Video, posted without a caption

Channel
Impfkritik
@impfung
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
1,999subscribers
-3 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001182963500 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @impfung |
| Created | 30 April 2019 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 10 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/impfung |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 13:34 | 1,999 | -2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:27 | 2,001 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 20:01 | 2,002 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 19:54 | 2,002 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 2 March 2020 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 February 2022. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 1m 25s
- Average length
- 1m 25s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
🍃 Was tun bei Nebenwirkungen der so genannten @Impfung? Dr. Alina Lessenich erklärt uns seit Anfang Juni in regelmäßigen Sprach- Mitteilungen, wie wir unsere Immunabwehr auf natürlichem Wege stärken können. t.me/DrAlinaLessenich
Der 🇺🇸Impfkritiker Del Bigtree publiziert wöchentlich eine Info-Sendung für unsere gesundheitliche Selbstbestimmung.
💉📊🇨🇭 Statistik der Impfschäden, die durch pharmazeutische Menschenversuche in der Schweiz entstanden sind. t.me/DatenAnalyseProgrammieren
😷Impf-Schäden aus aller Welt. Dieses englische Projekt begann auf Twitter, wo es jedoch zensiert wurde. Wahrheit kann weh tun. t.me/covidvaccineinjuries
💉🦠 Impfschäden: eine große Sammlung von Berichten
💉 Der corona-blog.net liefert kritische Infos durch eigene Recherchen. In letzter Zeit wird die @Impfung mit einigen Argumenten auseinander genommen. Und auf dem offiziellen Telegram-Kanal erscheinen neben den Blog-Posts noch zusätzliche Hinweise.
👨⚕Dieser Top-Facharzt arbeitet seit über 12 Monaten unermüdlich für die Aufklärung. Und er warnt eindringlich vor der unnötigen und unausgereiften "Corona-Impfung".
📹 Unbedingt anhören: informative Argumente von 🎤@KilezMore! Und hier ist die lange Liste renommierter Kritiker der #Corona-Politik: nitter.cc/KilezMore/status/1362434488169619459
t.me/impftote (Gruppe)
Studien, medizinische Fachartikel, Dokumentationen, etc. bestätigen, dass Impfkritik mehr als gerechtfertigt ist: @DKDE_Impf_FAKTEN! Hier findet ihr zu jeder Impf-Thematik den passenden Beitrag von DKDE
Trage deine Botschaft in die Welt hinaus! Hier gibt's bedruckte Textilien mit dem Spruch: „Niemand hat die Absicht, eine Impfpflicht einzuführen!“ t.me/HarlekinShop
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @impfung. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,088,420 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@corona_blog · 9361 postCorona_Fakten
@Corona_Fakten · 48,9971 postCorona ist nicht das Problem
@Corona_ist_nicht_das_Problem · 19,8341 postCovid Vaccine Injuries
@covidvaccineinjuries · 37,3131 postEMA Daten Analyse Programmieren
@DatenAnalyseProgrammieren · 16,9341 postDr. Alina Lessenich
@dralinalessenich · 51,9691 postET VIDEO & CONTENT
@etvideocontent · 7,1771 postimpfen-nein-danke.de offiziell | Vorsprung durch Wissen
@impfen_nein_danke · 12,3101 postImpfkritk.de - Portal für unabhängige Impfaufklärung und Impfreport - Die Würde des Menschen ist unantastbar!
@Impfkritik_de · 5181 postImpfstoff-Kritik
@ImpfstoffKritik · 6,0241 post⁉️💉Individuelle_Impfentscheidung_💉⁉️
@Individuelle_Impfentscheidung · 9061 postKilez More [sic!]
@KilezMore · 11,2471 postLOVEstorm people TV Germany
@LOVEstormPeopleTV · 3441 postTheHighWire with Del Bigtree
@TheHighWire · 8,6841 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 3
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 3
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@impfung named 3 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Impfkritik” (@impfung), 1,999 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/impfung.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.