Channel
@illimitableman
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry
11,232subscribers
+69 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001950045718 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @illimitableman |
| Description | Rallying against delusion, sophistry and low truth preference. Pro patriarchy, pro masculinity, pro logic, pro beauty. Get more info: gumroad.com/a/125915347/YOUiS |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 21 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 15 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 21 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/illimitableman |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 21 Aug 2026, 21:09 | 11,232 | +3 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 20:36 | 11,229 | +5 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 19:14 | 11,224 | -2 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 20:48 | 11,226 | +1 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 20:04 | 11,225 | +1 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 08:35 | 11,224 | +10 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 02:37 | 11,214 | +17 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 17:17 | 11,197 | -1 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 19:32 | 11,198 | +15 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 16:42 | 11,183 | +6 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 14:22 | 11,177 | +7 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 13:11 | 11,170 | +3 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:33 | 11,167 | +4 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 11:30 | 11,163 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 11:20 | 11,163 | first reading |
97 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 27 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 22 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 97 (4 August 2026 – 22 August 2026) |
| Views total | 58,586 |
| Reactions total | 1,684 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 22 Aug 2026, 15:09 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 22 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
1,684 reactions across 97 posts, in 20 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 49.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 💯 | 833 | 49.5% | |
| ❤ | 555 | 33.0% | |
| ✍ | 69 | 4.10% | |
| 🔥 | 53 | 3.15% | |
| 👍 | 52 | 3.09% | |
| 🤝 | 35 | 2.08% | |
| 💋 | 18 | 1.07% | |
| ⚡ | 14 | 0.831% | |
| ❤🔥 | 13 | 0.772% | |
| 🌚 | 11 | 0.653% | |
| 🌭 | 10 | 0.594% | |
| 😇 | 6 | 0.356% | |
| 👏 | 4 | 0.238% | |
| 🏆 | 3 | 0.178% | |
| 😁 | 2 | 0.119% | |
| 😘 | 2 | 0.119% | |
| 🎉 | 1 | 0.059% | |
| 👀 | 1 | 0.059% | |
| 😎 | 1 | 0.059% | |
| 🤪 | 1 | 0.059% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 97 of the 97 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,684reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 97 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 22 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
When women win, everyone loses, women included. They are masochists with a penchant for self-destruction and will destroy themselves as well as any who would help them – if you let them.
👍2
When you’re in a relationship with a woman, you must drag her up or she’ll drag you down.
💯6
For all her wiles and prowess in charming and deceiving others, womankind isn’t so good at decision-making. The reason she’s great at the former is the same reason she’s poor at the latter, she’s evolved to “fit in”, not to evaluate with, nor value reason.
❤5✍1
Behind every messed up young woman who had potential is a man who broke her heart, or a misandrist harpy whispering venom into her ears.
💯9
A woman with confidence issues can get a quality man because it’s a passive, feminine trait. Boldness is man’s burden.
💯8❤2
t’s hard for a child to understand the existential pressures of being an adult. To a lesser degree albeit significant degree, the same is true of women with men.
❤4💯2💋1
Her need to feel safe should outweigh her infantishly narcissistic need to be in charge of things she doesn’t want to be held responsible for.
❤9💯3
Give a woman less attention than she wants, and she will desire it. Give her as much of it as she wants, and she will not. Women quickly devalue the attention of a man who would attend to her every whim, so be frugal; it is easy for a man to be too generous, but near impossible for him to be too frugal.
❤8👍2
A difference in narcissism (female gratitude and male arrogance) is the great equaliser between the beauty of the feminine form, and the lack thereof common to men. When women are equally if not more narcissistic than men, such an equaliser vanishes. Being grandiose never hindered a man’s chances of getting laid.
🤝5❤1
A man must be more narcissistic than a women to attract her. In cultures which worship women, the average woman is more narcissistic than her male counterpart, where this occurs, great swathes of men are found unattractive.
❤10💯1
Narcissism is a suit well-worn by a man, but one ill-fitting on a woman. Male narcissism is attractive to women, but female narcissism is not to man. Corollary: men with dark triad mothers are attracted to narcissistic women
✍8💯5
Women play men like Mozart played piano. Men manipulate nature, women manipulate men. Civilization is man’s project, man is woman’s.
💯14🌚5❤3
Showing the 12 most recent of 97 posts we hold for @illimitableman. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 21 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“🇬🇧 Illimitable Man 🇬🇧” (@illimitableman), 11,232 subscribers as measured 21 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/illimitableman.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.