Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Хороший доктор

Channel

Хороший доктор

@SherbatovaHealth

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

16,857subscribers

+1,280 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001509287829
TypeChannel
Username@SherbatovaHealth
DescriptionВсе что вы не знали о своем теле – рассказывают врачи Клиники Юлии Щербатовой www.juliasherbatova.ru Записаться: @sherbatovaclinic Бот: @Julia_Sherbatova_bot https://clck.ru/3NA6j7 https://clck.ru/3GYBtc #YY90S
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 November 2026
Measurements held66
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/SherbatovaHealth

Topic

Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (1 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@pleaseundress/48911 Nov 2026, 14:19 UTC@SherbatovaHealth/804 · this entry11 Nov 2026, 14:20 UTC1.00under a minute
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@pleaseundress5 (5/5 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minute@pleaseundress (4–1)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 1 of the 1 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 40 comparable posts for this entry, running 26 June 2026 to 11 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Recorded under the key clone_copy, last confirmed 12 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

15,57416,88516,229.516,8577 August 202612 November 2026
66 measurements spanning 97 days, net +1,280. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 15,377–17,082 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 66
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Nov 2026, 07:5616,857-28
10 Nov 2026, 09:4816,885+8
9 Nov 2026, 00:1616,877-2
7 Nov 2026, 18:1016,879+8
6 Nov 2026, 20:0716,871+76
5 Nov 2026, 17:0816,795-3
4 Nov 2026, 16:2916,798+2
3 Nov 2026, 12:5616,796-4
2 Nov 2026, 14:3516,800+4
1 Nov 2026, 13:1516,796+2
31 Oct 2026, 12:5716,794-4
30 Oct 2026, 11:1916,798-4
29 Oct 2026, 12:0816,802+3
28 Oct 2026, 14:3716,799-1
27 Oct 2026, 15:1116,800+1
26 Oct 2026, 17:0816,799-3
25 Oct 2026, 17:5916,802-5
24 Oct 2026, 15:4016,807+108
23 Oct 2026, 18:0816,699+27
22 Oct 2026, 19:0716,672first reading

Engagement

40 posts held, back to 26 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 75 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
21.2%
avg views ÷ 16,857 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,570
9 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.44%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
9
of 40 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 November 2026
Posts held40 (26 June 2026 – 11 November 2026)
Views total32,170
Reactions total785
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken13 Nov 2026, 05:31 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
158
Videos
22
Links
509

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

2,369 reactions across 40 posts, in 19 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤1,11647.1%
🔥50821.4%
👍47620.1%
❤‍🔥702.95%
🥰512.15%
💯411.73%
🙏230.971%
👏180.76%
🎉150.633%
😍150.633%
🤝100.422%
✍70.295%
😱60.253%
💔40.169%
🥴30.127%
💩20.084%
🤨20.084%
👌10.042%
😁10.042%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 40 of the 40 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,369 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 40 most recent posts we hold, published 26 June 2026 to 11 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 3 of 9 posts held from the last 30 days (33.3%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

11 Nov 2026, 14:20 UTC≈1,190 views40 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Forwarded from @pleaseundress

«А мы ребенка не заденем?» И другие вопросы про секс во время беременности:) Рассказывает акушер-гинеколог Лятифова Фидан Эйнуллаевна: Беременные чаще всего боятся двух вещей: что секс как-то навредит ребенку и что он спровоцирует выкидыш или преждевременные роды. Иногда даже решают вообще отказаться от близости до родов. Этого делать не нужно. На самом деле, если беременность протекает нормально и врач не видит ос…

❤25👍13🔥1🥰1

9 Nov 2026, 10:26 UTC≈1,690 views82 reactionsread 13 November 2026

Не ловкость рук, а мастерство Рассказывает хирург-онколог, маммолог, УЗИ-диагност Никифорова Ольга Николаевна: Базалиома, она же базальноклеточный рак, — это самый частый и при этом самый смирный рак кожи. Она растет медленно, практически никогда не дает метастазов, не уходит в хрящи и кости. В большинстве случаев ее достаточно просто грамотно удалить — и на этом лечение заканчивается, никакой химии не нужно. У ме…

❤68👍14

6 Nov 2026, 10:20 UTC≈2,750 views37 reactionsread 13 November 2026

От гриппа, пневмококка и не только: какие прививки можно сделать на Большой Никитской Все так, теперь пройти вакцинацию можно у нас в клинике. Что есть: От гриппа: Четырёхвалентная вакцина, защищающая от четырёх штаммов вируса гриппа. Она не содержит живого вируса, поэтому заразиться гриппом от прививки невозможно. Стоимость — 2 500 ₽. От гепатита B: Гепатит B передаётся через кровь и при половых контактах. Зарази…

❤28🔥9

30 Oct 2026, 07:54 UTC≈3,590 views136 reactionsread 13 November 2026

«Мне тут кое-что не нравится»: что врач видит на УЗИ, кроме вен Рассказывает флеболог, хирург, лимфолог Дубровская Ольга Сергеевна: У датчика УЗИ широкий захват. Физически невозможно смотреть в ногу и видеть только вену — на экране проходит все: артерии, лимфоузлы, подкожно-жировая клетчатка, мышцы, суставы. Из частых “находок”: киста Бейкера в подколенной ямке, синовиты, бурситы коленного сустава. Пациенту, конечн…

❤69👍49🥰7😱6🔥4😁1

27 Oct 2026, 06:21 UTC≈3,750 views52 reactionsread 13 November 2026

Эластография печени: увидеть то, чего не показывает обычное УЗИ Рассказывает хирург-онколог, маммолог, УЗИ-диагност Никифорова Ольга Николаевна: Обычное УЗИ покажет, что печень «диффузно изменена», — и на этом все. А эластометрия позволяет оценить, насколько орган пропитан жиром и насколько изменилась его структура — вплоть до стадии цирроза. То есть охарактеризовать печень настолько подробно, насколько это вообще …

🔥27❤18✍7

26 Oct 2026, 12:20 UTC≈3,350 views33 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Forwarded from @pleaseundress

Розовый октябрь немного застрял в розовом Каждый октябрь интернет становится розовым. Ленточки, открытки, розовые баннеры, розовые товары. В какой-то момент за всем этим цветом становится трудно разглядеть, о чём вообще был разговор. А разговор — о конкретных женщинах, медицинских решениях и доступности качественной диагностики. ❕Рак груди все еще самый частый рак у женщин. Но чем раньше его находят, тем легче леч…

🔥19❤14

21 Oct 2026, 08:15 UTC≈4,040 views212 reactionsread 13 November 2026

Почему сидячая работа портит ноги — и чем делу помочь? Рассказывает флеболог, хирург, лимфолог Дубровская Ольга Сергеевна: Проблем с венами сейчас несколько больше, чем раньше. По двум причинам. Первая: стало заметно больше обследованных. Вторая, и она куда важнее: мы стали сидеть. А человек — существо ходячее, а не сидячее. Нас усадила жизнь, и организм к этому не приспособлен. Отсюда более быстрое прогрессирован…

🔥79👍60❤55🥰14👏4

19 Oct 2026, 09:37 UTC≈3,870 views80 reactionsread 13 November 2026

Эластография: как УЗИ научилось щупать образование Рассказывает хирург-онколог, маммолог, УЗИ-диагност Никифорова Ольга Николаевна: Представьте, что вы можете потрогать образование прямо через экран и понять, какое оно на ощупь: мягкое, упругое или твердое, как камень. Примерно это и делает эластография — метод, который оценивает жесткость тканей. А жесткость для нас очень важна: доброкачественные образования обычн…

🔥35❤30👏11👍2🥰2

15 Oct 2026, 09:27 UTC≈7,940 views113 reactionsread 13 November 2026

Зачем женщине в перименопаузе кардиолог Рассказывает акушер-гинеколог Лятифова Фидан Эйнуллаевна: Пациентки иногда удивляются: пришла к гинекологу за гормонами, а меня отправляют к кардиологу. Но я всегда на этом настаиваю, и вот почему. Пока цикл регулярный и эстрогенов достаточно, сосуды находятся под их защитой. Поэтому в репродуктивном возрасте женщины реже мужчин сталкиваются с сердечно-сосудистыми болезнями…

👍46❤41🔥12❤‍🔥11🥰3

13 Oct 2026, 13:50 UTC≈4,250 views68 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Forwarded from @JuliaSherbatovaPhoto

Давно нас не было, но мы тут: всё самое важное с мая по сентябрь Последний дайджест был про апрель — а потом случилось лето. Посты выходили, а до итогов руки не доходили. Исправляемся: за это время врачи успели поучиться, съездить на конгрессы и даже кое-что попробовать на себе:) ⭐️ Сезон конгрессов Юлиана Игоревна Гайнутдинова побывала на IX Балтийском конгрессе по эстетической медицине. Отдельный блок там был пр…

❤27🔥22😍15👏2👌1🥰1

12 Oct 2026, 12:17 UTC≈3,420 views80 reactionsread 13 November 2026

Ноги ноют по ночам: это вообще к флебологу? Рассказывает флеболог, хирург, лимфолог Дубровская Ольга Сергеевна: Ситуация: отеков нет, сосудистых сеточек нет, ничего не выпирает — а ноги к ночи начинают ныть и мешают заснуть. Скорее всего, это не мой пациент. Ночные боли, которые не дают уснуть, — это чаще про неврологию. Вот как это различается по ощущениям. Венозная тяжесть — как будто к ноге привязали гирю. Ног…

❤45👍30🥰5

9 Oct 2026, 10:32 UTC≈3,640 views45 reactionsread 13 November 2026

«Я не переношу статины». А что это вообще значит? Рассказывает врач-кардиолог Провоторова Юлия Дмитриевна: Есть два варианта. Полная непереносимость — это довольно редкая ситуация (1-2%), когда человек действительно не может принимать статины вообще. Мы пробовали разные препараты, меняли дозировки, режим приёма, смотрели анализы, исключали другие причины симптомов — и всё равно пациент плохо переносит терапию. То…

❤29🔥13🥰3

Showing the 12 most recent of 40 posts we hold for @SherbatovaHealth. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 12 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Доктор Жимба
@JutShiClinic · 49,828
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 26 August 2026
Доктор Щербатова
@JuliaSherbatova · 39,410
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 31 August 2026
Запишите меня
@doctor_lekomtseva · 30,380
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 8 September 2026
Доктор Афинская
@liza_afinskaia · 71,850
Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 20 August 2026

This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Хороший доктор” (@SherbatovaHealth), 16,857 subscribers as measured 12 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/SherbatovaHealth.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.