International news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 59% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Content that also appears on other registered channels
Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 12 other registered channels. This entry also sits inside a group of 20 channels linked by matching posts, directly or through other channels in the group; two members of the group may share no posts with each other. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 227 of the 230 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 323 comparable posts for this entry, running 2 August 2026 to 13 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).
Of the group of 20 channels, the one whose matching posts we hold earliest is @idf_telegram. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
Recorded under the keys clone_copy · clone_mutual · clone_source, last confirmed 14 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Channels linked by matching posts
This channel is in a group of 20 registered channels linked by matching posts, directly or through other channels in the group. This channel may share no posts with some of the channels listed below, and listed channels may share none with each other. Links are found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown in this list. “First” could only mean first in our own crawl, which depends on how deep we happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. Our one hand-check read 45 of the highest-confidence flagged pairs against the live Telegram pages. In 18 of them the live page showed a “Forwarded from” credit that our database had no record of, so reading that pair as an unattributed copy was wrong; the check did not measure who published first. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Near-verbatim matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
64 measurements spanning 98 days, net -645. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 27,304–28,143 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 64
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
11 Nov 2026, 21:56
27,401
-15
10 Nov 2026, 00:17
27,416
-8
8 Nov 2026, 16:08
27,424
-8
7 Nov 2026, 09:34
27,432
-2
6 Nov 2026, 10:35
27,434
-5
5 Nov 2026, 13:10
27,439
-4
4 Nov 2026, 13:56
27,443
-7
3 Nov 2026, 11:37
27,450
-7
2 Nov 2026, 08:10
27,457
-5
1 Nov 2026, 04:50
27,462
-7
31 Oct 2026, 01:49
27,469
-7
30 Oct 2026, 04:11
27,476
-5
29 Oct 2026, 02:36
27,481
-6
28 Oct 2026, 02:31
27,487
-5
27 Oct 2026, 05:09
27,492
-1
26 Oct 2026, 05:27
27,493
-5
25 Oct 2026, 06:00
27,498
-4
24 Oct 2026, 06:46
27,502
-1
23 Oct 2026, 07:35
27,503
-6
22 Oct 2026, 05:07
27,509
first reading
Engagement
447 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 160 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
14.7%
avg views ÷ 27,401 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,030
82 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.449%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
82
of 447 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 November 2026
Posts held
447 (2 August 2026 – 13 November 2026)
Views total
330,060
Reactions total
1,483
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
14 Nov 2026, 15:21 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈13,100
Videos
≈5,210
Links
≈2,920
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
16m 49s
Average length
18s
Measured directly from 56 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
7,690 reactions across 440 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 23.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
1,793
23.3%
👍
1,451
18.9%
🔥
1,266
16.5%
🤣
628
8.17%
💔
510
6.63%
🤬
340
4.42%
👏
331
4.30%
😱
223
2.90%
😁
222
2.89%
😢
200
2.60%
🤔
177
2.30%
🥴
150
1.95%
👌
114
1.48%
🙏
99
1.29%
🫡
78
1.01%
👎
66
0.858%
🤨
42
0.546%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 445 of the 447 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 7,789 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 447 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 13 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 11 of 82 posts held from the last 30 days (13.4%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
בעקבות שיבושי תדרים "חריגים": סוכנות התעופה הפדרלית של ארה"ב (FAA) הכריזה על קרקוע מלא של כל המטוסים שנמצאים על הקרקע בארה"ב.
המשמעות: נעצרו כלל ההמראות מארה"ב, אך נכון לכרגע כן יש נחיתות, של טיסות בינלאומיות בלבד.
על פי הדיווחים, מדובר בשיבושי תדרים נרחבים שהחלו בצפון ארה"ב, והתפשטו במהרה ליתר ארה"ב. על פי הדיווחים, השיבושים משפיעים גם על לוויני מזג האוויר של השירות המטאורולוגי של ארה"ב.
הרשויות בארה"ב חוקרות את מ…
דובר חיל האוויר האמריקאי מעדכן: "הערב הגיבו כוחות האבטחה של חיל האוויר האמריקאי לפעילות חשודה של כטב"ם בלתי מורשה מעל בסיס חיל האוויר המלכותי לייקנהית׳. אף איש מהצוות, כלי הטיס או התשתיות לא נפגע״
האזעקות הופעלו בבסיסים הבריטים לייקנהית', מילדנהול ופלטוול - וכעת נמצאים תחת הסגר.
מוקדם יותר השבוע דווח בכלי תקשורת שונים כי פיקוד אירופה של צבא ארצות הברית העלה את רמת הכוננות הביטחונית לדרגת "צ'רלי" בשני בסיסים בהם נשמעו אזעקות - לייקנהית' ומילדנהול - בעקבות התרעה מודיעינית הקשורה לאיראן.
הודעה משותפת לדובר צה"ל ודוברות שב"כ:
צה"ל ושב"כ חיסלו לאורך השבוע יותר מ-10 מחבלים ברצועת עזה והשמידו סדנה לייצור אמצעי לחימה: חלק מהמחבלים פשטו לישראל בטבח 7 באוקטובר
במספר תקיפות ברחבי רצועת עזה לאורך השבוע החולף, צה"ל ושב"כ חיסלו יותר מ-10 מחבלים שקידמו מתווי טרור נגד כוחות צה"ל ואזרחי מדינת ישראל ופעלו לשיקום יכולות ארגון הטרור חמאס, תוך הפרה שיטתית של הפסקת האש.
בין המחבלים שחוסלו:
• מחמד עטא זכי קישאוי, מחב…
פיקוד מרכז של צבא ארה״ב מעדכן כי שני כטב״מים איראנים הופלו כשהיו בדרכם לבחריין
מוקדם יותר היום, משמרות המהפכה טענו כי תקפו מכ״ם אמריקני באי לחופי בחריין. פיקוד מרכז האמריקני מכחיש זאת
דובר צה"ל:
חיזוק השותפות הימית בין ישראל לארצות הברית: מפקד הצי החמישי האמריקאי ביקר בישראל
מפקד הצי החמישי בפיקוד המרכז האמריקאי, תת אדמירל קורט ראנשו, סיים היום את ביקורו בישראל, כאורחו של מפקד זרוע הים, האלוף אייל הראל
במהלך הביקור נפגש עם מפקד זרוע הים, האלוף אייל הראל ועם הפיקוד הבכיר של הזרוע. המפקדים דנו בפעילות זרוע הים במהלך הלחימה בזירות השונות, חיזוק השותפות עבור שמירת יציבות האזור וביטחון נתיבי השייט, …
צה"ל ושב"כ מאשרים את הפרסום:
בתקיפה ממוקדת במהלך הלילה (ה'), צה"ל ושב"כ תקפו את המחבל מחמד אבו איסמעיל ששימש כמפקד חטיבת חאן יונס ומחבלים נוספים שהסתתרו בבית החולים "נאצר" בח'אן יונס שבדרום רצועת עזה.
במסגרת תפקידו, מחמד אבו איסמעיל היה אחראי על ניהול פעילותם של מחבלי החטיבה והכוונתם לקידום ולהוצאה לפועל של מתווי טרור נגד כוחות צה"ל ואזרחי מדינת ישראל.
כמו כן, היה אחראי על החזקתם בשבי של חטופים רבים לאורך המלחמה.
…
יעד התקיפה בבית החולים נאצר - מח"ט ח'אן יונס בחמאס.
באם החיסול צלח, יהיה זה החיסול השלישי במספר של מפקד חטיבת ח'אן יונס מאז ה-7/10.
🔥19👍4
Showing the 12 most recent of 447 posts we hold for @TheMuhabrat. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@TheMuhabrat edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
1 October 2026
Most recent edit
1 October 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 10 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
אינטליניוז | חדשות המזרח התיכון | Intellinews @Intellinews · 30,288 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 6 September 2026
🔴 צבע אדום 🔴 @red_color · 38,139 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 31 August 2026
ארץ הג'יהאד @eretzh · 56,454 Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 23 August 2026
פיקוד העורף - צפון @PikudHaOref_3 · 25,911 Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 13 September 2026
דיווחים בזמן אמת @divuchimbizmanemet · 127,010 Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 13 August 2026
בן-ציון מקלס - גיאו-אנליסט @BenTzionM · 26,187 Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 13 September 2026
אח'בר אלעאלם אלערבי أخبار من العالم العربي @AlealamAlearabiuEranMalca · 20,535 Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 1 October 2026
מיכאל שמש @MichaelShemesh · 26,804 Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 14 September 2026
קבינט מדיני ביטחוני - מוריה אסרף & דורון קדוש @moriahdoron · 47,404 Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 26 August 2026
אבו צאלח הדסק הערבי @salehdesk1 · 187,656 Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 11 August 2026
🇮🇱ערוץ החדשות 8200🇮🇱 @New_security8200 · 79,168 Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 18 August 2026
12 פינת 99 - יניר קוזין וירון אברהם @yaronyanir1299 · 45,085 Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 27 August 2026
אפוק - מגזין | חדשות | פרשנויות - Epoch @MagEpoch · 90,873 Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 16 August 2026
Carmel News - חדשות @alexmehacarmel · 53,719 Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 24 August 2026
דפנה ליאל @lieldaphna · 57,358 Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 23 August 2026
חדשות NTD עברית @NTD_Hebrew · 98,383 Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 15 August 2026
עמאר אסדי - amar assadi news @amarassadi1 · 196,040 Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 12 August 2026
צה״ל - הערוץ הרשמי @idf_telegram · 95,254 Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 16 August 2026
עמיחי שטיין | הערוץ המדיני @US2020US · 22,324 Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 21 September 2026
חדשות 301 העולם הערבי @arabworld301news · 179,048 Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 12 August 2026
חדשות בזמן אמת @Realtimesecurity1 · 143,159 Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 13 August 2026
ביטחון שוטף @NeWSnOw247 · 43,535 Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 28 August 2026
כבאות והצלה ארצי @fireisrael7777 · 26,121 Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 13 September 2026
This channel appears in 58 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“המוח'אבראת - שאגת הארי.” (@TheMuhabrat), 27,401 subscribers as measured 11 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/TheMuhabrat.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.