Channel
@mrseduceher
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
10,529subscribers
+499 since we began measuring on 27 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001506504186 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @mrseduceher |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 27 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 30 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 36 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 30 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/mrseduceher |
Marketing & affiliate — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 86% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 30 Oct 2026, 09:37 | 10,529 | +17 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 08:21 | 10,512 | +7 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 10:11 | 10,505 | -1 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 06:36 | 10,506 | -2 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 08:19 | 10,508 | +7 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 05:41 | 10,501 | -1 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 03:20 | 10,502 | +9 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 02:20 | 10,493 | +11 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 22:16 | 10,482 | +14 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 16:11 | 10,468 | +16 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 17:10 | 10,452 | +10 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 17:28 | 10,442 | +4 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 15:57 | 10,438 | +7 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 14:37 | 10,431 | +2 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 14:29 | 10,429 | +4 |
| 14 Oct 2026, 13:28 | 10,425 | +1 |
| 13 Oct 2026, 03:26 | 10,424 | +34 |
| 8 Oct 2026, 21:56 | 10,390 | +58 |
| 4 Oct 2026, 09:37 | 10,332 | +104 |
| 25 Sept 2026, 17:59 | 10,228 | first reading |
28 posts held, back to 25 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 28 posts for this entry, the most recent from 28 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
122 reactions across 23 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 56.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤🔥 | 69 | 56.6% | |
| 🔥 | 29 | 23.8% | |
| 💯 | 24 | 19.7% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 23 of the 28 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 122 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 28 most recent posts we hold, published 25 August 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
One of our students who started 2 months ago already makes between 800 and 1200 in PROFIT every day You can make thousands per day if you follow the correct system And you don’t need to “know girls” or even interact with them in real life Everything can be done remotely Learn here👇:One of our students who started 2 months ago already makes between 800 and 1200 in PROFIT every day You can make thousands per day i…
An attractive woman sees a normal guy the same as you see a woman with down syndrome THE SAME WAY. Baddies don't even acknowledge the existence of a man unless he's at least one of these things: - Self made rich - Super handsome - Born in a wealthy family - Popular If you don't tick any of these boxes and you're an average guy with an average story and average lifestyle - you're invisible for 7's, 8's and 9's and…
The best way to start making over 20.000 dollars per month is by managing models on webcam. I know people talk about OnlyFans management, but in the last 2 years, very few people have succeeded in that industry. There’s the 0.01% of models who make 200k per month and lots and lots of models who make 0, who get no subscribers, get no traffic. The only way to make money on OF right now is if the model gets viral on I…
What every young man should prioritise: 1. Lose your virginity and get a girlfriend early. Go through the full emotional rollercoaster of teenage/young-adult love - the highs, the heartbreaks, the awkwardness. Guys who miss this phase often end up socially off as adults. 2. Move out your parents house and learn to depend less on them. Even the small stuff like washing your clothes, paying your bills, making some mo…
❤🔥3
There's women out there who fuck and give all the money to their man Women who wait 10 years in the house while their men are in prison Women who raise kids and shut up while their man is with hoes And you're simping over some worm chick that has opinions THINK OF IT.
🔥6💯3
You can find out the winners and losers pretty early in life. But the issue is, You develop this ABILITY only later in life, when you’re older. Because you see patterns play out. You see certain types of guys always winning, and you see certain types of guys always struggling. and you reach a point where you can look at any 18 year old guy and tell with a pretty good accuracy whether he will be a winner or a lo…
💯1
Today I formerly apologize for what I am going to do next from here on in life. Because I'm officially moving over to the other side where I am ONLY going to be dealing with A players, badasses, and hardworking men who pick up the phone and get on with it. To the guys who have been following me for YEARS now but are still stuck because they haven't taken action, because they have gotten comfortable, because they want…
❤🔥5
Well, the person I lost very much had a clock ticking for him, and he still gave it his all until his dying breath. I truly understand now why most people are where they are. They deserve it. I have to apologize to the lazy and the arrogant, to the people who believe in sloth, to the people who procrastinate, and to the people who need motivation. I apologize because I was too nice to you guys. I was trying to motiva…
a great way to test how deep a woman is sexually into you is to throw something sexually provocative. for example, I love asking women what their favorite position is. I don’t mention “bed”, I leave it upto their imagination. And I make sure I say that only after I know there is a vibe, to not come across “creepy” Her and I will be teasing, bantering, and I will say some version of: “Gosh, you’re such a wimp. I…
There are people with half your skills and intelligence living out your dreams, just because they put themselves out there and didn’t overthink it.
❤🔥7
Women are "hoes" in 2026 which means it's easier to hire webcam models and print cash if you own a WEBCAM AGENCY Think of it like this, every woman from 18 to 25 that is at least cute has the following mindset: - Nobody wants to be wife, nobody wants kids - Unless their parents are rich they'd do anything to make some fast cash - Nobody wants to work regular jobs - No inhibitions, they already show 90% of their …
💯1
I wish someone told my younger self to focus more time on brothers, not friends. Most people will add no value to your life. They will just waste your time and you'll likely end up developing bad habits. The few brothers you find along your journey will make life much more enjoyable. And you'll become a winner in the process (because your brother will simply refuse to let you be a loser)
💯7
Showing the 12 most recent of 28 posts we hold for @mrseduceher. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 12 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“🚨DATING INTELLIGENCE🚨” (@mrseduceher), 10,529 subscribers as measured 30 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mrseduceher.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.