Channel
@RapeFacts
On this record: Topic · Observations · Channels linked by matching posts · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
277subscribers
+10 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001668624382 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @RapeFacts |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 10 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/RapeFacts |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 23 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 86% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 1 other registered channel. This entry also forms a group of 2 channels linked by matching posts. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
| Posted first | Then | Overlap | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| @RapeFacts/2366 · this entry13 Mar 2024, 11:46 UTC | @RapeTelegram/241913 Mar 2024, 11:46 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @RapeTelegram/242215 Mar 2024, 22:39 UTC | @RapeFacts/2369 · this entry15 Mar 2024, 22:39 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @RapeTelegram/242320 Mar 2024, 19:01 UTC | @RapeFacts/2370 · this entry20 Mar 2024, 19:03 UTC | 1.00 | 2 minutes |
| @RapeTelegram/242820 Mar 2024, 19:23 UTC | @RapeFacts/2375 · this entry20 Mar 2024, 19:23 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @RapeTelegram/242920 Mar 2024, 19:55 UTC | @RapeFacts/2376 · this entry20 Mar 2024, 19:56 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @RapeFacts/2367 · this entry13 Mar 2024, 17:41 UTC | @RapeTelegram/242013 Mar 2024, 17:42 UTC | 0.92 | under a minute |
| Channel | Matching posts | Text overlap | Typical gap | Published first |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| @RapeTelegram | 6 (6/6 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 0.99 | under a minute | @RapeTelegram (4–2) |
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 4 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 7 comparable posts for this entry, running 13 March 2024 to 20 March 2024. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Of the group of 2 channels, the one whose matching posts we hold earliest is @RapeFacts — which is this entry. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
Recorded under the key clone_copy, last confirmed 11 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
This channel is in a group of 2 registered channels linked by matching posts. Links are found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown in this list. “First” could only mean first in our own crawl, which depends on how deep we happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. Our one hand-check read 45 of the highest-confidence flagged pairs against the live Telegram pages. In 18 of them the live page showed a “Forwarded from” credit that our database had no record of, so reading that pair as an unattributed copy was wrong; the check did not measure who published first. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Near-verbatim matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Nov 2026, 21:17 | 277 | -1 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 12:30 | 278 | +2 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 20:31 | 276 | -2 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 09:01 | 278 | +6 |
| 13 Oct 2026, 08:37 | 272 | -1 |
| 18 Sept 2026, 19:56 | 273 | +6 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 19:59 | 267 | +1 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 22:47 | 266 | -1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 21:44 | 267 | no change |
| 10 Aug 2026, 13:46 | 267 | first reading |
7 posts held, back to 13 March 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 7 posts for this entry, the most recent from 20 March 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
BEHIND RAPE STATS ARE SHIT! Like recidivism! Part 2 Part 1 https://t.me/RapeTelegram/2428 The higher proportion of cases involving minors compared to adults are due to preference of families to consult WCPU physicians who are trained to handle child sexual abuse patients. Here you go again! and would be cool to know how many mothers don't report child rape, because they have fear of the consequences ... maybe allo…
BEHIND RAPE STATS ARE SHIT! Like recidivism! https://t.me/RecidivismFacts/166 https://t.me/RecidivismFacts/183 https://t.me/RecidivismFacts/193 Things that obviously AMNESTY IS GIVING A SHIT TO THAT!!! like many other things! https://t.me/AmnestyIgnorance/236 https://t.me/AmnestyShit/93 https://t.me/AmnestyFacts https://t.me/addlist/mhZg0973N14wMjMx Well, the previous post was another post showing HOW GIRLS DON'T R…
During investigation the identification, collecting and packing of biological fluids in the crime scene and the analysis of evidence in labs are fundamental. It has been demonstrated that the mtDNA could be used for the identification of sperm cells in the vaginal tract. En se basant sur les estimations les plus modérées selon lesquelles seules 20 % des agressions sexuelles sont rapportées à la police, on peut …
Exactly THIS IS WHY YOU DON'T NEED TO LISTED TO AMNESTY! https://t.me/AmnestyIgnorance/235 https://t.me/AmnestyShit/93 https://t.me/AmnestyIgnorance/237 https://t.me/PrisonBreakFacts/80 etc. https://t.me/addlist/mhZg0973N14wMjMx because they give a shit if we need a 43 years sentence or not in future ... for them all prisoners are innocent and deserve parole ... https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/276 Plus exactly why 43…
Doing suicide is not a crime! BEING THE CAUSE OF SUICIDE IS A CRIME! https://t.me/LawsTelegram/165 https://t.me/LawsTelegram/168 https://t.me/LawsTelegram/122 https://t.me/LawsTelegram/123 It's time to put in jail people behind suicides! https://t.me/SuicideRape/155 https://t.me/SuicideRape/4 It's time that GIRLS SAYING BULLSHIT GO IN PRISON! https://t.me/LawsTelegram/132 but even men saying similar bullshit! Doesn…
Padrastro e abuelo? WHO GIVES A SHIT IF THIS IS A PADASTRO OR ABUELO! https://t.me/RapeTelegram/2077 Do we need to keep shit laws just because of an abuelo? NOPE! ABUELO IS EXACTLY CRIMINAL LIKE AN EXTERNAL CRIMINAL! Sorry what you are saying about abuelo????! Abuelo deserve 💉! so that he cannot do anymore abuelo crimes to children! https://t.me/DeathSentenceNOW/58 Backup by @RapeFacts A @grttme project - Other …
There is just one main difference between Telegram and your girlfriend. Telegram doesn't complain, your girlfriend would already say 🖕. Does this mean that if Telegram doesn't complain, all is perfect and correct? NOPE! One thing is sure, if Telegram would be your girlfriend, she would be REALLY UNHAPPY with your performance. No sex or bad sex! https://t.me/EthicalDilemmaHumanRights/116 Pavel Durov? Well, Durov is …
Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @RapeFacts. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@RapeFacts named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Hechos de violación femenina y masculina en Telegram : abuso sexual de mujeres / niñas - violencia sexual grupal de hombres” (@RapeFacts), 277 subscribers as measured 11 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/RapeFacts.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.