Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Notcoin Uzbekistan 🇺🇿

Channel

Notcoin Uzbekistan 🇺🇿

@uzb_notcoin_chanel

Not marked by Telegram, checked 10 August 2026

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

14,315subscribers

-1,870 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002109071736
TypeChannel
Username@uzb_notcoin_chanel
Description🛑Muhim Ushbu blog maqolalari ma'lumot olish uchun joylashtirilgan. Ular sarmoyaviy maslahat yoki tavsiyalar emas; tokenlarni sotib olish, sotish yoki ushlab turish uchun taklif deb hisoblamang. Chat: @uzb_notcoin Reklama/Ads: @sarvar_ads
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live6 November 2026
Measurements held60
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 6 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/uzb_notcoin_chanel

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 85% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

14,31516,18515,2507 August 2026 — 16,185 subscribers8 August 2026 — 16,184 subscribers8 August 2026 — 16,178 subscribers9 August 2026 — 16,172 subscribers10 August 2026 — 16,151 subscribers11 August 2026 — 16,120 subscribers12 August 2026 — 16,092 subscribers14 August 2026 — 16,070 subscribers15 August 2026 — 16,033 subscribers17 August 2026 — 16,010 subscribers18 August 2026 — 15,999 subscribers19 August 2026 — 15,976 subscribers20 August 2026 — 15,951 subscribers21 August 2026 — 15,941 subscribers22 August 2026 — 15,929 subscribers24 August 2026 — 15,901 subscribers25 August 2026 — 15,893 subscribers26 August 2026 — 15,867 subscribers27 August 2026 — 15,863 subscribers28 August 2026 — 15,851 subscribers29 August 2026 — 15,845 subscribers30 August 2026 — 15,835 subscribers31 August 2026 — 15,804 subscribers1 September 2026 — 15,758 subscribers2 September 2026 — 15,743 subscribers3 September 2026 — 15,719 subscribers6 September 2026 — 15,694 subscribers9 September 2026 — 15,655 subscribers12 September 2026 — 15,605 subscribers13 September 2026 — 15,563 subscribers15 September 2026 — 15,526 subscribers17 September 2026 — 15,497 subscribers28 September 2026 — 15,286 subscribers5 October 2026 — 15,162 subscribers9 October 2026 — 15,096 subscribers13 October 2026 — 15,020 subscribers14 October 2026 — 14,999 subscribers15 October 2026 — 14,959 subscribers16 October 2026 — 14,930 subscribers17 October 2026 — 14,865 subscribers18 October 2026 — 14,815 subscribers19 October 2026 — 14,754 subscribers20 October 2026 — 14,743 subscribers21 October 2026 — 14,696 subscribers22 October 2026 — 14,642 subscribers23 October 2026 — 14,587 subscribers24 October 2026 — 14,540 subscribers25 October 2026 — 14,510 subscribers26 October 2026 — 14,449 subscribers27 October 2026 — 14,445 subscribers28 October 2026 — 14,431 subscribers29 October 2026 — 14,418 subscribers30 October 2026 — 14,400 subscribers31 October 2026 — 14,372 subscribers1 November 2026 — 14,366 subscribers2 November 2026 — 14,354 subscribers3 November 2026 — 14,344 subscribers4 November 2026 — 14,342 subscribers5 November 2026 — 14,326 subscribers6 November 2026 — 14,315 subscribers7 August 20266 November 2026
60 measurements spanning 91 days, net -1,870. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 14,035–16,466 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 60
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Nov 2026, 18:4014,315-11
5 Nov 2026, 16:2114,326-16
4 Nov 2026, 13:1614,342-2
3 Nov 2026, 13:5414,344-10
2 Nov 2026, 13:1014,354-12
1 Nov 2026, 16:3714,366-6
31 Oct 2026, 17:3614,372-28
30 Oct 2026, 15:3014,400-18
29 Oct 2026, 14:4814,418-13
28 Oct 2026, 15:5514,431-14
27 Oct 2026, 17:1014,445-4
26 Oct 2026, 15:2814,449-61
25 Oct 2026, 12:2814,510-30
24 Oct 2026, 14:3114,540-47
23 Oct 2026, 16:0014,587-55
22 Oct 2026, 19:0914,642-54
21 Oct 2026, 12:3214,696-47
20 Oct 2026, 12:4614,743-11
19 Oct 2026, 11:0614,754-61
18 Oct 2026, 11:2714,815first reading

Engagement

47 posts held, back to 10 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 62 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
12.6%
avg views ÷ 14,315 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,810
12 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.242%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
12
of 47 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 8 of 12 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 November 2026
Posts held47 (10 June 2026 – 4 November 2026)
Views total21,667
Reactions total37
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Nov 2026, 06:01 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈1,200
Videos
≈225
Links
≈1,320

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
2m 12s
Average length
1m 06s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

223 reactions across 38 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤9442.2%
👍6026.9%
🎉3616.1%
🔥219.42%
👀52.24%
👏31.35%
🤩20.897%
🤓10.448%
🥰10.448%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 38 of the 47 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 223 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 47 most recent posts we hold, published 10 June 2026 to 4 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 47 we hold a reading for · 2%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @uzb_notcoin_chanel. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 47 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 10 June 2026 to 4 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 12 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

4 Nov 2026, 06:09 UTC637 viewsread 7 November 2026

🚀 Bugun CryptoOsh Community’da: AI va treyding Bugun soat 17:00 da yopiq guruhimizda Sarvar Rasulev sun’iy intellektni kriptoaktivlar treydingida qanday qo’llayotgani haqida gapirib beradi. 📌 Nimalar bo’ladi: • AI bilan qanday ishlaydi: qaysi vositalar, qanday jarayon • So’nggi bir oylik amaliyot: nima ishladi, nima ishlamadi • Shaxsiy tajriba va foydali xulosalar, qisqa va aniq CryptoOsh Community’da biz aynan shund…

24 Oct 2026, 12:19 UTC≈1,910 views1 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Forwarded from @soulweb

Posted without readable text

❤1

22 Oct 2026, 08:42 UTC≈2,140 views3 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

👍2❤1

17 Oct 2026, 12:12 UTC≈2,090 viewsread 7 November 2026
Forwarded from @sheriblogPoll

На этой игре обычный школьник заработал $28 млн! Интересно, как у него получилось? Жмите "Да". Как только наберется 100 голосов, я с нуля сделаю такую же игру и покажу весь процесс🦵

  1. Не интересно0%

Shares as published, totalling 0%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

14 Oct 2026, 12:54 UTC≈1,660 views3 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Forwarded from @soulweb

https://youtu.be/eNjXZZ7FfnA Video AI bilan yaratish!

🔥3

13 Oct 2026, 08:57 UTC≈1,940 views6 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

Mana rasmiy obmen qiladiganlarni narxlari

❤4👍2

12 Oct 2026, 13:06 UTC≈1,740 views7 reactionsread 7 November 2026

Takoy legkiy drop chiqdi. Oson, tez va ishonchli. Qiziqmi?

👍7

10 Oct 2026, 05:52 UTC≈2,180 views7 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

Ertaga yig'ilish Kriptichilar Kim sun'iy intellektga qiziqsa va u orqali hozir nimalar qilinvotganini ko'rib o'rganmoqchi bo'lsa ertaga kelilar! https://luma.com/x1bfm00b Shu havola orqali registratsiya qililar Manzil: IMPACT

❤5👍2

Showing the 12 most recent of 47 posts we hold for @uzb_notcoin_chanel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

17 Oct 2026, 12:12 UTCAnonymous Poll4 voters

На этой игре обычный школьник заработал $28 млн! Интересно, как у него получилось? Жмите "Да". Как только наберется 100 голосов, я с нуля сделаю такую же игру и покажу весь процесс🦵

  1. Не интересно0%

Shares as published, totalling 0%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

1 Sept 2026, 11:27 UTCAnonymous Poll160 voters

Vlog video qilmoqchiman. Qaysi ofisga borish qiziq bo‘ladi?

  1. Treding Betrader ofis61%
  2. AI 01academy Dasturlash ofis55%

The shares total 116%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

19 Jul 2026, 18:57 UTCAnonymous Poll484 voters

🇦🇷 ? : ? 🇪🇸

  1. 0:010%
  2. 1:023%
  3. 0:156%
  4. 1:313%
  5. 4:08%
  6. O’zini javob commentda8%

The shares total 118%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 47 most recent posts we hold, published 10 June 2026 to 4 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

AirDrop + Kripto Invest
@mr_bitcoin_game · 32,571
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 2 September 2026
Toncoin 🇺🇿
@toncoin_uz · 50,090
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 23 August 2026
Tony Youtuber || Gaming
@TonYOUTUBER · 21,854
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 26 here — alongside 25 others — read 24 September 2026
Telegraph Uzbekistan
@TGraphUz · 39,199
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 51 here — alongside 50 others — read 8 September 2026
Mantiqiy savollar « Bilimdon shou » 💡
@Bilimdon_intelektual_shou · 97,996
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 14 August 2026
Mirfayoz Blog | Texnobloger
@mirfayoz_blog · 97,133
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 52 here — alongside 51 others — read 16 September 2026
MK SAMANDAR 🇺🇿
@MKFOREX_VIP · 68,467
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 18 August 2026
Sardor Gang YouTube
@SardorGang · 175,313
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 24 here — alongside 23 others — read 12 August 2026
Foydalee
@foydalee · 25,812
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 16 September 2026
COIN UP 🪙
@CoinUPuz · 36,151
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 30 August 2026
Jahongir Latipov 💵
@latipovjahongir · 37,537
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 1 September 2026
ABITURIYENT 2026
@abituriyentlar_kanali2026 · 58,516
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 15 August 2026
KAZINO UZ
@aviator_omad · 238,084
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 49 here — alongside 48 others — read 2 September 2026
ULTRA PUBG
@NOTULTRAPUBGYT · 110,658
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 19 here — alongside 18 others — read 10 September 2026
«Xat-Xabar» Tezkor Yangiliklar
@XatXabar · 61,155
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 20 August 2026
Techmob.uz
@techmobuz · 23,574
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 43 here — alongside 42 others — read 15 September 2026
Xojiakbar_mominoff | Texnobloger
@xojiakbarmominoff · 304,622
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 50 here — alongside 49 others — read 16 September 2026
PHONK UZ
@Phonk_Uz · 39,722
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 49 here — alongside 48 others — read 26 August 2026
CARDINAL - PUBG
@cardinal_youtube · 119,858
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 18 here — alongside 17 others — read 14 August 2026
KINOCHi.net (Rasmiy)
@kinochi_net · 27,919
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 10 September 2026
Behzod_teacher
@teacherbekhzod · 62,747
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 2 September 2026
SCORPION KAZINO🦂
@Scorpioncoin · 23,757
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 44 here — alongside 43 others — read 6 September 2026
Yes Uzb | Rasmiy Kanal
@YesUzbRasmiy_1 · 20,183
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 29 September 2026
XORIJDA ISH
@migratsiyaagentligi · 255,211
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 10 August 2026

This channel appears in 107 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Notcoin Uzbekistan 🇺🇿” (@uzb_notcoin_chanel), 14,315 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/uzb_notcoin_chanel.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.