Tezkor Yangilik Xabarlar 🌐
⚡️Фақат тасдиқланган маълумотлар, энг сўнгги тезкор хабарлар ва долзарб янгиликлар бизда!
Мурожаaт ва таклифлар
@menejerUz13
Created
25 November 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Views and reactions moved apart
On 6 of the 433 posts we watched over 30days, the view counter climbed while the reaction counter stayed where it was — by more than this channel’s own reactions-per-view rate can account for. That rate, measured on this entry, is 0.0020 reactions per view.
Each interval, as we read it — views and reactions before and after
Expectedis the view gain multiplied by this channel’s own prior reactions-per-view rate over the same post — not a corpus average, so a channel whose audience never reacts is compared only against itself. Every interval is credited in the direction that makes the observation harder to record, never easier: t.me renders views and reactions to three significant figures above ~1,000, so a raw delta can be a rendering step. Every delta below is at least 4 x the coarser reading's step, the view gain is discounted by a full step and the reaction gain credited with one. Measured by tgregister velocity.py (our own t.me/s/ readings).
What this does and does not say.It says the two counters moved apart, by more than rounding and more than this channel’s own history predicts. It asserts no cause. Views arriving from outside Telegram, an embedded or forwarded copy of the post, and a burst of readers who simply do not react all produce this shape. This detector has recorded very few observations across the whole register, and its precision has not been measured; treat it as an anomaly worth looking at, not as a finding.
Recorded under the key view_reaction_decoupling, last confirmed 12 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Growth
7 measurements spanning 6 days, net +40,903. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,037,539–1,101,861 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Aug 2026, 06:07
1,094,439
+7,240
11 Aug 2026, 03:15
1,087,199
+8,644
10 Aug 2026, 06:36
1,078,555
+5,217
9 Aug 2026, 07:51
1,073,338
+28,377
8 Aug 2026, 07:15
1,044,961
-4,201
7 Aug 2026, 07:55
1,049,162
-4,374
6 Aug 2026, 08:16
1,053,536
first reading
Engagement
466 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
8.38%
avg views ÷ 1,094,439 subscribers
Avg views / post
91,700
466 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.304%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
466
of 466 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 465 of 466 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held
466 (6 August 2026 – 12 August 2026)
Views total
42,755,048
Reactions total
130,008
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
12 Aug 2026, 23:43 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈63,000
Videos
≈52,200
Links
≈32,300
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
6h 48m
Average length
1m 30s
Measured directly from 273 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
View velocity
How fast this channel’s own posts pick up views, from re-reading them repeatedly in the hours and days after they were published rather than the single reading most entries on this register get. Coverage is early and only a small minority of channels hold it at all — a gap in this section means the post has not been re-read again yet, not that nothing happened.
Computed from 436 of this channel’s own posts over the last 30 days (38 of the 24-hour readings behind this are interpolated, not measured directly): across 368of this channel’s own posts with a clear reading, a typical one reaches half of its last-observed view count within 2.5 hours of being posted; a typical post has already reached 32.9% of its 24-hour view count within the first hour, and 74.3% within the first six; the median 24-hour reach across those posts is 87,700 views — 8.01% of this channel’s own subscriber count (90th percentile 105,200).
8 most recently posted, with a view-velocity reading
60 minutes: 34,590 interp. → 3.0 hours: 48,738 interp. → 6.0 hours: 53,200still climbing at last reading
not yet at 24h
29 minutesprovisional — final view count still climbing
Curve is every standard checkpoint we hold a reading for (+1h, +3h, +6h, +12h, +24h, +48h, +7d after posting) — measured where a real reading landed close enough to that age, interpolated where it did not but readings on both sides let one be worked out between them. Nothing is ever extrapolated past the last real reading. Latest reading is the newest view and reaction count we hold for the post, side by side, so a gap between how views and reactions moved is visible without following it into the Observations section above. 24h reach is that one checkpoint on its own, labelled the same way. Half of last-observed viewsis the age at which a post’s view count crossed half of the highest figure we have read for it so far — an upper bound when the very first reading was already past half (we cannot see the actual crossing), and biased low while the post is still climbing, since “half of final” is dividing by a number that has not finished growing yet. Both caveats are printed inline wherever they apply, never silently dropped.
Reaction mix
125,645 reactions across 444 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
41,491
33.0%
👍
30,774
24.5%
😁
16,211
12.9%
👎
11,513
9.16%
🤬
11,175
8.89%
😢
4,938
3.93%
😱
4,148
3.30%
👏
2,281
1.82%
🔥
1,308
1.04%
💯
924
0.735%
💔
380
0.302%
🙏
316
0.252%
🤩
115
0.092%
😍
71
0.057%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 465 of the 466 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 130,008reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 466 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
14
across the posts below
Posts paid on
11
of 466 we hold a reading for · 2%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @TYXUZBEK. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 466 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 6 August 2026 to 12 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
🇷🇺 Екатеринбургда Lamborghini турар жой биносига урилиб кетди
11 август куни Екатеринбургда Lamborghini автомашинаси турар жой биносига бориб урилгани акс этган тасвирлар тарқалди.
Маълум қилинишича, ЙТҲ вақтида автомобиль бир фуқарони ҳам уриб юборган.
👉 @tyxuzbek - энг тезкор ва махфий хабарлар каналига аъзо бўлинг!
ДИАБЕТИМ 17 ДАН 5,0 ГА ТУШДИ!😱
БУНИНГ ИЛОЖИ ЙЎҚ ДЕБ ЎЙЛАРДИМ
Тонгда қўрқув билан уйғонишлар, доимий чарчоқ ва хавотирлар ортда қолди.
15 дақиқа ичида ҳаётим бутунлай ўзгарди!
ҚАНД МИҚДОРИНИ ҚАНДАЙ ҚИЛИБ МЕЪЁРГА КЕЛТИРГАНИМНИ ҲЕЧ ҚАНДАЙ СИРЛАРСИЗ ЎЗ БЛОГИМДА ЁЗИБ ҚОЛДИРДИМ❗️
👉 https://tabobat.org/d/?r=2
👉 https://tabobat.org/d/?r=2
.
ХАЙРЛИ ТОНГ!
Ассалому алайкум! Пайшанба тонги муборак бўлсин!
Бугунги бошланаётган янги кунингиз файзли ва барокатли бўлсин! Сиз ва яқинларингизни яхши кайфият асло тарк этмасин!
👉 @tyxuzbek - энг тезкор ва махфий хабарлар каналига аъзо бўлинг!
💥Бугун 13 август - Халқаро Чапақайлар куни
Психологлар чапақайларни кучли характерга эга ижодий одамлар дейдилар. Буни таниқли одамлар - жаҳон сиёсатчилари, ёзувчилар, мусиқачилар, актёрлар ва режиссёрлар мисоллари ҳам тасдиқлайди.
🎊 Барча чап қўл эгаларининг режалари амалга ошишини ва мақсадга эришишда уларга муваффақият ёр бўлишини тилаймиз.
ПС/ Ёзувни чап қўлда ёзсангиз ҳам овқатни ўнг қўлда енглар лекин:)
ЧАП…
Ҳақиқий самовий шоу: бу кеча ўзбекистонликлар 6 та сайёрани ва Персеид юлдузларининг энг юқори чўққисини кўришади, бугун биз ухламаймиз
Персеиднинг юлдуз тушиши шу кеча энг юқори чўққисига чиқади. Шарқий йўналишда соатига 100-120 метеорни кўриш мумкин ва максимал 04:56 атрофида кутилмоқда.
Тонг отгунча бир вақтнинг ўзида олтита сайёрани кузатиш мумкин бўлади: Нептун 23:30 да, уран 01:00 да, Сатурн 23:45 да, Марс 02…
🇮🇷 Эронда ўзини зўравонликдан ҳимоя қилган 24 ёшли аёл қатл этилди — ОАВ
Олти йил олдин мажбуран турмушга берилган Марзия ўз эрини ўлдиришда айбланган. ОАВ хабарларига кўра, у турмуш ўртоғи ва унинг шериги томонидан содир этилган тажовузга қаршилик кўрсатган.
Маълум қилинишича, Марзияга нисбатан суд ҳукми ижро этилган.
👉 @tyxuzbek - энг тезкор ва махфий хабарлар каналига аъзо бўлинг!
Аёлимнинг жойнамозидаги сир туфайли у билан ажрашдим😱
Чет элда ўқиб келиб, уйланиш учун қиз қидирдим ва бир зиёли оиладан ўқиган, илмли ва ақлли қиз топдим. Тўй ҳам бўлди, биз бахтли эдик. Аёлим билан намоз ўқиётганимизда, у доим бир жойнамоздан фойдаланарди. Жойнамознинг четига айлантириб мато тикиб чиқилган эди. Бошида аҳамият бермадим. Лекин бир куни:Нега бундай қилиб тикиб олгансан? — десам, айтгиси келмай гапни…
🇺🇿 Ўзбекистонда кундуз куни қуёш тўлиқ тутилиб, осмонда юлдузлар кўриниши мумкин! 😳
🌌 2060 йил 30 апрель куни Ўзбекистон ҳудудларида тўлиқ қуёш тутилиши кузатилади. Манбаларга кўра, Тошкентда тўлиқ тутилиш 16:34 атрофида содир бўлиб, тахминан 48 сония давом этиши мумкин.
🌑 Қуёшнинг тўлиқ тутилиши вақтида осмон қисқа муддатга қоронғилашиб, энг ёрқин юлдуз ва сайёраларни кўриш имкони пайдо бўлади.
2060 йил 30 апрель…
🇮🇳 Ҳиндистонда гиёҳванд модда истеъмол қилган учувчи сабаб самолёт ҳалокатга учрай ёзди
4 август куни Ҳиндистонда учувчининг хатти-ҳаракатлари сабабли самолёт ҳалокатга учрай ёзди. У гиёҳванд модда таъсирида бўлган. Бошқа бир учувчининг аралашуви сабаб воқеанинг олди олинган.
Дастлаб Air India раҳбарияти ҳодисага кучли турбулентлик сабаб бўлганини даъво қилган эди. Кейинчалик бу талқин асл ҳолатни акс эттирмагани м…
😱 ДАХШАТ
17 марта уйланган эркак ҳамма аёли билан ажрашибди
👉 @tyxuzbek - энг тезкор ва махфий хабарлар каналига аъзо бўлинг!
😁105❤45👎39🤬36😢27😱27👏19🔥10
Showing the 12 most recent of 466 posts we hold for @TYXUZBEK. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Qanday smartfondan foydalanishni istagan bo’lar edingiz?
✅ iPhone20%
✅ Samsung50%
✅ Honor15%
✅ Xiaomi9%
✅ Tecno2%
✅ Boshqa4%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 466 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 12 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 8,534 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 58 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s.When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Telegram_Yulduzlari| Расмий канал @tyuzbek · 1,050,523#1
BUGUNGI GAP | Расмий канал @BugungiGap · 1,005,767#2
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 8 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
PRIKOL VIDEOLAR 😂🎥 @prikol_videolar · 249,058 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 11 August 2026
OTA ONA HAQIDA @Otalar_Onalar_Haqida_Kanal · 150,828 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 45 here — alongside 44 others — read 12 August 2026
Дуолар @Duo_yodlash · 161,230 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 12 August 2026
SHOHONA KULGU @ShohonaKulgu · 161,226 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 12 August 2026
DORILAR ⛑️ @Dorilar_Plus · 189,830 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 11 August 2026
KASALLIKLAR TV @kasalliklartv · 202,104 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 11 August 2026
Тезкор хабарлар | Tun-u Kun @TezkorxabarUz_official · 221,457 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 11 August 2026
APTEKA_TV @apteka_tv · 229,695 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 11 August 2026
🍃 Халқ табобати 🍃 @xalqim_tabobati · 229,971 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 11 August 2026
🌱Uncha-Muncha @UnchaMuncha · 417,725 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 10 August 2026
Shoshilinch.uz - Tezkor Xabarlar | Rasmiy Kanal @ShoshilinchUz · 535,655 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 11 August 2026
Тошкент Бугун | Toshkent Bugun @toshkent_bugun · 596,713 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 8 August 2026
JONLI BOLTA — News @Jonli_Bolta · 407,857 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 10 August 2026
ANDIJON BUGUN | АНДИЖОН БУГУН @andijon_bugun · 443,023 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 10 August 2026
Ayollar Saxifasi🌷 @Ayollar_Saxifasi · 188,228 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 52 here — alongside 51 others — read 11 August 2026
Kun Xabarlar | Расмий канал @kunxabarlar · 197,524 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 11 August 2026
😂FAQAT_KULGI😂 Rasmiy @kulgi_kulgu_tiktok_instagram · 343,154 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 10 August 2026
Yaxshi Yomon | Расмий канал @Yaxshi_Yomon · 1,943,602 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 8 August 2026
TIK TOK VIDEOLAR KULGI @Tik_Tok_Prikollar_Hazillar · 266,416 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 10 August 2026
🇺🇿 Тезкор 24 || Расмий канал! @Tezkor24_Tezkor_Yangiliklar · 236,756 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 11 August 2026
O'zbekiston 24 ✅ @uzbekistan24 · 912,438 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 8 August 2026
BUGUNGI GAP | Расмий канал @BugungiGap · 1,005,767 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 8 August 2026
SOG'LOM HAYOT ️️ @SoglomHayot · 179,008 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 12 August 2026
Kun Videolari 24 | Rasmiy Kanal @Kunvideolari24 · 935,417 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 8 August 2026
This channel appears in 58 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Domains linked from posts
18 domainsthis channel’s own posts have linked to, measured by scanning the post bodies themselves — not the channel’s description, which is the separate Declared links section below when this entry has one. Appearing here is not a claim about who runs the linked site or why the channel linked to it; an advertisement, a news citation and a malicious link all leave the same kind of row.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Tezkor Yangiliklar ⚡” (@TYXUZBEK), 1,094,439 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/TYXUZBEK.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.