Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ד"ר אמיר בוחבוט

Channel

ד"ר אמיר בוחבוט

@amirbohbot

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

18,557subscribers

-207 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001496124095
TypeChannel
Username@amirbohbot
Descriptionצבא, ביטחון, טרור, מודיעין ותקשורת
Created2 May 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 November 2026
Measurements held59
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/amirbohbot

Topic

National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 61% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 3 other registered channels. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@amirbohbot/30907 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 15:16 UTC@hotnews1/4697797 Aug 2026, 15:32 UTC1.0016 minutes
@hotnews1/47027313 Aug 2026, 19:27 UTC@amirbohbot/30963 · this entry13 Aug 2026, 19:27 UTC1.00under a minute
@hotnews1/47062818 Aug 2026, 17:03 UTC@amirbohbot/31003 · this entry18 Aug 2026, 17:13 UTC1.0010 minutes
@hotnews1/47120225 Aug 2026, 10:16 UTC@amirbohbot/31060 · this entry25 Aug 2026, 10:18 UTC1.002 minutes
@amirbohbot/31086 · this entry27 Aug 2026, 13:00 UTC@hotnews1/47141127 Aug 2026, 13:11 UTC1.0010 minutes
@amirbohbot/31094 · this entry27 Aug 2026, 19:02 UTC@hotnews1/47145127 Aug 2026, 19:02 UTC1.00under a minute
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@hotnews113 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)0.992 minutesthis entry (7–6)
@Mivzakeybitachon22258 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)0.992 minutesthis entry (6–2)
@hatzhalhyosh5 (5/5 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.005 minutesthis entry (4–1)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 9 of the 9 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 162 comparable posts for this entry, running 5 August 2026 to 10 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Recorded under the keys clone_mutual · clone_source, last confirmed 11 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

18,55218,76418,6586 August 2026 — 18,764 subscribers7 August 2026 — 18,761 subscribers8 August 2026 — 18,751 subscribers9 August 2026 — 18,749 subscribers10 August 2026 — 18,740 subscribers11 August 2026 — 18,739 subscribers12 August 2026 — 18,732 subscribers13 August 2026 — 18,729 subscribers14 August 2026 — 18,730 subscribers16 August 2026 — 18,719 subscribers17 August 2026 — 18,711 subscribers18 August 2026 — 18,716 subscribers19 August 2026 — 18,715 subscribers21 August 2026 — 18,709 subscribers23 August 2026 — 18,706 subscribers24 August 2026 — 18,695 subscribers25 August 2026 — 18,694 subscribers26 August 2026 — 18,698 subscribers27 August 2026 — 18,692 subscribers28 August 2026 — 18,695 subscribers30 August 2026 — 18,687 subscribers31 August 2026 — 18,685 subscribers1 September 2026 — 18,684 subscribers2 September 2026 — 18,686 subscribers3 September 2026 — 18,685 subscribers5 September 2026 — 18,688 subscribers8 September 2026 — 18,675 subscribers11 September 2026 — 18,658 subscribers13 September 2026 — 18,653 subscribers15 September 2026 — 18,646 subscribers16 September 2026 — 18,644 subscribers19 September 2026 — 18,641 subscribers25 September 2026 — 18,645 subscribers4 October 2026 — 18,622 subscribers13 October 2026 — 18,619 subscribers14 October 2026 — 18,616 subscribers15 October 2026 — 18,612 subscribers17 October 2026 — 18,608 subscribers18 October 2026 — 18,597 subscribers19 October 2026 — 18,595 subscribers20 October 2026 — 18,593 subscribers21 October 2026 — 18,586 subscribers22 October 2026 — 18,573 subscribers23 October 2026 — 18,575 subscribers24 October 2026 — 18,570 subscribers25 October 2026 — 18,571 subscribers26 October 2026 — 18,573 subscribers27 October 2026 — 18,571 subscribers28 October 2026 — 18,567 subscribers29 October 2026 — 18,569 subscribers31 October 2026 — 18,568 subscribers1 November 2026 — 18,563 subscribers2 November 2026 — 18,565 subscribers3 November 2026 — 18,564 subscribers5 November 2026 — 18,556 subscribers6 November 2026 — 18,554 subscribers7 November 2026 — 18,555 subscribers8 November 2026 — 18,552 subscribers10 November 2026 — 18,557 subscribers18,5576 August 202610 November 2026
59 measurements spanning 96 days, net -207. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 18,520–18,796 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 59
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Nov 2026, 07:4518,557+5
8 Nov 2026, 22:1118,552-3
7 Nov 2026, 12:3118,555+1
6 Nov 2026, 11:2918,554-2
5 Nov 2026, 12:2018,556-8
3 Nov 2026, 07:5618,564-1
2 Nov 2026, 04:3118,565+2
1 Nov 2026, 06:0618,563-5
31 Oct 2026, 02:3818,568-1
29 Oct 2026, 23:3618,569+2
28 Oct 2026, 20:0918,567-4
27 Oct 2026, 16:4918,571-2
26 Oct 2026, 19:3018,573+2
25 Oct 2026, 20:5018,571+1
24 Oct 2026, 19:1718,570-5
23 Oct 2026, 21:5018,575+2
22 Oct 2026, 18:3918,573-13
21 Oct 2026, 15:5818,586-7
20 Oct 2026, 14:4518,593-2
19 Oct 2026, 14:2718,595first reading

Engagement

332 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 72 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
14.6%
avg views ÷ 18,557 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,710
69 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.586%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
69
of 332 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 63 of 69 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 November 2026
Posts held332 (5 August 2026 – 10 November 2026)
Views total186,880
Reactions total1,002
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken11 Nov 2026, 04:11 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈2,820
Videos
≈1,220
Links
≈4,500

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
12m 16s
Average length
57s

Measured directly from 13 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

5,094 reactions across 305 posts, in 27 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍2,01839.6%
🔥66413.0%
🤬53810.6%
👎4148.13%
👏3166.20%
🤔2074.06%
🥰1442.83%
😡1162.28%
😢1122.20%
😱1052.06%
🤷‍♂861.69%
🏆821.61%
💯791.55%
✍400.785%
🤷370.726%
🙈310.609%
🤷‍♀270.53%
😈210.412%
😇140.275%
😘100.196%
7 further kinds330.648%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 305 of the 332 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5,094 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 332 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 10 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 1 of 69 posts held from the last 30 days (1.45%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

10 Nov 2026, 11:21 UTC≈1,180 views3 reactionsread 11 November 2026

https://www.walla.co.il/news/military/383960767

👍3

10 Nov 2026, 06:43 UTC≈1,570 views13 reactionsread 11 November 2026

מעריך את הגישה במל״ל, משרד הביטחון ובצה״ל על רקע הצהרת טראמפ על הפסקת הסיוע הביטחוני. צריך לחפש את ההזדמנויות שנוצרו ולא רק להתבונן על חצי הכוס הריקה. יש הרבה הזדמנויות בסיטואציה שנוצרה. אני גם מצפה מרח״ט תכנון תא״ל מורן עומר לצאת מאזור הנוחות ולהיות הרבה יותר יצירתי בכל מה שקשור לבניין כוח.

🤔10👍3

10 Nov 2026, 06:39 UTC≈1,530 views31 reactionsread 11 November 2026

נער בן 14 שנערך לידוי אבנים מהכפר בורקה שבנפת שכם נהרג מאש צה״ל

👏16🔥11🏆4

10 Nov 2026, 06:38 UTC≈1,510 views7 reactionsread 11 November 2026

בזמן שארה״ב מתארת את המו״מ עם איראן כחיובי הצבא האמריקאי נערך להסלמה ומשמרות המהפכה האיראנים ועוד איך משתקמים ומייצרים מערכות נשק לקראת התנגשות צבאית אם תתמש. בשלב זה אני לא רואה מוצא אחר....האיראנים בנתיים מנצלים היטב את הזמן (חרף טבעת הסנקציות המתהדקת)

😱7

10 Nov 2026, 05:17 UTC≈1,740 views21 reactionsread 11 November 2026

צה״ל תוקף הבוקר בדרום לבנון. חיזבאללה מנסה לעצב את דרום לבנון מחדש. לא רק סמוך לקו צהוב. צבא לבנון לא באמת מממש את המדיניות של ממשלת לבנון בהתאם למזכר ההבנות בין ירושלים לביירות

🔥21

9 Nov 2026, 19:42 UTC≈1,970 views9 reactionsread 11 November 2026

https://www.walla.co.il/news/military/383960710

👏9

9 Nov 2026, 18:04 UTC≈2,240 views18 reactionsread 11 November 2026

ראית כעת ערוץ 12 את הח״כ לעתיד יורם כהן (ראש השב״כ לשעבר). הוא דיבר על תגמול משמעותי בעתיד למשרתי הקבע , למשרתי הסדיר, למילואימניקים, ואני מזכיר לו לא לשכוח את נשות ואנשי השב״כ שעובדים יום ולילה 24/7 ותנאיהם נשחקו עם השנים והאתגרים ? רק גדלו וגדלו והפכו להיות הרבה יותר מורכבים. לא לשכוח!

💯11🙈7

9 Nov 2026, 13:28 UTC≈2,370 views17 reactionsread 11 November 2026

מבצע מעצרים בחטיבת מנשה: השלמת מבצע המעצרים הבוקר מצטרף למאמץ המתמשך לסיכול חוליות טרור במרחב צפון השומרון. ⁠בחודשיים האחרונים, תחת פיקוד חטיבת מנשה ובהכוונה של השב״כ, הושלמו שלושה מבצעים לסיכול חוליות שתכננו להוציא לפועל פיגועים: ⁠מעצרם של 10 מחבלים המשתייכים לחוליית טרור. ⁠ סיכול חוליית מחבלים מקאבטיה ומעצר 5 מחבלים. ⁠סיכול תשתית טרור של חמאס בכפר עקאבה, במהלכו נעצרו 10 מחבלים והוחרמו רקטה (ללא משגר) ונשק מסוג M-16…

👏17

9 Nov 2026, 13:18 UTC≈2,110 views36 reactionsread 11 November 2026

האיראנים מורחים את הזמן. אחר כך טראמפ מתפלא למה הפסיד בבחירות האמצע

✍22💯10👏4

9 Nov 2026, 11:02 UTC≈2,280 views8 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Video

כוח רב לאומי בעזה?

🤬6👍2

9 Nov 2026, 05:02 UTC≈2,400 views19 reactionsread 11 November 2026

https://www.walla.co.il/news/military/383960472

😡19

8 Nov 2026, 15:13 UTC≈2,340 views10 reactionsread 11 November 2026

דובר צה״ל: מפקדת אוגדה 98 השלימה את משימתה ביהודה ושומרון: יותר מ-1,500 פעילויות שונות (??) ומעצר של יותר מ-140 חשודים (כמה מהם שוחררו?)

👍10

Showing the 12 most recent of 332 posts we hold for @amirbohbot. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

14 Aug 2026, 20:04 UTCAnonymous Poll959 voters

לתקוף באיראן ללא הסכמת ארה״ב?

  1. כן74%
  2. לא20%
  3. אין לי דעה7%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

7 Aug 2026, 18:20 UTCAnonymous Poll582 voters

האם ההדחות של בכירי הארגון החשאי על ידי ראש המוסד הטרי רומן גופמן הן לגיטימיות?

  1. כן76%
  2. לא14%
  3. אין לי דעה10%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 332 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 10 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

הלל ביטון רוזן
@HallelBittonRosen · 35,231
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 2 September 2026
אלמוג בוקר עדכונים
@almogboker78 · 60,244
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 22 August 2026
אח'בר אלעאלם אלערבי أخبار من العالم العربي
@AlealamAlearabiuEranMalca · 20,544
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 1 October 2026
קבינט מדיני ביטחוני - מוריה אסרף & דורון קדוש
@moriahdoron · 47,372
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 26 August 2026
יוסף חדאד - Yoseph Haddad
@yosephhaddad · 49,522
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 25 August 2026
מיכאל שמש
@MichaelShemesh · 26,757
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 14 September 2026
המוח'אבראת - שאגת הארי.
@TheMuhabrat · 27,416
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 10 September 2026
מוטי קסטל - Moti Kastel
@kastelmoti14 · 28,814
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 10 September 2026
אינטליניוז | חדשות המזרח התיכון | Intellinews
@Intellinews · 30,331
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 6 September 2026
עמיחי שטיין | הערוץ המדיני
@US2020US · 22,325
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 21 September 2026
12 פינת 99 - יניר קוזין וירון אברהם
@yaronyanir1299 · 45,114
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 27 August 2026
צה״ל - הערוץ הרשמי
@idf_telegram · 95,303
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 16 August 2026
יאיר אלטמן - הערוץ הרשמי 🇮🇱
@Yair_Altman_channel14 · 31,436
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 5 September 2026
קפטן איוב الكابتن أيوب Captain job
@captainjob · 49,322
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 29 August 2026
זיו רובינשטיין - עד שהמלחמה תסתיים
@ziv710 · 41,631
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 29 August 2026
דפנה ליאל
@lieldaphna · 57,340
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 23 August 2026
שטח אש 🔥 בטלגרם
@Hidcunim_news · 24,292
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 15 September 2026
אבישי גרינצייג - עדכונים
@grinzaig · 27,518
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 12 September 2026
ביטחון שוטף
@NeWSnOw247 · 43,581
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 28 August 2026
נועם אמיר
@noamamir · 20,578
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 26 September 2026
בן-ציון מקלס - גיאו-אנליסט
@BenTzionM · 26,189
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 13 September 2026
Carmel News - חדשות
@alexmehacarmel · 53,745
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 24 August 2026
ארץ הג'יהאד
@eretzh · 56,513
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 23 August 2026
אבו צאלח הדסק הערבי
@salehdesk1 · 187,798
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 11 August 2026

This channel appears in 130 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ד"ר אמיר בוחבוט” (@amirbohbot), 18,557 subscribers as measured 10 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/amirbohbot.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.