JOIN to improve your 𝐌𝐚𝐬𝐜𝐮𝐥𝐢𝐧𝐢𝐭𝐲 & 𝐃𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐆𝐚𝐦𝐞
By https://x.com/SeduceCleopatra/
Click here 👉 http://linktr.ee/Eden_Apple
🎁 Free gifts or promotions
💋Dating Knowledge: t.me/TheEdenApple
Created
Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 42% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
35 measurements spanning 62 days, net -611. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 21,088–21,883 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 35
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
8 Oct 2026, 13:57
21,180
-49
4 Oct 2026, 04:42
21,229
-67
25 Sept 2026, 10:17
21,296
-69
17 Sept 2026, 05:36
21,365
-9
15 Sept 2026, 08:57
21,374
-15
13 Sept 2026, 17:18
21,389
-24
11 Sept 2026, 20:38
21,413
-34
9 Sept 2026, 11:37
21,447
-48
6 Sept 2026, 01:17
21,495
-30
3 Sept 2026, 21:22
21,525
-19
2 Sept 2026, 09:53
21,544
-4
1 Sept 2026, 06:56
21,548
-4
31 Aug 2026, 03:25
21,552
-1
30 Aug 2026, 03:57
21,553
-8
29 Aug 2026, 04:13
21,561
-14
28 Aug 2026, 04:59
21,575
-5
27 Aug 2026, 01:46
21,580
-7
26 Aug 2026, 04:11
21,587
-12
25 Aug 2026, 03:13
21,599
-9
23 Aug 2026, 19:38
21,608
first reading
Engagement
39 posts held, back to 29 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 60 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
11.7%
avg views ÷ 21,180 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,480
7 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.83%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
7
of 39 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 October 2026
Posts held
39 (29 June 2026 – 9 October 2026)
Views total
17,356
Reactions total
317
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
9 Oct 2026, 19:41 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
39
Videos
13
Links
571
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
1,746 reactions across 37 posts, in 27 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
874
50.1%
👍
298
17.1%
💯
117
6.70%
🔥
96
5.50%
⚡
70
4.01%
🤝
62
3.55%
🏆
60
3.44%
👏
42
2.41%
🌚
35
2.00%
❤🔥
26
1.49%
👌
16
0.916%
😍
6
0.344%
✍
5
0.286%
🎉
5
0.286%
🤩
5
0.286%
🥰
5
0.286%
🍾
4
0.229%
😁
4
0.229%
😈
3
0.172%
🙏
3
0.172%
7 further kinds
10
0.573%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 37 of the 39 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,746 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 39 most recent posts we hold, published 29 June 2026 to 9 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 37 we hold a reading for · 3%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @TheEdenApple. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 39 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 29 June 2026 to 9 October 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
🎬New project.
I launched a YouTube channel where you live real history from the inside.
Start with this one: 1915, Shackleton's ship is crushed by the ice. 28 men stranded on a frozen ocean, no radio, no rescue. He brings every single one of them home alive.
The best lesson in leadership I know, in 10 minutes.
https://youtu.be/pbOJt7uo-WQ?is=j9z9JDI4DOnn0ecd
If you like it, subscribe. One new episode every week.
To answer a question I get asked all the time:
1. The new "Texts So Good" (my bestseller):
Main ebook: 74 pages + 3 bonuses
👉 https://edenapple.gumroad.com/l/SeduceCleopatra_TextsSoGOODSheCANTIgnore/
2. "Texts So Good 2" (advanced texting) :
Main ebook: 82 pages + 3 bonuses.
👉 https://edenapple.gumroad.com/l/how-to-text-women/
3. "What Women Want From Men" (2026 version, female psychology) :
Main ebook 71 pag…
🤥Men, if your girl hits you with "Babe, he is just a FRIEND"
Just say, "Put him on SPEAKER and tell him you are HORNY."
Watch what HAPPENS. Watch the WHOLE movie COLLAPSE in 5 seconds.
A man and a woman CANNOT be just FRIENDS. It is BIOLOGICALLY impossible. One of them ALWAYS wants to F*CK. And 99 percent of the time, it is HIM.
He is NOT her friend.
He is a WAITING dick.
A backup PLAN.
A guy in the FRIENDZONE pa…
• You will REGRET it if you get MARRIED.
• You will REGRET it if you do NOT get married.
• You will REGRET it if you have KIDS.
• You will REGRET it if you do NOT.
⚡️Whatever you CHOOSE, you will REGRET it.
Because the problem is NOT in your choices, it is in romanticizing a life you NEVER lived.
EVERYONE IS REGRETTING SOMETHING.
Listen Brother. Life is NOT about being regret FREE. It is about choosing your REGR…
( Start reading: https://t.me/TheEdenApple/919 )
Let her be mean to the next man too when she finds a newer option than him. Because a woman who cheats does not change men, she just changes the man she is mean to.
You deserve softness. You deserve loyalty. You deserve a woman who is mean to the world but soft to you, not soft to the world and mean to you.
If she is mean to you while you give her loyalty, she is sw…
❤️When a woman is messing with more than one man, she gets mean to the one she is LYING to.
Read that again. Let it sink deep into your soul.
Brother, if you feel her energy shifting, if you feel her getting cold, mean, distant, disrespectful for no reason, it is not random. It is guilt. It is projection. It is confession through behavior.
A woman who is loyal to you is soft to you. She is sweet to you. She is war…
🧠Men, once you start dealing with a woman who is NOT damaged or in a survival mode, You will literally enjoy being in a relationship.
Because 90% of men have only dealt with two types of women.
Type 1: The Damaged Woman.
Type 2: The Survival Mode Woman.
The damaged woman is carrying trauma from her father, from her ex, from 10 men who used her. She is broken. She doesn't trust you. She is insecure. She checks your…
( Start here: https://t.me/TheEdenApple/916 )
So she moves on fast and calls it “healing” and “self-love.”
SO WHAT’S THE LESSON?
If you can’t move on after a breakup, stop lying to yourself with “it was true love, I just love deep.”
Ask honestly: “Do I have options? If three other girls wanted me right now, would I still be crying over her?”
If the answer is no, your problem isn’t heartbreak. It’s a lack of opti…
🤡90% of men don’t have options. 99% of women do.
That’s why men don’t move on after a breakup. They just hide their scarcity behind the label of “true love.”
Walk outside. Look at men.
90% of them wake up and no girl has texted. No girl checked their story hoping for a post. No girl is waiting to say yes. He has to WORK for every option he’ll ever get.
Two years in the gym to get noticed.
Five years building mone…
Dear Men,
If a woman leaves you, NEVER let her back in.
Not even if you still love her.
If she left once, she’ll leave again. It’s not a question of IF. It’s a question of WHEN.
When a woman leaves you, she didn’t just leave the house. She left your heart, your vision, your name, your future. She looked at everything you built together, everything you sacrificed, and decided “This isn’t enough. HE isn’t enough. I…
Let that sink in before you marry same age and become another divorce statistic arguing about who forgot to take trash while your polarity dies.
👍23❤8💯8⚡5🔥4🌚1😍1
Showing the 12 most recent of 39 posts we hold for @TheEdenApple. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
If I built one of these, which would you actually pay for?
AI App that tell you what to text back38%
Tool that rates and fixes your dating profile14%
Honest breakdown of why your dates go nowhere19%
System that reads her signal for you53%
The shares total 124%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 39 most recent posts we hold, published 29 June 2026 to 9 October 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 24 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
🚨The Brotherhood🚨 @ourbrohood · 21,955 Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 22 September 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 October 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.