Channel
@unmodernmtg
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
5,665subscribers
+201 since we began measuring on 28 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001713080124 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @unmodernmtg |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 28 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 1 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 18 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 1 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/unmodernmtg |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 13 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 80% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1 Nov 2026, 21:31 | 5,665 | +1 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 14:11 | 5,664 | +1 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 06:27 | 5,663 | +7 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 10:37 | 5,656 | +8 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 07:05 | 5,648 | +4 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 13:56 | 5,644 | -8 |
| 14 Oct 2026, 07:36 | 5,652 | +44 |
| 10 Oct 2026, 21:39 | 5,608 | +10 |
| 4 Oct 2026, 17:20 | 5,598 | +46 |
| 24 Sept 2026, 20:36 | 5,552 | +18 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 02:41 | 5,534 | +19 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 20:20 | 5,515 | +7 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 00:57 | 5,508 | +15 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 20:56 | 5,493 | +11 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 05:45 | 5,482 | +20 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 09:36 | 5,462 | -2 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 02:45 | 5,464 | no change |
| 28 Aug 2026, 02:30 | 5,464 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 23 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 28 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
142 reactions across 20 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 73.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 105 | 73.9% | |
| 🔥 | 21 | 14.8% | |
| 🥰 | 8 | 5.63% | |
| 👍 | 5 | 3.52% | |
| 👏 | 3 | 2.11% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 142 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 23 August 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Finding a purpose is easy: A. Take stock of your current state of conditions. B. Fantasise an ideal state of condition (doesn't matter if short-term). Then make decisions that help you move from A to B. Once achieved, set another purpose, this time with a longer timeframe. The difficulty is in ACHIEVING the purpose. One way is to live in contempt or oppression - it develops intensity to escape. For eg: People …
❤1
If someone poses as a friend but talks behind your back, then they are no friend. There's no reason why you should interact with such people unless your line of work demands you to. So this thread assumes you are forced to interact with these individuals regularly. The first & most common (stupid) reason someone poses as a friend but talks badly behind your back, is because of jealousy. You have something they do…
❤1
If you really want to become a self-determined man, unshakable from attaining his purpose, then the prospect of finding your true love is out of the question. You don't get the luxury of looking for love. Nor should you want to. It makes you weak, inefficient and stupid. Women can afford to fall in love. They can afford to feel the uncontrollable sensation of positive and negative emotions that make them act out …
❤5
2How To Improve Your Chances Of Winning You keep calling it potential. That quiet feeling that you are meant for more. That sense that your life should be sharper by now. That frustration when you look at your habits, your money, your relationships, your discipline, your body, your confidence, and know you are not where you should be. You tell yourself you are young. You tell yourself you still have time. You …
❤2👍1
Character is easy to fake when a man has no options. Poverty can look like humility. Fear can look like discipline. Social weakness can look like morality. Wait until he has money, access, sexual options, and the freedom to sin without consequence. Abundance does not corrupt nearly as often as it reveals.
❤7🔥4
The greatest social trap is being useful without a cost. It leaves you open to exploitation. People will rely on you, summon you, and still undervalue you because you help without a cost. Value must be paired with a cost in order to leverage it for power, respect or authority.
❤9🔥1
Morality is the act of doing good, and cannot coexist with self-interest. Immorality is the act of malevolent creativity. Amorality is acting in interest, with no regard to good or evil. A person doing a moral act cannot expect any benefit from it. But when both parties benefit; it becomes an amoral act. If the act leads to the recipients harm, then its immoral. True morality is extremely rare. The morality …
❤3🔥1
The road to power is paved with Cunning and Boldness. The Forbidden Archive (click here) will teach you Cunning. Testosterine Cypionate will give you Boldness.
❤4
There is no good or bad, moral or immoral in this world. There is efficient or inefficient. People change their behavior on the basis of efficiency. Good people can be selfish. Nice people can be exploitative. Loyal people can betray. Incentives expose complexity.
❤1
Faking confidence can actually make you more confident. Every time you act braver than you feel, you are engaging neural pathways that eventually makes it real. There is evidence supporting neuroplastic changes in brain upon thought, visualisation and even fake-action. You start with lying to yourself so you can be real with the world.
❤5🔥2
Moral intentions are a weak framework. People behave better when incentives are in support of their behavior. Remove reward, consequence, reputation, and accountability, then watch morality become negotiable. Never with people around the hope that they everyone will be virtuous. Virtue must be incentivized.
❤5👏3🔥2
The weakest position in life is needing someone to understand you. Clarity is expensive when begged for. Closure is humiliating when demanded. Sometimes the most intelligent response is to accept what their actions already proved and leave without an explanation
❤11
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @unmodernmtg. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 11 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 1 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Power & Will - Machiavelli Bot” (@unmodernmtg), 5,665 subscribers as measured 1 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/unmodernmtg.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.