תמונות מזירת החיסול בבית החולים. אני לא מזהה פה מכשירים רפואיים, אבל זה כנראה כי אני לא מספיק מבין ברפואה כמו הדוקטורים העזתים.
😁4🤩2
Signed צוף אפרתי

Channel
@NeWSnOw247
On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
43,556subscribers
-1,059 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001316655551 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @NeWSnOw247 |
| Description | ברוכים הבאים לערוץ ביטחון שוטף @NeWSnOw247 מתיחות ביטחונית בדרום או בצפון? חדשות חוץ, סוריה, דאעש, איראן... אצלינו תקבלו באופן שוטף ידיעות ביטחוניות מהארץ ומהעולם 24 שעות ביממה. ליצירת קשר דיווחים הע/ארות אנא כיתבו לנו @BitachonShotefChatBot |
| Created | 28 June 2019 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 65 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/NeWSnOw247 |
International news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 69% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 12 other registered channels. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
| Posted first | Then | Overlap | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| @idf_telegram/2491718 Aug 2026, 03:33 UTC | @NeWSnOw247/128301 · this entry18 Aug 2026, 04:18 UTC | 1.00 | 45 minutes |
| @idf_telegram/250352 Sept 2026, 18:38 UTC | @NeWSnOw247/128558 · this entry2 Sept 2026, 18:43 UTC | 1.00 | 5 minutes |
| @idf_telegram/250929 Sept 2026, 05:01 UTC | @NeWSnOw247/128690 · this entry9 Sept 2026, 05:23 UTC | 1.00 | 23 minutes |
| @idf_telegram/2511311 Sept 2026, 02:32 UTC | @NeWSnOw247/128751 · this entry11 Sept 2026, 03:14 UTC | 1.00 | 43 minutes |
| @idf_telegram/2515317 Sept 2026, 16:48 UTC | @NeWSnOw247/128870 · this entry17 Sept 2026, 16:51 UTC | 1.00 | 3 minutes |
| @idf_telegram/253027 Oct 2026, 04:13 UTC | @NeWSnOw247/129261 · this entry7 Oct 2026, 04:14 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| Channel | Matching posts | Text overlap | Typical gap | Published first |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| @idf_telegram | 20 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | 23 minutes | @idf_telegram (19–1) |
| @Mivzakeybitachon2225 | 19 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | 26 minutes | @Mivzakeybitachon2225 (16–3) |
| @New_security8200 | 18 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | 23 minutes | @New_security8200 (13–5) |
| @hotnews1 | 12 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | 30 minutes | @hotnews1 (11–1) |
| @divuhimonline | 8 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | 18 minutes | @divuhimonline (7–1) |
| @ziv710 | 5 (5/5 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | 41 minutes | this entry (3–2) |
| @NewsArmy | 5 (5/5 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | 38 minutes | @NewsArmy (3–2) |
| @yedidya_epshteyn | 5 (5/5 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 0.98 | 22 minutes | @yedidya_epshteyn (3–2) |
| @amitsegal | 6 (6/6 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | 53 minutes | @amitsegal (6–0) |
| @TheBigBadShadow | 5 (5/5 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 0.96 | 13 minutes | @TheBigBadShadow (3–2) |
| @arabworld301news | 7 (7/7 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 0.99 | 36 minutes | @arabworld301news (5–2) |
| @abualiexpress | 11 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 0.99 | 46 minutes | @abualiexpress (11–0) |
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 85 of the 85 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 1,056 comparable posts for this entry, running 5 August 2026 to 11 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Recorded under the keys clone_copy · clone_mutual, last confirmed 12 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Nov 2026, 22:51 | 43,556 | -25 |
| 10 Nov 2026, 03:48 | 43,581 | -10 |
| 8 Nov 2026, 14:34 | 43,591 | -26 |
| 7 Nov 2026, 11:55 | 43,617 | -4 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 12:19 | 43,621 | -5 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 11:35 | 43,626 | -13 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 11:37 | 43,639 | -6 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 12:37 | 43,645 | -9 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 09:56 | 43,654 | -9 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 09:00 | 43,663 | -12 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 10:36 | 43,675 | -5 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 12:58 | 43,680 | -9 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 10:49 | 43,689 | -9 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 11:06 | 43,698 | -12 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 13:20 | 43,710 | -8 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 12:54 | 43,718 | -9 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 11:38 | 43,727 | -6 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 08:40 | 43,733 | -7 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 10:20 | 43,740 | -10 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 12:40 | 43,750 | first reading |
1,664 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 190 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 590 of 598 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 1,664 (5 August 2026 – 12 November 2026) |
| Views total | 953,840 |
| Reactions total | 7,446 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Nov 2026, 08:17 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 173 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
11,774 reactions across 989 posts, in 36 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 17.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 💯 | 2,059 | 17.5% | |
| 🏆 | 1,135 | 9.64% | |
| ❤ | 1,102 | 9.36% | |
| 👍 | 1,057 | 8.98% | |
| 🤣 | 911 | 7.74% | |
| 🔥 | 810 | 6.88% | |
| 🤬 | 555 | 4.71% | |
| 🤡 | 427 | 3.63% | |
| 🤮 | 417 | 3.54% | |
| 😁 | 400 | 3.40% | |
| 👏 | 354 | 3.01% | |
| 💔 | 326 | 2.77% | |
| 💩 | 281 | 2.39% | |
| ❤🔥 | 234 | 1.99% | |
| 🙏 | 211 | 1.79% | |
| ⚡ | 209 | 1.78% | |
| 👌 | 182 | 1.55% | |
| 👀 | 147 | 1.25% | |
| 🤩 | 140 | 1.19% | |
| 😍 | 100 | 0.849% | |
| 16 further kinds | 717 | 6.09% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 991 of the 1,000 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 11,774 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 21 September 2026 to 12 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 457 of 598 posts held from the last 30 days (76.4%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
תמונות מזירת החיסול בבית החולים. אני לא מזהה פה מכשירים רפואיים, אבל זה כנראה כי אני לא מספיק מבין ברפואה כמו הדוקטורים העזתים.
😁4🤩2
Signed צוף אפרתי
מצורפת שיחה של קצין במת"ק עזה לגורם בכיר במערכת הבריאות ברצועת עזה:
👍3
Signed Beatman
מצורפות אילוסטרציה וגרפיקה של בית החולים בו הסתתרו המחבלים:
👍4
Signed Beatman
הודעה משותפת לדובר צה"ל ודוברות שב"כ: צה"ל ושב"כ תקפו במהלך הלילה (ה'), מחבל בכיר ומחבלים נוספים מארגון הטרור חמאס בעת שהסתתרו בבית החולים 'נאצר' בחאן יונס שבדרום רצועת עזה. המחבלים הותקפו מהאוויר להסרת האיום מאחר וקידמו מתווי טרור נגד אזרחי מדינת ישראל וכוחות צה"ל, זאת לאחר שחמאס התבסס בשטחי בית החולים והפך אותו למפקדה לפעילות צבאית וטרור נגד כוחות צה"ל ומדינת ישראל. פעילות זו, המהווה הפרה בוטה של הדין הבין-לאומי …
❤4
Signed Beatman
סיכום אירועי הלילה ופעילות כוחות הביטחון ע"פ דיווחים ערביים: 🔹יהודה ושומרון: ▪️צפון השומרון: עקבה, סיריס. ▪️שומרון: ענאבתא, דיר שרף, שכם, קלקיליה. ▪️בנימין: חיזמה. ▪️בקעת הירדן: מחנה עין א-סולטן. ▪️עציון: מחנה דהיישה, בית פאג'ר. 🔹רצועת עזה: ▪️דרום הרצועה: תקיפה בבית החולים 'נאצר', חאן יונס – 6 מחוסלים ומעל 20 פצועים.
👍2
Signed Beatman
תקיפה בבית החולים 'נאצר' בעיר חאן יונס, דרום רצועת עזה - 6 מחוסלים ומעל 20 פצועים.
👏5🔥3
Signed Beatman
נשיא ארה״ב דונלד טראמפ: ״ניצחנו באיראן״.
🤣47🤡26💊5🤯5🥱4
Signed Xanny
בשורה משמחת. אבל מעצר ושחרור זה לא מספיק. כדי למנוע הישנות אירועי התעללות כאלו בחתונות, האולם צריך לההרס. ואומר עוד משהו: כאשר אדם רואה התעללות כזו בכל אירוע / חתונה, זה מתנרמל אצלו במח. ומכאן קצרה הדרך להתעללות בבני אדם.
💯10
Signed צוף אפרתי
כוחות מיחידת 'חץ יהודה' של מחוז ש"י עצרו ארבעה פלסטינים תושבי חברון, החשודים בהתעללות בבעל חיים, לאחר שתיעוד מתוך חתונה בחברון (מצורף) התפרסם ברשתות החברתיות. כדי להגיב לכתבה לחצו כאן
👍6🤮5
Signed צוף אפרתי
עיריית אל-קוביבה ליד הר אדר קיבלה 300 עצים מהארגונים OXFAM (ארגון בינלאומי אנטישמי) ו-ESDC (ארגון פלסטיני), "כחלק מהמאמצים לשיפור השטחים הירוקים ולשיפור המראה האסתטי והסביבתי". הערה: בד"כ שתילת עצים כאלו משמשים להשתלטות על שטח. כדאי לטפל בבעיה לפני שהיא תכה שורשים בקרקע.
🤬11💯1
Signed צוף אפרתי
גם בבריטניה ובאירלנד מאות בתי ספר פונו עקב דיווחי שווא על פצצות. בנתיים זה זאב זאב, עד שיום אחד באמת תהיה פצצה.
🔥10💯3
Signed צוף אפרתי
אחרי טיסות,נמלי תעופה וערוצי טלוויזיה הגיע תורם של בתי הספר: מעל ל-300 בתי ספר באיטליה פונו בעקבות התרעות שקיבלו על מטעני חבלה. כר פורה לשריפתם כמו בצרפת.
🔥8🤬1
Signed צוף אפרתי
Showing the 12 most recent of 1,664 posts we hold for @NeWSnOw247. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@NeWSnOw247 edited 8 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
The 6 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
בכמה מ-20 הערים הגדולות לא הושגה הכרעה של 61 לאחד הגושים?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
מתבייש לשאול אתכם העוקבים, אבל האם יש כאן מישהו שלא הצביע?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
כמה פעמים מקרון יזכיר את המילה 'פלסטין', בנאום?
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
מי הכי מתאים להוביל את ביטחון ישראל כרגע?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
איך צריכות להתקבל החלטות בקבינט?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
על ישראל להכריז על מלחמה רשמית או רק אם היו חלילה עשרות הרוגים? רוצים לשמוע את דעתכם!!!
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 21 September 2026 to 12 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 28 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 79 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ביטחון שוטף” (@NeWSnOw247), 43,556 subscribers as measured 11 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/NeWSnOw247.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.