خانواده بزرگ شهرداری
آی دی جهت ارسال مطالب👇🏾
🆔 @shahrdarc 👈
كانال رسمي پايگاه تحليلي و خبري بهارستان ایران
دارای مجوز رسمی از وزارت ارشاد 77161
صفحه اینستاگرام👇
Instagram.com/shahrdarchi
بله 👈👈 ble.ir/join/AnSKXseSXm
Created
31 August 2017 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset)
Local community — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 84% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Views per post sit far above this size band
42,300 average views per post against 42,117 subscribers — an engagement rate of 100.5%. Across the 3,436 registered channels in the same cohort — 31,628–99,894 subscribers, posting mainly in Persian — the middle half sit between 2.06% and 11.1%, with a median of 5.13%.
What this was computed from
Window
30 days (30 August 2026 – 29 September 2026)
Posts measured
49 of 49 published in the window (0 exact, 49 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled
2,074,000
Mature posts only
101.1% over 48 posts read at least 24h after publication
When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.
This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.
Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 29 September 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Growth
37 measurements spanning 51 days, net +392. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 39,002–42,889 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 37
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
25 Sept 2026, 21:42
42,117
+10
19 Sept 2026, 08:40
42,107
-19
16 Sept 2026, 20:57
42,126
-21
15 Sept 2026, 02:00
42,147
-37
13 Sept 2026, 11:21
42,184
-67
11 Sept 2026, 17:19
42,251
-12
9 Sept 2026, 05:38
42,263
+29
6 Sept 2026, 00:58
42,234
-24
4 Sept 2026, 00:14
42,258
-16
2 Sept 2026, 11:23
42,274
-24
1 Sept 2026, 13:02
42,298
-37
31 Aug 2026, 13:37
42,335
-22
30 Aug 2026, 12:14
42,357
-34
29 Aug 2026, 10:57
42,391
-37
28 Aug 2026, 07:44
42,428
-6
27 Aug 2026, 07:26
42,434
-6
26 Aug 2026, 09:32
42,440
+269
25 Aug 2026, 06:02
42,171
+2,721
24 Aug 2026, 05:25
39,450
-1,696
22 Aug 2026, 14:53
41,146
first reading
Engagement
129 posts held, back to 29 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 101 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
100.5%
avg views ÷ 42,117 subscribers
Avg views / post
42,300
49 posts measured
Reaction rate
—
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
49
of 129 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 September 2026
Posts held
129 (29 July 2026 – 28 September 2026)
Views total
2,074,000
Reactions total
—
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
29 Sept 2026, 02:43 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈3,300
Videos
≈652
Links
≈8,890
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 29 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
9m 08s
Average length
2m 17s
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
78,919 reactions across 38 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👎
36,217
45.9%
👍
30,775
39.0%
😡
6,519
8.26%
👏
4,869
6.17%
😱
456
0.578%
😢
83
0.105%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 43 of the 129 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 82,120 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 129 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 28 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
برنامهریزی برای اهدای سبد پروتئینی در آبانماه
بر اساس اطلاعیه معاونت توسعه سرمایه انسانی شهرداری تهران در صورت فراهمشدن شرایط، «سبد پروتئینی» در آبانماه جایگزین واریزی ۶/۵ میلیون تومانی ماهانه میشود.
با توجه به پراکندگی محل سکونت همکاران، اجرای این طرح دشواریهای خاص خود را خواهد داشت؛ با اینحال، برای سهولت بیشتر و با هدف تکریم و آسایش همکاران، تدابیری اندیشیده شده است تا این اقلام با رعایت استانداردهای نگ…
چند #پیام_پرسنل
۱. جانشینپروری؛ پس تجربه و تخصص چه میشود؟
بارها موضوع انتقال تجربه و آموزش نیروها و «جانشینپروری» در شهرداری مطرح شده؛ از نامهها و بخشنامهها تا ضبط فیلم و مستندسازی تجربیات کارکنان.
🔻اما یکی از همکاران میپرسد: در حالی که بر تجربه و آموزش تأکید میشود، چرا در برخی موارد افرادی بهعنوان رئیس اداره منصوب میشوند که به گفته کارکنان، تجربه کافی در آن حوزه ندارند؟
❓این انتصابات بر چه مبنایی انجام …
❓ دیدار با کارکنان؛ شنیدن مشکلات یا ثبت یک گزارش؟
«ما که عکسهامون رو گرفتیم و تکلیفمون رو هم ادا کردیم…»
این جمله از فیلم اخراجیها شاید حالوهوای برخی دیدارهای اخیر مدیرکل منابع انسانی با کارکنان مناطق و سازمانها را به ذهن بیاورد؛ اما موضوع اصلی یک سؤال است:
اگر قرار است مدیرکل منابع انسانی برای شنیدن مشکلات کارکنان به مجموعهای مراجعه کند، آیا حضور مدیران همان مجموعه در کنار ایشان، امکان طرح آزادانه مشکلات را ب…
❓ساعت کاری کارکنان شهرداری تهران؛ بالاخره چه تصمیمی گرفته میشود؟
موضوع ساعت کاری کارکنان شهرداری تهران، پیش از این نیز در «شهردارچی» مطرح شده بود؛ اما همچنان برای بسیاری از کارکنان این سؤال وجود دارد که آیا قرار نیست ساعت کاری شهرداری تهران کاهش پیدا کند؟
کارکنان شهرداری طی سالهای اخیر، علاوه بر فشار کاری، با افزایش قابلتوجه هزینههای زندگی و فشارهای معیشتی نیز مواجه بودهاند. در چنین شرایطی، هر اقدامی که بتواند…
#پیام_پرسنل
با سلام و احترام
ابتدا از مجموعه محترم «شهردارچی» بابت انعکاس و پیگیری دغدغهها و مطالبات کارکنان شهرداری صمیمانه تشکر و قدردانی میکنم. خواهشمندم در صورت صلاحدید، این موضوع را نیز در کانال منتشر و پیگیری فرمایید.
بنده در اسفندماه نسبت به خرید توکن پروژه مسکن «نرگس» وابسته به قرارگاه مسکن شهرداری تهران، واقع در یافتآباد، اقدام کرده و وجه نقد مربوطه را نیز بهطور کامل پرداخت کردهام. با توجه به اینکه ا…
❓احکام کارکنان رسمی شهرداری تهران در آستانه اصلاح؟
❇️یک خبر مهم برای کارکنان رسمی شهرداری تهران
پس از ماهها پیگیری درباره نحوه محاسبه حقوق کارکنان رسمی شهرداری تهران، حالا موضوع اصلاح احکام کارگزینی و محاسبه مطالبات از ابتدای سال ۱۴۰۵ وارد مرحله جدیتری شده است.
بر اساس مستندات رسمی، سازمان اداری و استخدامی کشور در نامه شماره ۳۱۹۳۷ مورخ ۱۴۰۵/۰۵/۱۱، در پاسخ به مکاتبه سازمان شهرداریها و دهیاریهای کشور، درباره نحو…
#مطالبات_کارکنان | سه مطالبه؛ یک سؤال مشترک: تکلیف چیست؟
🔻در روزهای اخیر، سه مطالبه از سوی همکاران شهرداری به دست «شهردارچی» رسیده که محور مشترک هر سه، بلاتکلیفی و نبود پاسخ روشن است:
۱. تعاونی مسکن یگان حفاظت؛ تکلیف حدود ۵۰۰ نفر چیست؟
جمعی از نگهبانان یگان حفاظت اعلام کردهاند در سال ۱۴۰۲، هر نفر حدود ۴۰۰ تا ۶۰۰ میلیون تومان برای طرح خرید زمین به حساب تعاونی واریز کردهاند؛ اما پس از گذشت بیش از سه سال، هنوز وضعی…
❓کلانشهرها احکام را اصلاح میکنند؛ تهران چه زمانی؟
موضوع اصلاح احکام و بهبود دریافتی کارکنان شهرداریها، همچنان یکی از مطالبات جدی بدنه شهرداری تهران است.
در شهرهای دیگر نیز اقداماتی برای بهبود وضعیت پرداخت و ساماندهی نیروی انسانی در حال انجام است؛ اما در تهران، با وجود پیگیریهای متعدد، هنوز بخش مهمی از مطالبات کارکنان در انتظار تعیین تکلیف است.
این موضوع البته تنها مطالبه کارکنان نیست.
در این میان برخی اعضای شو…
#پیام_پرسنل
ما جمعی از رانندگان شرکت خودرو سرویس شهر هستیم که در مناطق مختلف شهرداری تهران مشغول به کار هستیم.
طبق صحبتها و وعدههای مطرحشده، قرار بود پس از انعقاد قرارداد، بن رفاهی به مبلغ حدود ۶ میلیون و ۵۰۰ هزار تومان برای رانندگان نیز در نظر گرفته و پرداخت شود، اما متأسفانه تاکنون خبری از پرداخت این مبلغ به رانندگان نشده است.
از طرف دیگر، با افزایش قیمت بنزین، هزینههای خودرو و استهلاک و مخارج روزمره رانندگان …
📣ساعت کاری جدید ادارات از اول مهر تا آخر سال اعلام شد: فعالیت از ۸ تا ۱۳
رئیس سازمان اداری و استخدامی کشور با صدور بخشنامهای، ساعات کاری دستگاههای اجرایی را از اول مهرماه تا پایان سال جاری، از ساعت ۸ تا ۱۳ تعیین کرد.
این بخشنامه با استناد به مصوبه ۲۰ اردیبهشت امسال هیات وزیران و با هدف مدیریت بهینه مصرف انرژی، حفظ پایداری شبکه سراسری برق و گاز کشور و تداوم خدمترسانی بدون وقفه به مردم ابلاغ شده است.
@shahrdarchi …
🔴 رفاه کارکنان؛ فراموششده در میان اولویتها؟
رستورانهای مجموعه الماس شهر، بوستان گفتگو و ... برای بسیاری از کارکنان شهرداری تهران، صرفاً یک رستوران نبود؛ یکی از معدود امکاناتی بود که به خانوادهها اجازه میداد با هزینهای قابلتحمل، گاهی یک وعده غذای بیرون را تجربه کنند.
اما مدتهاست این مجموعهها با عنوان «تعمیرات» یا عناوین مشابه تعطیلاند؛ بدون اینکه توضیح روشنی درباره علت تعطیلی، وضعیت فعلی یا زمان بازگشایی ب…
⚡️ تهران؛ از مصرفکننده انرژی تا مدیر انرژی؟
واگذاری مدیریت انرژی تهران به شهرداری را نباید فقط یک «مأموریت جدید» دید؛ اگر درست طراحی شود، میتواند آغاز یک تغییر جدی در مدل مدیریت پایتخت باشد.
شهرداری تهران در بحرانهای اخیر، از جمله جنگ ۱۲ روزه، نشان داد که مدیریت شهری فقط متولی آسفالت و نظافت شهر نیست؛ در شرایط بحرانی، میتواند در امدادرسانی، اسکان، بازسازی، حملونقل و استمرار خدمات عمومی در کنار دولت قرار بگیرد …
Showing the 12 most recent of 129 posts we hold for @Shahrdarchi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 6 most recent of 10 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
سؤال ۸- در صورت قرار گرفتن شما در فهرست کارکنان مشمول جابهجایی، کدام موارد را برای رعایت حقوق کارکنان ضروری میدانید؟
امکان انتخاب چند گزینه وجود دارد.
⚪️ اعلام کتبی دلیل جابهجایی24%
⚪️ اعلام پست و محل خدمت مقصد32%
⚪️ تناسب پست مقصد با تخصص و سابقه فرد37%
⚪️ توجه به محل سکونت76%
⚪️ توجه به شرایط خانوادگی25%
⚪️ امکان اعتراض و بررسی مجدد25%
⚪️ اولویت دادن به جابهجایی داوطلبانه40%
⚪️پیشبینی مهلت کافی برای اجرای انتقال8%
⚪️ سایر موارد ( در کامنت بنویسید)2%
The shares total 269%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
سؤال ۵ ـ به نظر شما جابهجایی اجباری کارکنان بدون اعلام عمومی معیارها و دلایل انتخاب افراد، تا چه اندازه میتواند موجب بیاعتمادی کارکنان شود؟
🟣 بسیار زیاد41%
🟣 زیاد4%
🟣 متوسط2%
🟣 کم1%
🟣 اصلاً موجب بیاعتمادی نمیشود51%
🟣 نظری ندارم2%
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 129 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 28 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 29 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
خانه کارگر @khanehkargar · 55,400 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 23 August 2026
خبرگزاری شهر @Shahragency · 28,904 Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 13 September 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“شهردارچي” (@Shahrdarchi), 42,117 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Shahrdarchi.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.