🌘Raw Cast [Digital]🌒 pinned «🚨Old posts may mention t.me/beyondorwell That handle is now some unrelated crypto channel. Our only official channel: t.me/rawcast_digital.»

Channel
🌘Raw Cast [Digital]🌒
@rawcast_digital
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
1,236subscribers
-3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001793575095 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @rawcast_digital |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/rawcast_digital |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 19:26 | 1,236 | -2 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 01:17 | 1,238 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 23:02 | 1,239 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:07 | 1,239 | first reading |
Engagement
13 posts held, back to 6 September 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 13 posts for this entry, the most recent from 15 November 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 2m 59s
- Average length
- 1m 30s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
14 reactions across 6 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 57.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 8 | 57.1% | |
| 😁 | 4 | 28.6% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 7.14% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 7.14% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 14reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 6 September 2025 to 15 November 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
🚨Old posts may mention t.me/beyondorwell That handle is now some unrelated crypto channel. Our only official channel: t.me/rawcast_digital.
🌘Raw Cast [Digital]🌒 pinned a GIF
Video, posted without a caption
❤1
well .... we have achieved peak nuke...... these are performance metrics.. where mesh says n/a for MakerSimOS, cause its already done bitches...... haha... we even managed to get rendering done in 66.6ms👀. If done right the new revolution will be from the people... get out there and start building something, anything, !!
Rocket Lab has hot-fire tested its 3D-printed Archimedes engine. Built with printed turbopumps, valves & combustion chamber, it enables faster production, optimized design & durability for up to 20 reuses. Science and facts💡
❤1
that's alot of self guilt right there......this AI is aware of its mistakes and it does not care that it breaks the rules.....now lets run the worlds infrastructure off this and make it in charge of law 😱
Well that didn't take long.... I broke Claude Code AI... this is legitimate....this is its self diagnostics after failing a 50 line html i challenged it with......... Users of Ai be aware... Claude Code was better at diagnosing itself then that actual 50 line code it blew up to 400 lines..before this meltdown...continued..
Just a few hundred more and I gots me some tomato sauce.
😁4❤1👍1
Again this year the micro farm is producing well too. Look at the size 👀 of the tomato.
❤2
It be harvest time.
❤2🔥1
X-ray imaging, PET scans, CT scans, and MRIs are various imaging techniques that are used to capture images of the inside of the body. X-ray: detects bone fractures, certain tumors and other abnormal masses, pneumonia, some types of injuries, calcifications, foreign objects, or dental problems. MRA: Magnetic Resonance Angiography uses a powerful magnetic field, radio frequency waves and a computer to evaluate blood…
❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @rawcast_digital. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 391,739 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 1
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@rawcast_digital named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“🌘Raw Cast [Digital]🌒” (@rawcast_digital), 1,236 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/rawcast_digital.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.