놀랍게도 그렇습니다.

Channel
세렌디피티
@SerendipityKR
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
324subscribers
+71 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002830980477 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Usernames | @naruguri @SerendipityKR |
| Description | 투자는 내게 숫자를 맞추는 게임이 아니라, 미래 가치에 대한 진실을 탐구하는 과정. 세상의 노이즈로부터 자유로워지고, 내가 투자해주고 싶은 회사에 과정과 목적이 동의가 된다면 결과와 상관없이 투자해줄 수 있는 그 날까지! 미래 가치를 탐구하고 투자 아이디어를 공유합니다만, 세상의 미래는 누구도 확신할 수 없습니다. 모든 투자 판단과 결과에 대한 책임은 투자자 본인에게 있습니다. |
| Created | Between 1 June 2025 and 30 September 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 13 |
| On Telegram | t.me/SerendipityKR |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 23 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 63% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Nov 2026, 12:22 | 324 | no change |
| 11 Nov 2026, 11:47 | 324 | +31 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 09:15 | 293 | +5 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 21:30 | 288 | +19 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 22:21 | 269 | +7 |
| 6 Oct 2026, 13:58 | 262 | -1 |
| 25 Sept 2026, 17:17 | 263 | -4 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 02:59 | 267 | +2 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 05:17 | 265 | -1 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 04:08 | 266 | +2 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 02:42 | 264 | +11 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 07:42 | 253 | no change |
| 12 Aug 2026, 06:01 | 253 | first reading |
Engagement
37 posts held, back to 12 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 34.3%
- avg views ÷ 324 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 111
- 17 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 1.67%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 17
- of 37 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 3 of 17 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 37 (12 August 2026 – 11 November 2026) |
| Views total | 1,890 |
| Reactions total | 6 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 11 Nov 2026, 12:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈2,550
- Videos
- ≈133
- Links
- ≈6,070
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Reaction mix
7 reactions across 4 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 7 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 37 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 7 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 37 most recent posts we hold, published 12 August 2026 to 11 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 17 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
S&P 500은 1980년 이후 매년 평균 -14.2% 하락한 적이 있습니다. J.P. Morgan의 Guide to the Markets에 따르면, 그럼에도 불구하고 그 46년 중 35년 동안 연말에는 여전히 상승 마감했습니다. 연중 어딘가에서 두 자릿수 하락이 일어나는 것은 정상입니다. 대부분의 경우, 그것이 연간 하락을 의미한 적은 없습니다.
못막을거 같은데.
❤2
공매 잔고있는 어떤 분 난리났네요...ㅋ
이건 미리도 물리고 시작했기 때문에 위로 올려서 살거라 되는 게임.
박진영 대표님 지분이 너무 적어서 어디라도 시작하겠거니 했는데... 여기는 꽤 많은 곳들이 참전하게 될 듯.
JYP도 미리에 좌표 찍혔네요.
❤2
2026.11.11 17:12:09 기업명: JYP Ent.(시가총액: 1조 4,035억) A035900 보고서명: 주식등의대량보유상황보고서(약식) 대표보고 : 미리 캐피탈매니지먼트 엘엘씨/미국 보유목적 : 일반투자 보고전 : -% 보고후 : 6.31% 보고사유 : 일반투자목적으로 장내에서 발행회사 주식 매수 * Miri CapitalManagement LLC 2026-11-03/신규보고(+)/보통주/ 1,758,592주/5% 미만/ 주 1)/ 주2) 2026-11-04/장내매수(+)/보통주/ 75,000주/보고의무 발생/ 주2) 2026-11-05/장내매수(+)/보통주/ 152,896주/주2) 2026-11-06/장내매수(+)/보통주/ 159,100주/주2) 2026-11-09/장내매수(+)/보통주/ 97,000주/추가보고의무발생/ 주…
📌 메모리 가격 다시 상승…주요 제조사, 기업용 반도체 가격 인상 구두 통보·유통가격 매일 상승 글로벌 메모리 시장에서 새로운 가격 인상 움직임이 나타나고 있습니다. 복수의 주요 메모리 제조업체가 유통업체들에 기업용 반도체 가격 인상 계획을 구두로 통보했으며, 공식 인상 공문이 나오기도 전에 유통시장 가격이 상승하고 있습니다. 📈 메모리 가격 상승 가속화 주요 제조사, 기업용 메모리 가격 인상 예고 유통시장 매입가격이 지속 상승하며 견적가격도 매일 상향 지역 유통업체들은 매주 가격을 조정해 하위 유통망에 반영 💾 가격 상승은 기업용에 집중 DRAM 계약시장: 가격 상승세 지속 기업용 SSD: 제조사 및 유통시장 가격 동반 상승 소비자용 NAND: 아직 뚜렷한 상승세 없음 주요 수요처는 AI 컴퓨팅센터 및 데이터센터 🔎 체크포인트 메모…
ETF 투자자들은 단순히 저점 매수에 그치지 않고, 그야말로 싹쓸이했습니다. 지난 5일 동안 하루 평균 약 120억 달러가 유입되었고, 상위 17개 ETF가 모두 주식형이었습니다(이런 현상은 처음 보는 것 같습니다). 뱅가디언 투자자들과 일반 투자자들은 완전히 다른 유형의 투자자이지만, 한 가지 공통점은 있습니다. 바로 저점 매수 전략입니다.
오늘 혼자만 많이 오른게 당연한거라 공유했습니다. 대형주들은 저쯤에서 벨류 합의가 된 것 같고요. 언젠가 좌표 찍히겠죠 뭐.
한국에서 홀리스톤 같은 포지션은 아모텍 밖에 없는데 빠진거에 비하면 강세라 하기도 뭐하고.
Showing the 12 most recent of 37 posts we hold for @SerendipityKR. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
@HANAchina · 35,2731 post퀄리티기업연구소
@QualityInvestingLaboratory · 6,7971 post앱클론 IPR
@abclonipr · 1,6881 postAWAKE - 실시간 주식 공시 정리채널
@darthacking · 65,5711 post우주방산AI로봇 아카이브
@defence_24 · 10,1581 post미국 주식 인사이더 🇺🇸 (US Stocks Insider)
@insidertracking · 74,1201 postCTRINE
@teamctrine · 8,4361 post
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“세렌디피티” (@SerendipityKR), 324 subscribers as measured 11 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/SerendipityKR.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.