4 measurements spanning 8 days, net +7. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 987–996 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
13 Aug 2026, 22:28
995
+6
6 Aug 2026, 13:19
989
no change
6 Aug 2026, 12:11
989
+1
5 Aug 2026, 22:23
988
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 6 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
102.7%
avg views ÷ 995 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,020
8 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.09%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
8
of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026
Posts held
20 (6 July 2026 – 5 August 2026)
Views total
8,174
Reactions total
89
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
6 Aug 2026, 13:19 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
274 reactions across 20 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 58.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
159
58.0%
👍
42
15.3%
🔥
32
11.7%
😢
31
11.3%
👎
9
3.28%
😡
1
0.365%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 274reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 6 July 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
☀️ در نوشتن این سطور، خدا را شاهد میگیرم که ذرهای غلو در آن نمیکنم. آنچه مینویسم، به دقت از مشاهده رخدادهای این دوران است.
ما رهبرمان را دوست داریم؛ فکر هم میکنیم او را در طول زمان شناختهایم.
اما در همین حدود ۱۶۰ روز گذشته، حتی اگر بخواهیم تنها اقدامات آشکار و رسانهای ایشان را ملاک قرار دهیم و از آنچه از چشم رسانهها پنهان مانده سخنی نگوییم، باز هم به چشم چیزهایی دیدهایم که برای انسان "لیطمئن قلبی" میسازد.
…
🎙 جنگ راهبردها
+ ابتکار عمل رهبر انقلاب در این روزها را ببینیم.
+ حجاب معاصرت چه چیزی را نمیگذارد ببینیم؟!
+ ۳ اقدام امریکاییها چیست؟
+ اقدام ایرانیها چیست؟
❤️ بعـثت خــون
قیام مردم میدان، دفاع همگانی از ایران
📆 ۵شنبه ۱ مرداد ماه ۱۴۰۵
🔺 هیأت آیین حسینی
📍 تهران، میدان ونک
+ @komeik
📩 روابط عمومی دفتر رهبر انقلاب اسلامی در اطلاعیهای تاکید کرد؛
⚠️ مرجع رسمی انتشار پیامها، اخبار و مطالب مرتبط با آیتالله سیدمجتبی حسینی خامنهای، دفتر ایشان و دفتر حفظ و نشر آثار رهبر انقلاب است و هرگونه مطالبی خارج از این چارچوب فاقد سندیت و صحت میباشد
📖 متن اطلاعیه روابط عمومی دفتر رهبر انقلاب اسلامی به این شرح است:
✏️ بسم الله الرحمن الرحیم
▪️ با گرامیداشت اربعین حسینی و ادای احترام به روح بلند رهبر شهید انق…
☀️ اسلام ناب، اسلام سیاسی است.
همو که این چنین قلبها را به یکدیگر دور حسین(ع) پیوند داده است.
این روزها، همزمان با پیادهروی اربعین
تشییع قهرمانان حشد بود که توسط سنتکام امریکا و سعودی به شهادت رسیده بودند.
شهدایی که برای ایجاد نظم جدید منطقه جانشان را فدا کردند.
ما نسلی هستیم که پیشروی راهبرد "راه قدس از کربلا میگذرد" امام خمینی(ره) را با چشمهایمان میبینیم.
وگرنه چه کسی در دهه شصت زیر آن هجوم همهجانبه غرب و صد…
اینکه رهبر عزیز انقلاب در ۲۱ اسفند۱۴۰۴ فرموده بودند «در مورد گشودن جبهههای دیگری که دشمن در آن تجربه ناچیزی دارد و بهشدت در آن آسیبپذیر خواهد بود، مطالعاتی صورت گرفته است و فعالسازی آن در صورت استمرار وضع جنگی و بنا بر رعایت مصالح صورت خواهد گرفت.»
لابد اینجا حکمتش روشن میشود.
🔻هرمز، بابالمندب... و حالا سوئز
🔻برای نخستینبار، دو کشتی آمریکایی در بندر دمیاط مصر هدف اصابت پهپاد قرار گرفتند و دچار آتشسوزی شدند.
🔻تا این لحظه، ایران سکوت است. اما یمن اعلام کرده این عملیات کار ما نبوده، ترامپ نیز گفته این حمله از نظر الگو، شبیه حملات قبلی به نفتکشهاست و سنتکام هم وعده «پاسخ متقابل» داده است.
🔻از سوی دیگر، رسانههایی مانند نیویورکر، واشنگتنتایمز، والاستریت ژورنال و رویترز در تحلیلهای جداگا…
🏴 ماجرای جنگ از کی آغاز شده است؟
آمریکاییهای پروژه جدیدی رو شروع کردند ،
پروژه ای به نام ترور...
و البته ما هم پروژه جدیدی را شروع کردیم ،
و آن خروج آمریکاییها از منطقه است...
📆 ۲۴ تیر ۱۴۰۵
📍 خیابان پیروزی ، چهارراه نبرد
🆔 @mardom_piroozi
+ @kkhojasteh
📝اعتماد به مسئولان صیانت از منافع ایران را تضمین میکند
انتقاد به عملکرد مسئولان نباید موجب ظلم به بیگناهان و شکست وحدت و انسجام اجتماعی شود
⏺️ ملّت عزیز، با تداوم بر اعتماد به مسئولان دلسوز در هر سه قوّه که تلاش ایشان برای رفاه و سعادت ملّت، مشهود میباشد، همچنان برای تضمین صیانت از منافع ایران اسلامی، هوشیار و فعّال در میدان خواهد بود.
▪️ممکن است کسانی با اخلاص تمام و از سر خیرخواهی، انتقاداتی نسبت به عملکرد بعضی…
☀️ جنگ امروز بر سر چیست؟
از اول هم معلوم بود که آمریکاییها به تعهداتشان در دوره توقف آتش وقعی نمینهند. اگرچه که به ایران فرصت داد اقدامات لازم را برای فروش ۸۰ میلیون بشکه نفت، ورود بیش از ۳۰ ابر کشتی کالای اساسی، ورود ارز و تکمیل سلاح و مهمات، انجام دهد.
🔻 از اول هم معلوم بود که آمریکاییها گیر افتادهاند. این پیشبینی در هیچ یک از محاسباتشان نبود که ایران مدیریت تنگه هرمز را در دوره جنگ به دست خواهد گرفت؛ در محا…
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @kkhojasteh. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,126,444 of 1,566,395entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@kkhojasteh named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@komeik named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“كميل خجسته” (@kkhojasteh), 995 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kkhojasteh.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.