Tezkor Yangilik Xabarlar 🌐
⚡️Фақат тасдиқланган маълумотлар, энг сўнгги тезкор хабарлар ва долзарб янгиликлар бизда!
Мурожаaт ва таклифлар
@menejerUz13
Created
25 November 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Views and reactions moved apart
On 22 of the 1,899 posts we watched over 30 days, the view counter climbed while the reaction counter stayed where it was — by more than this channel’s own reactions-per-view rate can account for. That rate, measured on this entry, is 0.0022 reactions per view.
Each interval, as we read it — views and reactions before and after
Expected is the view gain multiplied by this channel’s own prior reactions-per-view rate over the same post — not a corpus average, so a channel whose audience never reacts is compared only against itself. Every interval is credited in the direction that makes the observation harder to record, never easier: t.me renders views and reactions to three significant figures above ~1,000, so a raw delta can be a rendering step. Every delta below is at least 4 x the coarser reading's step, the view gain is discounted by a full step and the reaction gain credited with one. Measured by tgregister velocity.py (our own t.me/s/ readings).
What this does and does not say. It says the two counters moved apart, by more than rounding and more than this channel’s own history predicts. It asserts no cause. Views arriving from outside Telegram, an embedded or forwarded copy of the post, and a burst of readers who simply do not react all produce this shape. This detector has recorded very few observations across the whole register, and its precision has not been measured; treat it as an anomaly worth looking at, not as a finding.
Recorded under the key view_reaction_decoupling, last confirmed 11 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Growth
63 measurements spanning 96 days, net +65,220. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,022,564–1,216,669 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 63
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
10 Nov 2026, 16:44
1,118,756
+12,258
9 Nov 2026, 03:48
1,106,498
-6,579
7 Nov 2026, 17:06
1,113,077
-6,091
6 Nov 2026, 14:01
1,119,168
-6,070
5 Nov 2026, 11:07
1,125,238
-6,063
4 Nov 2026, 09:09
1,131,301
-161
3 Nov 2026, 06:34
1,131,462
+8,663
2 Nov 2026, 04:29
1,122,799
-5,461
1 Nov 2026, 04:30
1,128,260
-5,478
31 Oct 2026, 04:08
1,133,738
-4,600
30 Oct 2026, 07:38
1,138,338
-5,218
29 Oct 2026, 09:20
1,143,556
-6,705
28 Oct 2026, 04:49
1,150,261
-3,853
27 Oct 2026, 02:16
1,154,114
-5,167
26 Oct 2026, 01:29
1,159,281
-7,500
24 Oct 2026, 22:25
1,166,781
-6,753
23 Oct 2026, 21:40
1,173,534
-5,211
23 Oct 2026, 00:09
1,178,745
-890
22 Oct 2026, 01:58
1,179,635
+7,059
20 Oct 2026, 21:27
1,172,576
first reading
What this channel posts
Photos
≈66,700
Videos
≈56,000
Links
≈33,800
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
11h 38m
Average length
1m 12s
Measured directly from 585 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
View velocity
How fast this channel’s own posts pick up views, from re-reading them repeatedly in the hours and days after they were published rather than the single reading most entries on this register get. Coverage is early and only a small minority of channels hold it at all — a gap in this section means the post has not been re-read again yet, not that nothing happened.
Computed from 1,910 of this channel’s own posts over the last 30 days (382 of the 24-hour readings behind this are interpolated, not measured directly): across 1,837 of this channel’s own posts with a clear reading, a typical one reaches half of its last-observed view count within 2.6 hours of being posted; a typical post has already reached 33.0% of its 24-hour view count within the first hour, and 73.9% within the first six; the median 24-hour reach across those posts is 85,100 views — 7.61% of this channel’s own subscriber count (90th percentile 100,000).
8 most recently posted, with a view-velocity reading
60 minutes: 30,545 interp.still climbing at last reading
not yet at 24h
38 minutesprovisional — final view count still climbing
Curve is every standard checkpoint we hold a reading for (+1h, +3h, +6h, +12h, +24h, +48h, +7d after posting) — measured where a real reading landed close enough to that age, interpolated where it did not but readings on both sides let one be worked out between them. Nothing is ever extrapolated past the last real reading. Latest reading is the newest view and reaction count we hold for the post, side by side, so a gap between how views and reactions moved is visible without following it into the Observations section above. 24h reach is that one checkpoint on its own, labelled the same way. Half of last-observed views is the age at which a post’s view count crossed half of the highest figure we have read for it so far — an upper bound when the very first reading was already past half (we cannot see the actual crossing), and biased low while the post is still climbing, since “half of final” is dividing by a number that has not finished growing yet. Both caveats are printed inline wherever they apply, never silently dropped.
Reaction mix
296,756 reactions across 1,000 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
89,997
30.3%
👍
74,777
25.2%
🤬
30,788
10.4%
😁
30,627
10.3%
👎
25,288
8.52%
😢
14,491
4.88%
😱
13,025
4.39%
👏
6,586
2.22%
💯
4,563
1.54%
🔥
3,901
1.31%
💔
1,251
0.422%
🤩
585
0.197%
🙏
483
0.163%
😍
394
0.133%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 1,000 of the 1,000 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 296,756 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 26 October 2026 to 11 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
222
across the posts below
Posts paid on
19
of 1,000 we hold a reading for · 2%
Most on one post
190
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @TYXUZBEK. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold for this entry (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 26 October 2026 to 11 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
ГЕМОРРОЙИМ БОРГАН САРИ ТАШҚАРИГА ЧИҚИБ, ТИНМАЙ АЖРАЛМА ЧИҚАР ЭДИ.
Иштоним доғ бўлиб қолаётгани учун, кўчага чиқишга уялар эдим😔
Бир кун шу мазни тайёрлаб суртиб кўрган эдим...
✅Ажралма чиқиши уша куннинг ўзида тўхтади.
✅Геморрой оғриғи йўқ бўлди.
✅Ҳатто тугунларим ҳам йўқ бўлди.
Мазни қандай тайёрлаб суртганимни шу ерда ёзиб қолдирдим👇👇👇
https://www.tabobat.org/eli/?r=5
https://www.tabobat.org/eli/?r=5
https://www…
🇨🇳 Хитойда эркак компенсация можароси сабаб ҳукумат биносига ҳужум қилди
Хитойнинг Сиан шаҳрида бир эркак тўланмаган компенсация пуллари сабаб ҳукумат биносига ҳужум қилди. У қарийб бир соат давомида бинонинг эшиклари, зинапоялари ва фасадига зарар етказган. Оқибатда бинонинг камида олти қисми шикастланган. Ходимлар зудлик билан эвакуация қилинган. Эркакни қўлга олиш учун 20 га яқин махсус куч ходими жалб этилган.
…
Ҳайдовчини ҳақорат қилган ЙПХ инспектори лавозимидан четлатилди
Тошкент шаҳрида ҳайдовчига қўпол муомала қилиб, уни ҳақорат қилган ЙПХ инспектори лавозимидан четлатилди. Унга нисбатан хизмат текшируви тайинланган.
Маълум қилинишича, воқеа 8 ноябрь куни Шаҳрисабз кўчасида содир бўлган. ЙПХ инспектори ҳаракат қоидасини бузган ҳайдовчини тўхтатган. Улар ўртасидаги тортишув давомида кичик сержант Раимов ҳайдовчини ҳақо…
БЎҒИМЛАРИМНИ 3 КУНДА ТЎЛИҚ ТИКЛАЙ ОЛДИМ😱
Мен бу дарддан уй шароитида, арзон ва табиий восита ёрдамида халос бўлдим.
Энг ҳайратланарлиси — 3 кунда натижа!
Ҳар куни азобланиш, оғриқ билан юриш, ўйқувсизлик — энди ўтмишда қолди!
ШУ ТАБИИЙ ВОСИТА МЕНИ НОГИРОНЛИКДАН АСРАБ ҚОЛДИ👇👇👇👇
➡️ https://tabobat.org/ost/?r=1
➡️ https://tabobat.org/ost/?r=1
➡️ https://tabobat.org/ost/?r=1
.
Агар терингизда қора доғлар бўлса ушбу рецептни бажариб кўринг.
Яқинларингизга ҳам улашинг!
👉 @tyxuzbek - энг тезкор ва махфий хабарлар каналига аъзо бўлинг!
ҚАНДЛИ ДИАБЕТИМ 10 ЙИЛДАН БЕРИ 40 ДАН ПАСГА ТУШМАС ЭДИ.
❌Оёғимдаги ярам борган сари катталашар эди...
👁Кўзим эса ёмон кўришни бошлаган эди...
Кореялик профессор ўзининг малҳамидан тайёрлаб мени 1 КУНДА даволаб берид. Улар бу рецептни сир сақлашар экан. Шунинг учун улар қариса ҳам соғлом юришар экан.
✅Оёғимдаги ярам битиб, кўзим ҳам жуда яхши кўришни бошлади.
Малҳам Рецептини шу ерда ёзиб қолдирдим👇👇👇
https://tab…
Касаллик қаердан бошланади?
Барча касалликлар ичаклардан бошланади. Шунинг учун видеони кўринг ва касал бўлманг 🌱
Яқинларга юбориб қўямиз
👉 @tyxuzbek - энг тезкор ва махфий хабарлар каналига аъзо бўлинг!
30 КУНДА 30 КИЛО ЙЎҚОЛДИ!
ОЗИШНИ ТАБИИЙ ЙЎЛИ ТОПИЛДИ!😱
Диета тутдим, спорт билан шуғулландим - натижа бўлмади!
Аммо бир ТАБИИЙ ДАМЛАМАни ичиб 30 КИЛОга ҚИЙНОҚСИЗ ОЗДИМ.
Керак бўладиган 2 та масаллиқ СУВ + 🍵…👇👇👇👇👇
https://tabobat.org/ozish5/?r=2
https://tabobat.org/ozish5/?r=2
ШОШИЛИНГ❗️Бу маълумот вақтирча очиқ, ҳозир кирвомасангиз кейин админлар удалить қилиб юборишади!
❤25👎1
Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @TYXUZBEK. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@TYXUZBEK edited 21 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
14 August 2026
Most recent edit
10 November 2026
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 6 posts on @TYXUZBEK as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
First seen missing
21 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
25 September 2026
Median time before seen missing
2.2 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 184 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
9
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
5
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
4
vacant every time we have ever looked
@TYXUZBEK named 9 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Evidenced gone
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
@ayoliar_dunyosi named in 7 posts, 6 September 2026 – 2 October 2026 · confirmed gone 22 October 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
@suhbatt_uz named in 3 posts, 8 August 2026 – 10 August 2026 · confirmed gone 13 October 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
@castlmed named in 2 posts, 9 August 2026 – 11 August 2026 · confirmed gone 1 November 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
@sibavayhacademiyasi named in 1 post, 18 August 2026 – 18 August 2026 · confirmed gone 13 October 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
@shaxsiy_rivoj_8 named in 1 post, 13 August 2026 – 13 August 2026 · confirmed gone 5 November 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@darvozaa_uz named in 12 posts, 21 August 2026 – 7 November 2026
@darvozauz_sayfullo named in 12 posts, 21 August 2026 – 7 November 2026
@soglom_oila named in 3 posts, 1 October 2026 – 8 October 2026
@sputnikuzbek named in 1 post, 18 September 2026 – 18 September 2026
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Telegram_Yulduzlari| Расмий канал @tyuzbek · 1,014,127#1
BUGUNGI GAP | Расмий канал @BugungiGap · 916,419#2
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 8 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Maxfiy Videolar! | Расмий канал @maxfiyvideolar · 29,254 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 4 September 2026
DUNYO XABARLARI @Dunyo_Xabarlari · 35,894 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 31 August 2026
Маззами. @MazzamiTG · 198 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 19 August 2026
Farzand tarbiyasi @farzand_tarbiyasi_uzb · 163,638 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 17 August 2026
FAQAT KULGU @faqat_kulgu · 106,115 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 47 here — alongside 46 others — read 15 August 2026
PRIKOL VIDEOLAR 😂🎥 @prikol_videolar · 226,694 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 11 August 2026
TibbiyotTv | OperatsiyaUzB @tibbiyottv · 22,553 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 47 here — alongside 46 others — read 18 September 2026
⏳TAQDIR IZMIDAN⌛️ @Taqdirlar_Qismatlar_Hikoyalar · 22,680 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 41 here — alongside 40 others — read 17 September 2026
AXBOROT | Yangiliklar kanali @axborotyangiliklari · 36,083 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 31 August 2026
Baxtli Oilam🌺 @BaxtliOilam_uz · 68,936 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 49 here — alongside 48 others — read 18 August 2026
Суралар ва Дуолар @Suralar_Duolar · 98,506 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 41 here — alongside 40 others — read 17 August 2026
ZARUR MASLAHATLAR @Zarur_maslahatlar · 91,589 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 50 here — alongside 49 others — read 15 August 2026
Қитмир Кампир @Qitmir_KampirTV · 98,033 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 15 August 2026
OTA ONA HAQIDA @ota_ona_haqida_statuslari · 133,241 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 13 August 2026
OTA ONA HAQIDA @Otalar_Onalar_Haqida_Kanal · 128,584 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 45 here — alongside 44 others — read 12 August 2026
Дуолар @Duo_yodlash · 142,580 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 12 August 2026
NAMANGANLIKLAR || LIVE @namanganliklarlive · 17,961 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 2 October 2026
xalqimtabobati @XalqimTabobati · 15 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 45 here — alongside 44 others — read 4 September 2026
АЁЛЛАР УЧУН @AyolIar_uchun · 101,526 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 18 August 2026
ОНАЛАР КАНАЛИ _N1 @Onalar_Kanali_Ayollar_Hikoyalar · 87,757 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 41 here — alongside 40 others — read 16 August 2026
Сардор домла @Sardor_Domla_Uz · 151,536 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 50 here — alongside 49 others — read 16 August 2026
BAXTLI OILA 💍 @Baxtli_Sherlar_Tabriklar_Ayollar · 193,132 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 38 here — alongside 37 others — read 14 August 2026
SHOHONA KULGU @ShohonaKulgu · 146,644 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 12 August 2026
DORILAR ⛑️ @Dorilar_Plus · 173,955 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 11 August 2026
This channel appears in 185 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Domains linked from posts
18 domains this channel’s own posts have linked to, measured by scanning the post bodies themselves — not the channel’s description, which is the separate Declared links section below when this entry has one. Appearing here is not a claim about who runs the linked site or why the channel linked to it; an advertisement, a news citation and a malicious link all leave the same kind of row.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Tezkor Yangiliklar ⚡” (@TYXUZBEK), 1,118,756 subscribers as measured 10 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/TYXUZBEK.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
