9 measurements spanning 6 days, net -55. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 30,173–30,244 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
13 Aug 2026, 11:26
30,181
-6
12 Aug 2026, 11:37
30,187
-7
11 Aug 2026, 13:34
30,194
-9
10 Aug 2026, 10:23
30,203
-17
9 Aug 2026, 11:33
30,220
-6
8 Aug 2026, 13:56
30,226
-7
7 Aug 2026, 15:47
30,233
-3
7 Aug 2026, 08:45
30,236
no change
7 Aug 2026, 08:36
30,236
first reading
Engagement
238 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 18 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
1.46%
avg views ÷ 30,181 subscribers
Avg views / post
439
235 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.574%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
238
of 238 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 142 of 235 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 August 2026
Posts held
238 (7 August 2026 – 13 August 2026)
Views total
103,215
Reactions total
416
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
13 Aug 2026, 10:20 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
34m 58s
Average length
1m 24s
Measured directly from 25 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
416 reactions across 137 posts, in 19 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 20.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
83
20.0%
💔
83
20.0%
🤡
49
11.8%
🤮
33
7.93%
🤬
28
6.73%
👍
27
6.49%
🔥
21
5.05%
🙏
19
4.57%
👎
14
3.37%
😢
12
2.88%
🤩
9
2.16%
👀
8
1.92%
😁
8
1.92%
😱
7
1.68%
😡
5
1.20%
👏
4
0.962%
🤯
3
0.721%
😭
2
0.481%
🥰
1
0.24%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 142 of the 238 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 416reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 238 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 13 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
5
across the posts below
Posts paid on
5
of 235 we hold a reading for · 2%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @divuhimonline. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 238 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 7 August 2026 to 13 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
אלפי טונות של ציוד צבאי, דחפורי D9 ורכבים קרביים הגיעו לישראל במבצע רכש ושינוע מיוחד של משרד הביטחון וצה"ל
כחלק ממאמץ התמיכה המתמשך בהיערכות צה"ל לכלל התרחישים, משרד הביטחון השלים את קליטתה ופריקתה בישראל של אוניית מטען נוספת, שעליה אלפי טונות של ציוד צבאי ואמצעי לחימה.
המטען שנפרק בנמל חיפה כולל, בין היתר, דחפורי D9 חיוניים, רכבי האמר, רכבים ממוגנים מסוג JLTV, משאיות מסוג אושקוש וציוד רב נוסף המיועד לחיזוק הכשירות…
מנכ״ל בנק ירושלים יאיר קפלן לעובדים: ״בימים האחרונים אנו עדים לכתבות בתקשורת אודות היעלמותה של מלי יהלומי. אנו מבינים שאירוע כזה מעורר חששות וחוסר ודאות. יודגש, כי למעט העובדה שמדובר בעובדת הבנק, לא נמצא כל קשר בין האירוע לבנק. על האירוע מוטל צו איסור פרסום, ואסור להעביר כל מידע בנושא
ה-CIA הטיל ספק באמינות המודיעין הישראלי שלפיו איראן מתכננת להתנקש בנשיא ארה"ב דונלד טראמפ במהלך יציאתו מטורקיה - כך על פי דיווח ב"וושינגטון פוסט". לפי גורמי מודיעין אמריקניים בהווה ובעבר, המידע שהעבירה ישראל ל-CIA לא נתפס על ידי גורמים אמריקניים כמודיעין משכנע, והספקות הועברו גם לגורמים בממשל טראמפ. בסופו של דבר בשירות החשאי החליטו שלא לקחת סיכון - והוציאו את מבצע ההטעיה לפועל
פרשת היעלמות הישראליות בווינה: מניית בנק ירושלים צוללת בכ-5%; הבנק מבהיר: ״לא נמצא כל קשר בין האירוע לבנק״
ברקע היעלמותן של מלי וליאל יהלומי, מנכ״ל בנק ירושלים יאיר קפלן פנה לעובדי הבנק בעקבות הפרסומים: ״אנו מבינים שאירוע כזה מעורר חששות וחוסר ודאות. יודגש כי למעט העובדה שמדובר בעובדת הבנק, לא נמצא כל קשר בין האירוע לבנק״.
קפלן הוסיף כי על הפרשה מוטל צו איסור פרסום והבהיר לעובדים כי אסור להעביר מידע בנושא.
מבנק יר…
כלי תקשורת המזוהים עם הצי האמריקני חושפים כי לאחרונה התרחשו לפחות שלושה מקרים של חיילים שניסו לקפוץ אל מותם מסיפון נושאת המטוסים אברהם לינקולן המוצבת כבר חודשים ארוכים במפרץ עומאן, כחלק מהלחימה והמצור נגד איראן
השר איתמר בן גביר על אירועי קוסרה: "מדובר בחבר'ה שאני רואה הכי הרבה בצבא, משתטחים על רימון ועוזרים לעם ישראל. יש כאלה שבאמת צריך לעצור ולטפל בהם. לא כולם ל"ו צדיקים, אבל את רובם, שמיישבים את ארץ ישראל ושבונים מאחזים, אני מעריץ אותם"
❤1😁1
Signed מירי
Showing the 12 most recent of 238 posts we hold for @divuhimonline. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
רק נטו חדשות בטלגרם @raknetoooooo · 158,385 Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 12 August 2026
⚡️🔵חדשות הבזק ללא צנזורה🔵⚡️ @pkpoi · 158,871 Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 12 August 2026
🎗️חדשות ישראל IL🎗️ @newssil · 145,693 Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 13 August 2026
חדשות בזמן אמת @Realtimesecurity1 · 145,692 Telegram ranks this channel #79 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 13 August 2026
This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“דיווחים און ליין” (@divuhimonline), 30,181 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/divuhimonline.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
