمیندازم من تند رفتم هم پرایوت عذرخواهی کردم هم اینجا باز میگم رفیق دلی منی از اولش اولین رفیق بودی الانم هستی ببخشید عشق داداش♥️🫂

748❤‍🔥25😍19👏8🫡4🐳3🤝1😭1

17 Aug 2026, 01:26 UTC≈4,320 views550 reactionsread 17 August 2026
Forwarded from @Samsnowww

من مشکلی با مهدی پس ندارم با اینکه دلخور شدم اما صحبت کردیم و حل شد 🫶🏻❤️

543👏5❤‍🔥1😭1

17 Aug 2026, 00:18 UTC≈4,640 views514 reactionsread 17 August 2026
Forwarded from @Samsnowww

مهدی پس بهت خیر رسونده دهنتو ببند

490🔥7👏5💔52💘2😈2😭1

16 Aug 2026, 23:25 UTC≈12,100 views286 reactionsread 17 August 2026
Voice message

Voice message, posted without a caption

265💔10👏8💘3

16 Aug 2026, 23:11 UTC≈12,100 views402 reactionsread 17 August 2026

احترام رفیقامو همیشه همه جا حتی تو دلخوری نگه داشتم ببخشید زیاد حرف زدم ولی خیلی جنگیدم برای این اکیپ من هیچ مشکلی ندارم همین فردا با فلیم صحبت کنم چرا که تا الان ۲ بار گفتم ب سهیل بیاین صحیت کنیم و نیومدن کینگ و کویین عزیز ببخشید من تا حسین چیزی نگفت بخاطر حرمتا هیچ جایی حرفی نزدم حتی تو این دعوا هم طرف سهیلو گرفتم♥️

3825💔5👏3💘3🔥3🙏1

16 Aug 2026, 23:08 UTC≈11,900 views331 reactionsread 17 August 2026
Voice message

Voice message, posted without a caption

312👏12💔7

16 Aug 2026, 23:04 UTC≈11,900 views325 reactionsread 17 August 2026
Voice message

Voice message, posted without a caption

300👏13💔8💘2🔥2

16 Aug 2026, 23:03 UTC≈11,800 views336 reactionsread 17 August 2026
Voice message

Voice message, posted without a caption

309💔12👏10💘2🔥2🫡1

16 Aug 2026, 23:03 UTC≈11,700 views332 reactionsread 17 August 2026
Voice message

Voice message, posted without a caption

306👏13💔7👀2🔥2🍾1💘1

16 Aug 2026, 23:03 UTC≈11,500 views342 reactionsread 17 August 2026
Voice message

Voice message, posted without a caption

310💔14👏11💘6🔥1

16 Aug 2026, 23:03 UTC≈11,300 views390 reactionsread 17 August 2026
Voice message

Voice message, posted without a caption

355👏14💘10😁5😱3🔥2👌1

16 Aug 2026, 23:03 UTC≈11,000 views368 reactionsread 17 August 2026
Voice message

Voice message, posted without a caption

342👏10💘8🔥3🍾2😁2🆒1

Showing the 12 most recent of 52 posts we hold for @mahdiabshahi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 658,142 of 1,480,975entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

بنیامین
@Thebeniamin · 141,604
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 13 August 2026
سهیل سلبا
@solbasoheil · 149,662
Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 12 August 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“⚡️Mahdi Abshahi⚡️” (@mahdiabshahi), 37,809 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mahdiabshahi.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.