Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
61 measurements spanning 92 days, net +1,737. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 102,543–113,977 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 61
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
7 Nov 2026, 09:17
110,007
-22
6 Nov 2026, 06:28
110,029
+3,258
5 Nov 2026, 06:46
106,771
-520
4 Nov 2026, 05:56
107,291
-488
3 Nov 2026, 05:20
107,779
-425
2 Nov 2026, 03:16
108,204
-457
1 Nov 2026, 03:48
108,661
-483
31 Oct 2026, 03:16
109,144
-433
30 Oct 2026, 05:40
109,577
-555
29 Oct 2026, 08:59
110,132
-875
28 Oct 2026, 03:57
111,007
+231
27 Oct 2026, 01:50
110,776
+3,820
25 Oct 2026, 22:47
106,956
-225
24 Oct 2026, 20:37
107,181
-495
23 Oct 2026, 22:56
107,676
-520
22 Oct 2026, 23:38
108,196
-454
21 Oct 2026, 18:46
108,650
+2,893
20 Oct 2026, 14:44
105,757
+1,053
19 Oct 2026, 13:09
104,704
-231
18 Oct 2026, 16:16
104,935
first reading
Engagement
2,892 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 192 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
4.40%
avg views ÷ 110,007 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,840
956 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.227%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
956
of 2,892 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 928 of 956 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 November 2026
Posts held
2,892 (7 August 2026 – 7 November 2026)
Views total
4,628,016
Reactions total
10,367
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
7 Nov 2026, 18:59 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈3,390
Videos
≈4,550
Links
≈10,300
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
7h 59m
Average length
50s
Measured directly from 577 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
10,810 reactions across 962 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 72.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
7,863
72.7%
👍
1,500
13.9%
😢
651
6.02%
🔥
315
2.91%
💯
178
1.65%
👏
130
1.20%
🕊
88
0.814%
🤩
48
0.444%
🎉
26
0.241%
⚡
8
0.074%
🤝
3
0.028%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 970 of the 1,000 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 10,810 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 7 October 2026 to 7 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 11 of 956 posts held from the last 30 days (1.15%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Бундай ваҳшийликни дунё кўрмаган... ❌
Ароқ ичиб, ўзининг 3 ЁШЛИ ҚИЗИНИ зўрлаб қўйган одам ўзига келгач уни БЎҒИБ ЎЛДИРДИ ва жасадини ҳожатхонага ташлабди😣
Тўлиқ видеони хозироқ
КЎРИНГ 👇🏻
Тақводор ва ихлосли қалбларга берилувчи неъматлар
Парвардигорга ихлос билан солиҳ амаллар қилган ва тақво ила ибодат қилган қалбларни Аллоҳ қирқ неъмат билан мукаррам қилур. Бу кароматларнинг йигирматаси бу дунёда, йигирматаси охиратда берилади. Шунингдек, мазкур неъматлар ортида неча-неча ҳикматлар яширингандир. Бу дунёда берилувчи неъматлар:
1. Холис ибодат қилувчи банда доим Аллоҳни зикр қилади ва ҳамд-сано айтад…
Амаким қарзлари эвазига мени бир оилага узатиб юборди.
Ота-онам йўқ. Уларни қўлида катта бўлгандим. Турмушга чиқишни хоҳламаслигимни айтганимда улар неча йил мени боқишганини миннат қилишди. Эрим бўлмиш жуда қўпол-қўрс эркак экан. Илк кундан мени қўрқитишни уддалади.
Хонадаги ноқулай дивандан ётиб тунни ўтказдим. Тонгда юзимга тушган қаттиқ зарбдан уйғониб кетдим. Кўзимни очганимда тепамда эрим эмас. Бошқаси турарди.…
Ғассол аёл
(ТЎЛИҚ)
Аёллар ювиқчиси хикоя қилади:
Мен аёллар ювиқчисиман. Бу касбим орқали хар хил воқеаларни гувохи бўлганман.
Хозир сизларга хикоя қилиб берадиган воқеа 18 ёшли қиз билан бўлган.
Авто халокат туфайли 18 ёшли қиз вафот этди.
Маййитни ювиш учун ювиқчи чақиришди. Аммо ювиқчилар қизни ювишдан бош тортишди.
Мени чақиришди, мен 3- ювиқи эканман. Маййитни кўрдиму мен хам бош тортдим.
Қизнинг онаси фарёд қ…
Видеони кўриб кўзингизни
ёшдан тия олмайсиз 🥹
Ота - онанинг 3 ўғил ва 1 қизи бўлади. Барчасини синаб кўрмоқчи бўлишади, лекин юраклари парча - парча бўлади. Энг катта фарзандлар ота - онасини ранжитиб қайтаради, сўнгги умид кенжа фарзанддан эди, лекин кенжа фарзанд… 😣
Тўлиқ видеони кўринг,
афсусланмайсиз 👇
❤6😢2
Showing the 12 most recent of 2,892 posts we hold for @Otaduosi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@Otaduosi edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
24 September 2026
Most recent edit
24 September 2026
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 5 posts on @Otaduosi as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
First seen missing
19 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
30 October 2026
Median time before seen missing
12 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
1
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
🌙 Бугун улуғ жума кунида Пайғамбаримиз Муҳаммад Соллаллоҳу алайҳи васалламга саловатлар айтишни унутманг!
Саловат айтинг ва босинг!
📿 Аллоҳумма солли ала сайиддина Муҳаммад90%
📿 Аллоҳумма солли ала Сайиддина Муҳаммад91%
📿 Аллоҳумма солли ала Сайиддина Муҳаммад89%
📿 Аллоҳумма солли ала Сайиддина Муҳаммад92%
📿 Аллоҳумма солли ала Сайиддина Муҳаммад89%
📿 Аллоҳумма солли ала Сайиддина Муҳаммад90%
📿 Аллоҳумма солли ала Сайиддина Муҳаммад90%
📿 Аллоҳумма солли ала Сайиддина Муҳаммад92%
📿 Аллоҳумма солли ала Сайиддина Муҳаммад91%
📿 Аллоҳумма солли ала Сайиддина Муҳаммад93%
The shares total 907%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 7 October 2026 to 7 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 74 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
2
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
1
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@Otaduosi named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Evidenced gone
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
@ayoliar_dunyosi named in 8 posts, 1 September 2026 – 15 October 2026 · confirmed gone 22 October 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@soglom_oila named in 2 posts, 2 October 2026 – 7 October 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Дуолар 🤲🏼” (@Otaduosi), 110,007 subscribers as measured 7 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Otaduosi.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.