Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

شهردارچي

@Shahrdarchi

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

41,405subscribers

-320 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001125713112
TypeChannel
Username@Shahrdarchi
Created31 August 2017measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held11
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Shahrdarchi

Topic

Local community — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 84% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Views per post sit far above this size band

32,000 average views per post against 41,483 subscribers — an engagement rate of 77.3%. Across the 3,067 registered channels in the same cohort — 31,627–99,869 subscribers, posting mainly in Persian — the middle half sit between 2.41% and 12.2%, with a median of 5.96%.

What this was computed from
Window30 days (13 July 2026 12 August 2026)
Posts measured35 of 38 published in the window (0 exact, 35 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled1,121,700
Mature posts only77.9% over 34 posts read at least 24h after publication
Subscribers41,483 measured 11 August 2026
Cohortb31623:fas · 3,067 channels · p10 1.01% · p25 2.41% · p50 5.96% · p75 12.2% · p90 22.9%
Position in cohort99.282th percentile · 13.0× the cohort median
Uncertainty±0.071% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding
Post languagePersian · 100.0%of the window’s posts

When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.

This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal.A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.

Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 12 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

41,40541,72541,5656 August 2026 — 41,725 subscribers6 August 2026 — 41,725 subscribers6 August 2026 — 41,719 subscribers7 August 2026 — 41,705 subscribers8 August 2026 — 41,642 subscribers9 August 2026 — 41,600 subscribers10 August 2026 — 41,557 subscribers11 August 2026 — 41,528 subscribers11 August 2026 — 41,483 subscribers13 August 2026 — 41,441 subscribers14 August 2026 — 41,405 subscribers6 August 202614 August 2026
11 measurements spanning 8 days, net -320. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 41,357–41,773 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 14:2641,405-36
13 Aug 2026, 03:1541,441-42
11 Aug 2026, 23:4241,483-45
11 Aug 2026, 01:4741,528-29
10 Aug 2026, 03:5341,557-43
9 Aug 2026, 06:4141,600-42
8 Aug 2026, 06:2841,642-63
7 Aug 2026, 04:5341,705-14
6 Aug 2026, 07:4141,719-6
6 Aug 2026, 02:3041,725no change
6 Aug 2026, 02:2841,725first reading

Engagement

38 posts held, back to 29 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 20 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
78.6%
avg views ÷ 41,405 subscribers
Avg views / post
32,600
35 posts measured
Reaction rate
6.90%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
38
of 38 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held38 (29 July 202612 August 2026)
Views total1,139,500
Reactions total78,679
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken14 Aug 2026, 12:48 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
2m 03s
Average length
2m 03s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

75,478 reactions across 30 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 48.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👎36,20548.0%
👍27,44336.4%
😡6,5138.63%
👏4,8016.36%
😱4550.603%
😢610.081%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 35 of the 38 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 78,679reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 38 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

12 Aug 2026, 13:07 UTC≈30,800 views1,339 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

👁️‍🗨️ وعده‌سنج شهردارچی | قسمت دوم دو وعده مهم؛ یک سؤال مشترک: سرانجام چه شد؟ 1️⃣ یک گروه تشویقی برای کارکنان اعطای یک گروه تشویقی به کارکنان شهرداری تهران، وعده تازه‌ای نیست. این موضوع از سال ۱۴۰۱ در اظهارات مدیران شهری و اعضای شورای شهر مطرح شد و حتی موضوع اخذ مجوزهای لازم نیز مورد پیگیری قرار گرفت. اما با گذشت چند سال، همچنان این سؤال پابرجاست: چرا وعده یک گروه تشویقی برای ترمیم حقوق کارکنان به فراموشی سپرده

👍1,290👏38😢7👎2😡2

11 Aug 2026, 18:15 UTC≈30,200 views1,280 reactionsread 14 August 2026

وعده ۵۰۰ میلیونی به کارکنان شهرداری تهران روی کاغذ ماند؟ امانی: وعده‌های بدون پشتوانه، شکاف میان کارکنان و مدیران را عمیق‌تر می‌کند 🔻ناصر امانی، عضو شورای شهر تهران، در گفت‌وگو با شهرداچی، با انتقاد از وعده‌های اجرا نشده مدیریت شهری به کارکنان، درباره سرنوشت طرح اعطای کارت اعتباری با تسهیلات ۵۰۰میلیون تومانی و کارمزد چهار درصد گفت: این وعده از سوی مدیریت شهری مطرح شده و شورای شهر در اعلام آن نقشی نداشته است. 🔻وی اف

👍1,240👏26😡7😢6👎1

11 Aug 2026, 17:03 UTC≈31,700 views372 reactionsread 14 August 2026

#پیام_پرسنل دلنوشته سلام خدمت همه همکاران عزیز مجموعه شهرداری تهران به خصوص مجموعه معاونت خدمات شهری و محیط زیست وظیفه خودم میدونم در ابتدا یه تشکر ویژه کنم از همه مدیران و کارمندان و کارگران مجموعه معاونت خدمات شهری و محیط زیست که می توان نام این مجموعه را مادر شهرداری تهران نامید. مجموعه خدمات شهری و محیط زیست مثل یک مادر که مدیریت خونه با اوست یک شهر را مدیریت می کنه و با حجم بالای کار برای نظم و نظافت، زیبایی

👍339👏31👎2

11 Aug 2026, 17:01 UTC≈27,300 views590 reactionsread 14 August 2026

#پیام_پرسنل با سلام گلایه ما از مدیریت شهری تهران، به‌ویژه معاونت محترم منابع انسانی به مدیریت آقای دکتر باقری، این است که چرا در حق کارکنانی که برای ارتقای سطح علمی و تخصصی خود تلاش کرده‌اند، چنین بی‌عدالتی صورت می‌گیرد؟ ما بدون اینکه حتی لحظه‌ای در انجام وظایف سازمانی و خدمت‌رسانی به شهروندان خللی ایجاد شود، با صرف وقت، هزینه و تلاش ادامه تحصیل داده‌ایم تا دانش و تخصص خود را در راستای نیازهای شغلی افزایش دهیم. اکن

👍568👎18😢4

11 Aug 2026, 10:26 UTC≈35,100 views611 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

📣جزئیات بهره‌مندی از غذای حضرتی حرم حضرت عبدالعظیم (ع) Instagram.com/shahrdarchi @shahrdarchi 👈 Instagram.com/shahrvandchy @shahrvandchy 👈 ble.ir/join/AnSKXseSXm 👈

👎594😢6😡5👍4👏1😱1

11 Aug 2026, 03:35 UTC≈34,500 views627 reactionsread 14 August 2026

📣 هیچ تغییری در راه نیست، شهرداران مناطق با قدرت به کار خود ادامه خواهند داد 🔹لطف الله فروزنده معاون هماهنگی و امور مناطق با تاکید بر ادامه حضور شهرداران مناطق شایعات اخیر را بی اساس دانست. 🔻ق لطف الله فروزنده معاون هماهنگی و امور مناطق با اعلام این خبر گفت: با توجه به روند نظارت دوره ای در مناطق که به صورت میدانی و مستمر در حال انجام می باشد و عملکرد مناسب مدیران طی ارزیابی های مداوم و کارشناسی معاونت، دلیلی برای

👎604😢8👍7😡7😱1

10 Aug 2026, 14:31 UTC≈32,100 views1,089 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

🔻سازمان اداری و استخدامی کشور؛ اعلام مبنای محاسبه حداقل حقوق سال ۱۴۰۵ کارکنان مشمول قانون نظام هماهنگ پرداخت ▪️حداقل حقوق سال ۱۴۰۵ کارکنان مشمول قانون نظام هماهنگ پرداخت کارکنان دولت، بر اساس تعریف مذکور در مصوبه شماره ۸۰۴۸۸ مورخ ۲۴/۰۷/۱۴۰۲ شورای توسعه مدیریت و سرمایه انسانی محاسبه می‌شود؛ یعنی: حقوق = افزایش سنواتی + حقوق مبنا. ▪️به‌عبارتی، مجموع حقوق مبنا و افزایش سنواتی در سال ۱۴۰۵ نباید از ۲۷،۷۰۷،۴۴۳ ریال کمتر ب

👍1,080😱7👎2

9 Aug 2026, 09:12 UTC≈33,100 views5,394 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Video

🎥وقتی روابط عمومی دیوار می‌شود! مشاهده ویدئو در اینستاگرام شهردارچی Instagram.com/shahrdarchi @shahrdarchi 👈

👎4,240👍800👏354

9 Aug 2026, 04:02 UTC≈30,000 views1,350 reactionsread 14 August 2026

❓نظرسنجی‌های اجباری؛ صدای کارکنان شهرداری تهران شنیده می‌شود؟ 🔘سال‌هاست مرکز نوسازی و تحول اداری شهرداری تهران، کارکنان را به شرکت در نظرسنجی‌های مختلف ملزم می‌کند؛ پرسشنامه‌هایی که در میز کار کارکنان بارگذاری می‌شود و پاسخگویی به آنها اجباری است. اما پرسش اساسی اینجاست: نتیجه این نظرسنجی‌ها کجاست و چه تغییری برای کارکنان ایجاد کرده است؟ 🔘در آخرین نظرسنجی، ۳۰ پرسش درباره مهم‌ترین مسائل سازمانی مطرح شده؛ از اعتماد ب

👍977👏372😢1

8 Aug 2026, 17:55 UTC≈36,100 views1,893 reactionsread 14 August 2026

#پیام_پرسنل وقتی «رفاه کارکنان» از خدمات درمانی حذف می‌شود، چه کسی پاسخگوست؟ امروز برای دریافت خدمات درمانی به کلینیک شهرداری منطقه ۵ مراجعه کردم و با تعجب اعلام شد که خدمات ایمپلنت در تمام مراکز درمانی شهرداری تهران متوقف شده است. Instagram.com/shahrdarchi واقعاً سؤال اینجاست: این تصمیم با چه توجیهی گرفته شده و چه کسی پاسخگوی حذف یکی از مهم‌ترین خدمات دندانپزشکی کارکنان شهرداری است؟ کارکنانی که هر روز در شرایط سخت

👍1,290😱372😡225😢6

7 Aug 2026, 14:15 UTC≈33,300 views2,138 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

👁️‍🗨️ وعده‌سنج شهردارچی | قسمت اول وعده‌هایی که هنوز چشم‌انتظار اجرا هستند… در مدیریت، وعده یک جمله نیست؛ تعهدی است که با گذشت زمان سنجیده می‌شود. ⏳ وام ۵۰۰ میلیون تومانی با نرخ ۴ درصد شهردار تهران در همایش فصلی مدیران اعلام کرد که وام ۵۰۰ میلیون تومانی با نرخ ۴ درصد برای کلیه کارکنان شهرداری تهران در نظر گرفته شده است. وضعیت امروز: هنوز اجرای عمومی این وعده برای کارکنان آغاز نشده ⏳ اعتبار خرید ماهانه ۱۰ میلیون

👍1,480👏649😡8👎1

7 Aug 2026, 12:49 UTC≈29,400 views409 reactionsread 14 August 2026

#پیام_شهروند 1️⃣ بنده یکی از ساکنان محدوده طرح ترافیک هستم هر سال برای استفاده از تخفیف طرح معاینه فنی برتر به مراکز معاینه فنی مراجعه می نمایم و با پرداخت مبلغ بیشتری نسبت به معاینه فنی عادی، معاینه فنی برتر دریافت می نمایم تا از تخفیف ۲۰ درصدی در هنگام محاسبه مبلغ ورود به طرح استفاده نمایم. شهرداری تهران امسال فقط مبلغ معاینه فنی برتر که مبلغ بیشتری نسبت به معاینه عادی است را دریافت می نماید اما زمانیکه به سامانه

👍243👏159👎7

Showing the 12 most recent of 38 posts we hold for @Shahrdarchi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 30,628 of 1,336,469entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“شهردارچي” (@Shahrdarchi), 41,405 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Shahrdarchi.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.