FAQs Part 3: Can Fauci be prosecuted for funding GOF; is self-amplifying RNA a danger to unvaccinated, and more of your questions answered. https://sashalatypova.substack.com/p/faqs-part-3-can-fauci-be-prosecuted

Channel
TheHighWire with Del Bigtree
@TheHighWire
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
8,535subscribers
-163 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001213619123 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @TheHighWire |
| Created | 30 July 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 26 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 16 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 26 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/TheHighWire |
Topic
Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 93% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 26 Sept 2026, 15:41 | 8,535 | -31 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 20:16 | 8,566 | -7 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 10:58 | 8,573 | -12 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 20:55 | 8,585 | -17 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 05:36 | 8,602 | -23 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 05:14 | 8,625 | -11 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 12:14 | 8,636 | -6 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 02:04 | 8,642 | -9 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 10:46 | 8,651 | -14 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 15:28 | 8,665 | -7 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 19:29 | 8,672 | -12 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 22:15 | 8,684 | -3 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 14:11 | 8,687 | -10 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 14:04 | 8,697 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 10:18 | 8,698 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 09:50 | 8,698 | first reading |
Engagement
103 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 28 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 1.04%
- avg views ÷ 8,535 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 89.0
- 1 post measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 1
- of 103 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 103 (31 July 2026 – 28 August 2026) |
| Views total | 89 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 28 Aug 2026, 16:46 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 1m 17s
- Average length
- 26s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
93 reactions across 40 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 36 | 38.7% | |
| 👎 | 19 | 20.4% | |
| 👍 | 14 | 15.1% | |
| 😱 | 11 | 11.8% | |
| 😢 | 7 | 7.53% | |
| 🎉 | 4 | 4.30% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 1.08% | |
| 🤩 | 1 | 1.08% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 43 of the 103 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 93 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 103 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Episode 491: MEASLES BLAME GAME, FAUCI LAWYERS UP & THE CLANCY PHARMA CONNECTION https://thehighwire.com/ark-videos/measles-blame-game-fauci-lawyers-up-the-clancy-pharma-connection/
❤1
Climate Change Deception: The Alarming Corruption of Science - Dr. Justin Mabie https://drtenpenny.substack.com/p/climate-change-deception-the-alarming
Tenpenny Throwback Thursday https://drtenpenny.substack.com/p/tenpenny-throwback-thursday-895
Yes, There Is DNA from Aborted Fetal Tissue in the Measles Vaccine https://aaronsiri.substack.com/p/yes-there-is-dna-from-aborted-fetal
DEI Exposed: How the Biggest Con of the Century Almost Toppled Higher Education - Stanley K. Ridgley https://drtenpenny.substack.com/p/dei-exposed-how-the-biggest-con-of
Dr. Stanley Plotkin, the World’s Leading Vaccinologist, Under Oath https://aaronsiri.substack.com/p/dr-stanley-plotkin-the-worlds-leading
It always comes back to Epstein! Jared Kushner just met privately with Democratic House leader Hakeem Jeffries as the midterms approach. But there’s another name sitting right in the middle of these worlds that caught my attention: Marc Rowan. Rowan is the CEO of Apollo Global Management. In 2022, he maxed out to Hakeem Jeffries with $5,800. But that was the small check. That same cycle, Rowan sent $1 million to…
What We Know About the Two “Measles Deaths” in Lancaster County, Pennsylvania https://aaronsiri.substack.com/p/what-we-know-about-the-two-measles
Morning Coffee - August 26, 2026 Edition https://drtenpenny.substack.com/p/morning-coffee-august-26-2026-edition
THIS THURSDAY ON THE HIGHWIRE! https://thehighwire.com/ark-videos/this-thursday-on-the-highwire-24/
“One of the funds that Epstein was involved in setting up was actually handling money for our current Treasury Secretary, Scott Bessent.” –Whitney Webb .... Scott Bessent was code-named "Sterling" in leaked emails between Jeffrey Epstein's business partner and George Soros's hedge fund. Nobody is talking about this while he tanks our economy, so I will. ----- In August 2024, a hacker group called Handala breached t…
👍2❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 103 posts we hold for @TheHighWire. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
@bucovinaprofunda · 4,4994 postsVoci independente
@VociIndependente · 1,3612 postsSelaReport | דו״ח סלע
@SelaReport · 471 postUndocumentedHuman
@UndocumentedHuman · 161 postDr. Edward Group, DC
@drgroupofficial · 19,6621 postFreedom of the heart
@freedomandresistance · 3291 postSouth African Vaccination Education (SAVE)
@vaccinationeducation · 1221 postPURE BLOOD, DON'T TAKE THE POISON JAB! EXPOSE THE NWO!
@wordtwakker · 31 post
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
@iceagefarmer · 67,5985 postsDr Jane Ruby
@DrJaneRuby · 58,4222 postsEpsteinUnsealed
@EpsteinUnsealed · 3,8582 postsJewish Truth Archive
@JewTruthArchive · 4,4451 postMagic Eight Ball Redux 🎱
@Magic8BallRedux · 1,9831 postTartaria & History Channel
@TartariaHistoryChannel · 119,9861 postGeopolitics Prime | Iran & Ukraine News Updates
@geopolitics_prime · 292,2361 postThe Crowhouse
@thecrowhouseoffical · 29,5661 post
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@EpsteinUnsealed · 3,8582 postsIce Age Farmer
@iceagefarmer · 67,5982 postsEARTHSEEDERS
@earthseeders · 16,3821 postGeopolitics Prime | Iran & Ukraine News Updates
@geopolitics_prime · 292,2361 postJewish Truth Archive
@JewTruthArchive · 4,4451 postThomas Massie
@RepThomasMassie · 2,8061 postTartaria & History Channel
@TartariaHistoryChannel · 119,9861 postTartaria English Group
@TartarianEnglishGroup · 21,8111 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@DoctorMercola · 31,490
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 5 September 2026
@sayeregengmi · 27,942
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 10 September 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“TheHighWire with Del Bigtree” (@TheHighWire), 8,535 subscribers as measured 26 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/TheHighWire.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.