Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for The Masculine Alliance | πŸ”₯βš”οΈ

Channel

The Masculine Alliance | πŸ”₯βš”οΈ

@TMAUK

On this record: Growth Β· Engagement Β· Reactions Β· Posts Β· Cite this entry

10,347subscribers

+9 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001571495163
TypeChannel
Username@TMAUK
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023β€” estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live23 August 2026
Measurements held16
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 23 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/TMAUK

Growth

10,33810,35210,3457 August 2026 β€” 10,338 subscribers7 August 2026 β€” 10,338 subscribers8 August 2026 β€” 10,343 subscribers9 August 2026 β€” 10,345 subscribers10 August 2026 β€” 10,339 subscribers11 August 2026 β€” 10,340 subscribers12 August 2026 β€” 10,341 subscribers13 August 2026 β€” 10,345 subscribers15 August 2026 β€” 10,344 subscribers16 August 2026 β€” 10,348 subscribers17 August 2026 β€” 10,349 subscribers18 August 2026 β€” 10,351 subscribers19 August 2026 β€” 10,347 subscribers20 August 2026 β€” 10,350 subscribers21 August 2026 β€” 10,352 subscribers23 August 2026 β€” 10,347 subscribers10,3477 August 202623 August 2026
16 measurements spanning 16 days, net +9. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between β€” snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean β€œno change observed”, never β€œinterpolated”. The vertical axis spans 10,336–10,354 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log β€” every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
23 Aug 2026, 07:1310,347-5
21 Aug 2026, 16:0410,352+2
20 Aug 2026, 12:5710,350+3
19 Aug 2026, 16:2610,347-4
18 Aug 2026, 18:5510,351+2
17 Aug 2026, 20:5510,349+1
16 Aug 2026, 18:2210,348+4
15 Aug 2026, 04:5710,344-1
13 Aug 2026, 18:1410,345+4
12 Aug 2026, 15:1510,341+1
11 Aug 2026, 17:0210,340+1
10 Aug 2026, 16:0110,339-6
9 Aug 2026, 17:4210,345+2
8 Aug 2026, 14:2610,343+5
7 Aug 2026, 12:3110,338no change
7 Aug 2026, 12:2910,338first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 15 August 2025 β€” the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 25 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute β€” we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 September 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

652 reactions across 20 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❀22234.0%
πŸ’―21633.1%
πŸ”₯12619.3%
❀‍πŸ”₯517.82%
πŸ‘223.37%
🀯91.38%
🍾30.46%
πŸ’Š30.46%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β€” πŸ™ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β€” so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β€” 4.34K, 1.2M β€” so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post β€” not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β€” those same posts carry 652reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by β€œa reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 15 August 2025 to 7 September 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Sept 2025, 10:28 UTCβ‰ˆ11,800 views38 reactionsread 23 August 2026

Just sent out an email on why I’ve been gone. Recommended reading.

πŸ’―20❀13🀯5

5 Sept 2025, 15:13 UTCβ‰ˆ11,900 views18 reactionsread 23 August 2026

The most important thing a man can learn in the 21st century? Female psychology. Why do women act the way they do? Think the way they think? Want the things they want? I break it all down inside my 100% FREE eBook: https://mastergame.gumroad.com/l/YourSeductionStarterKit?layout=profile

❀14πŸ’―3πŸ”₯1

2 Sept 2025, 16:12 UTCβ‰ˆ9,240 views62 reactionsread 23 August 2026

You know you’ve won, when they increase the volum of their voice, but not the logic of their argument.

❀‍πŸ”₯30πŸ’―15πŸ”₯9❀7πŸ’Š1

1 Sept 2025, 16:28 UTCβ‰ˆ8,890 views53 reactionsread 23 August 2026

Women ignore guys they easily can have, and chase those they easily can’t. To get a woman, you therefore, have to stand out. Your competition is all doing the same: complement her eyes and asks stupid questions like β€œSooo, HoW's YoUr dAy beeN?” But that’s boring. Women are tired of it, because they know it’s fake – they know these guys only want to get in ther pants. Instead, disqualify her: β€œWe’d be such a great…

❀36πŸ”₯8πŸ’―4🍾3πŸ‘2

28 Aug 2025, 06:59 UTCβ‰ˆ6,600 views20 reactionsread 23 August 2026

I think guys talk themselves out of sex more than they get rejected. They bring up some stupid topic – like their job, bitcoin, or politics – which is totally boring for women; like a tax seminar in a windowless room. Women just want to have fun. Be exciting = get laid. Getting laid can therefore be boiled down to a pretty simple formula: make her feel something real, something unexpected; add some light teasing, …

πŸ’―11❀9

27 Aug 2025, 15:38 UTCβ‰ˆ5,440 views11 reactionsread 23 August 2026

Did you know I’ve written a 100% FREE eBook that breaks down everything you need to know about female psychology in dating? Well, now you know. You can get access here: https://mastergame.gumroad.com/l/YourSeductionStarterKit?layout=profile

❀7πŸ”₯3πŸ’―1

27 Aug 2025, 07:17 UTCβ‰ˆ4,800 views42 reactionsread 23 August 2026

If you spend too much time with something, you’ll grow to like it. This goes for sadness, chasing a woman who is obviously not into you, or isolation. You have to cut out such toxicity before it becomes a part of your identity.

❀23πŸ’―15πŸ”₯4

26 Aug 2025, 16:00 UTCβ‰ˆ4,990 views13 reactionsread 23 August 2026

Statistically speaking, women leave relationships first. The #1 reason for breakups? Cheating. Why do women cheat? Because of bad s*x. The solution? My ebook, The S*x Playbook: https://mastergame.gumroad.com/l/TSP?layout=profile

πŸ’―9❀‍πŸ”₯4

26 Aug 2025, 04:13 UTCβ‰ˆ4,460 views48 reactionsread 23 August 2026

If she starts pulling away or getting cold for no particular reason, then bet on it β€” ANOTHER GUY HAS ENTERED THE PICTURE.

πŸ’―32πŸ”₯12❀4

25 Aug 2025, 16:08 UTCβ‰ˆ4,520 views7 reactionsread 23 August 2026

Until you understand what women are attracted to you’ll continue to have piss-poor results with women. Luckily, female attraction can be broken down into simple, clear components. And that’s excatly what I’ve done inside my ebook, Laws Of Seduction: https://mastergame.gumroad.com/l/Lawsofseduction?layout=profile

❀4πŸ’Š2πŸ’―1

23 Aug 2025, 15:31 UTCβ‰ˆ3,670 views40 reactionsread 23 August 2026

The more you like a woman, the more you should avoid flattering her. Why? Because if you want to keep a woman intrigued, you can’t overindulging her ego. And don’t overcomplicate this. Just think about it for a second. When someone is always showered with compliments, the compliments lose value. That makes sense, right? The more accessible something is, the less valuable it becomes. You follow that logic, right?…

❀20πŸ’―11πŸ”₯9

23 Aug 2025, 06:27 UTCβ‰ˆ3,240 views42 reactionsread 23 August 2026

The only way to know the true character of a person is to see how they treat someone who can do them absolutely no good. How do people treat people who can’t give them anything of value? The answer to that also reveals their true character.

πŸ”₯25πŸ’―8❀5❀‍πŸ”₯4

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @TMAUK. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β‰ˆ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β€” t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β‰ˆ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 23 August 2026 β€” this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

β€œThe Masculine Alliance | πŸ”₯βš”οΈβ€ (@TMAUK), 10,347 subscribers as measured 23 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/TMAUK.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.