Channel
@EpsteinUnsealed
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
3,832subscribers
-3 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002398995155 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @EpsteinUnsealed |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 10 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/EpsteinUnsealed |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 00:52 | 3,832 | -3 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 02:38 | 3,835 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 10:48 | 3,835 | first reading |
15 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 4 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 15 (2 August 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 10,991 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 06:02 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
💡💡💡 A newly released Senate report reveals that more than $1 billion in suspicious transactions linked to Jeffrey Epstein were processed by JPMorgan Chase, Deutsche Bank, and Bank of America. Deutsche Bank, JPMorgan and Bank of America allegedly helped enable convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein by delaying the screening and reporting of his financial transactions, according to a Senate Finance Committee report p…
Hey @grok Did Nick Fuentes ever say that Epstein was not a pedophile because the victims were around 13-14 years old? Start with 👍 or 🙅 @grok 👍 On his America First stream, Nick Fuentes stated “Jeff Epstein, not a pedophile” and “All of his victims, 14 to 17, that’s not pedophilia,” arguing the ages were past biological sexual maturity rather than prepubescent children. https://x.com/Parodyjeffx/status/2085710…
🔯 Juval Aviv is a former Mossad agent and assassin. Juval was the leader of a team that hunted down the Black September terrorists who murdered 11 Israeli athletes at the 1972 Munich Olympics. His story became the basis for the book 'Vengeance' and the Steven Spielberg film 'Munich'. Juval was also hired by Ghislaine Maxwell to investigate the death of her father Robert Maxwell. ["Max" Book Link] Juval and Danny …
Trump ruined his presidency with 3 main things. Epstein fumble/cover up The israel First Agenda The Iran War I think you’ve listed three things that are basically the same thing
Here. Let me explain Trump's presidency to you in 45 seconds. https://x.com/WearForbidden/status/2084677461007110308 🗂 @EpsteinUnsealed
JEFFREY EPSTEIN WAS FUNDING AI DECADES AGO — AND PEOPLE ARE FINALLY CONNECTING THE DOTS Jeffrey Epstein wasn’t just a blackmailer. Long before ChatGPT or any of today’s AI companies became famous, he was quietly funding the pioneers of artificial intelligence. In 2002, he gave hundreds of thousands of dollars to Marvin Minsky, one of the founding fathers of AI, during a ceremony on St. Thomas. He also funded Joi …
Any member of the Trump admin that wants to run for POTUS in 28 who has defended Trump’s war in Iran and not spoken out against it publicly, has stood with the admin on the coverup of the Epstein files, and refuses to publicly apologize to the American people for the creating more inflation and high gas prices with the Iran war, will not be trusted. 64% of Americans are against the Iran war, and it is a complete bet…
Thomas Massie @RepThomasMassie Trump expands his base by welcoming Epstein’s lawyer Alan Dershowitz into MAGA. This should work out great for the midterms. 👇 ALAN DERSHOWITZ (@AlanDersh): ✔️ Epstein’s lawyer. ✔️ Jewish-American Zionist. ✔️ Epstein Island visitor. ✔️ Accused of rape by Epstein survivors. ✔️ Publicly argued that adults should be allowed to have sex with 14-year-old children. 👔 TRUMP: “Alan is…
https://mol.im/a/16030073
President Trump -- after purging Rep. Thomas Massie, Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, Tucker Carlson, Candace Owens, and Alex Jones from the GOP and "MAGA" -- on Tuesday welcomed in "the highly respected" Alan Dershowitz to the GOP. "The Highly Respected Alan Dershowitz has written a powerful new book, 'Why I quit the Dems and so should you! (confessions of a reluctant Republican*),'" Trump wrote on his cash grab site T…
MTG: "Trump told me that I deserve having my son kIlled." He told me directly, "It's your fault. You deserve it," for standing up Epstein's victims. https://x.com/ImBreckWorsham/status/2084815580960264373 🗂 @EpsteinUnsealed
💥💥💥 ‼️‼️‼️ BARI WEISS NOW AN INTRICATE PART OF THE EPSTEIN COVER UP: CBS apparently had a major Epstein story in the works detailing major corruption at the top of Wall Street banks and involving the Virgin Islands government Never made it to air under the new Bari Weiss/Ellison leadership. 👇 Deutsche Bank failed to promptly report to US authorities more than $250M in suspicious transactions tied to Jeffrey Epst…
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @EpsteinUnsealed. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 197,160 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 8 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@EpsteinUnsealed named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“EpsteinUnsealed” (@EpsteinUnsealed), 3,832 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/EpsteinUnsealed.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.