Channel
@AmnestyOneToOne
On this record: Topic · Observations · Channels linked by matching posts · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
90subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002129917819 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @AmnestyOneToOne |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 11 March 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 5 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 5 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/AmnestyOneToOne |
Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 27 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 96% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 1 other registered channel. This entry also forms a group of 2 channels linked by matching posts. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
| Posted first | Then | Overlap | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| @AntoniaBarra/16721 Mar 2024, 15:36 UTC | @AmnestyOneToOne/95 · this entry21 Mar 2024, 15:37 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @AntoniaBarra/16921 Mar 2024, 17:11 UTC | @AmnestyOneToOne/97 · this entry21 Mar 2024, 17:11 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @AntoniaBarra/17021 Mar 2024, 17:30 UTC | @AmnestyOneToOne/98 · this entry21 Mar 2024, 17:30 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @AntoniaBarra/17121 Mar 2024, 17:43 UTC | @AmnestyOneToOne/99 · this entry21 Mar 2024, 17:44 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @AntoniaBarra/17221 Mar 2024, 17:51 UTC | @AmnestyOneToOne/100 · this entry21 Mar 2024, 17:52 UTC | 1.00 | 72 seconds |
| @AntoniaBarra/17321 Mar 2024, 18:51 UTC | @AmnestyOneToOne/101 · this entry21 Mar 2024, 18:51 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| Channel | Matching posts | Text overlap | Typical gap | Published first |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| @AntoniaBarra | 7 (7/7 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | under a minute | @AntoniaBarra (7–0) |
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 7 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 13 comparable posts for this entry, running 11 March 2024 to 3 March 2025. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Of the group of 2 channels, the one whose matching posts we hold earliest is @AntoniaBarra. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
Recorded under the key clone_copy, last confirmed 11 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
This channel is in a group of 2 registered channels linked by matching posts. Links are found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown in this list. “First” could only mean first in our own crawl, which depends on how deep we happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. Our one hand-check read 45 of the highest-confidence flagged pairs against the live Telegram pages. In 18 of them the live page showed a “Forwarded from” credit that our database had no record of, so reading that pair as an unattributed copy was wrong; the check did not measure who published first. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Near-verbatim matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 5 Nov 2026, 22:25 | 90 | -1 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 21:49 | 91 | -1 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 02:40 | 92 | +2 |
| 9 Oct 2026, 21:20 | 90 | -1 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 21:56 | 91 | +1 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 03:07 | 90 | -1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 14:02 | 91 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 22:38 | 91 | first reading |
13 posts held, back to 11 March 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 13 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 March 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
The owner of this channel has been inactive for the last 11 months. If they remain inactive for the next 29 days, they may lose their account and admin rights in this channel. The contents of the channel will remain accessible for all users.
Amnesty 🇪🇸 1:1 pena de muerte / death penalty Part 7 Part 1 https://t.me/AmnestyOneToOne/95 So again, AMNESTY AND CAROLYN HOYLE (= University of Oxford) ARE FAKE SCIENCE AND INFOS! where Carolyn is 1000x better than Amnesty BUT STILL YEARS AWAY FROM BEING PERFECT! https://t.me/CarolynHoyle Not just them, even John Bessler and co. are BULLSHIT! https://t.me/JohnBessler https://t.me/DeathPenaltyMafia Please don't c…
Amnesty 🇪🇸 1 to 1 about pena de muerte / death penalty facts Part 6 Part 1 https://t.me/AmnestyOneToOne/95 El efecto de la abolición en los índices de delincuencia - The effect of abolition on crime rates En Canadá, por ejemplo, el índice de homicidios por 100.000 habitantes descendió del 3,09 en 1975, el nivel máximo alcanzado y correspondiente al año anterior a la abolición de la pena de muerte para el d…
Amnesty 🇪🇸 1 to 1 about pena de muerte / death penalty facts Part 5 Part 1 https://t.me/AmnestyOneToOne/95 The estimated effects of capital punishment on homicide rates change dramatically even with small changes in econometric specifications!!! https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/328 LIKE WE SAID! is not just about "death penalty yes or no"! It's MORE COMPLEX! Fourth, have all the relevant variables been taken into ac…
Amnesty 🇪🇸 1 to 1 about pena de muerte / death penalty facts Part 4 Part 1 https://t.me/AmnestyOneToOne/95 So Carolyn Hoyle in this part of the book IS NOT writing bad things! It's exactly like what we are saying! THERE IS NO EVIDENCE FOR BEING PRO OR CONTRA RELATED TO THE TOPIC DETERRENT! but don't come here with the bullshit "no death penalty = less homicides!" BECAUSE THIS IS BULLSHIT! https://t.me/LawsTelegram/…
Amnesty 🇪🇸 1 to 1 about pena de muerte / death penalty facts Part 3 Part 1 https://t.me/AmnestyOneToOne/95 "Nor is there any reason to change the judgment made in 1985 that the data ‘are not sufficiently strong to lead researchers with different prior beliefs to reach a consensus regarding the deterrent effects of capital punishment" "Most of those who favour abolition (assuming that they are not opposed to execut…
Amnesty 🇪🇸 1 to 1 about pena de muerte / death penalty facts Part 2 Part 1 https://t.me/AmnestyOneToOne/95 Los estudios científicos realizados no han podido nunca encontrar pruebas convincentes que demuestren que la pena capital tiene mayor poder disuasorio frente a la delincuencia que otros castigos. Scientific studies have never been able to find convincing evidence that capital punishment has a greater deterre…
Amnesty 🇪🇸 1 to 1 about pena de muerte / death penalty facts Part 1 Una vez que se ha abolido la pena de muerte, rara vez se restablece ... Once the death penalty has been abolished, it is rarely reinstated. Obviously IF THIS IS NOT POSSIBLE AT ALL! https://t.me/JohnBessler/132 and there is even 🇪🇺 EU MAFIA! https://t.me/DeathPenaltyMafia using 🇪🇺 council and other mafia methods to contrast that https://t.me/DeathP…
10 raisons d’abolir la peine de mort 1 to 1 with Amnesty Part 2 Part 1 https://t.me/DeathPenaltyOneToOne/613 ✅🙅♂️ 7 - la peine de mort ne ramène ni la stabilité sociale ni la paix intérieure des victimes. https://t.me/DeathPenaltyOneToOne/379 🙅♂️ 8 - la peine de mort nie la faillibilité des institutions humaines. https://t.me/DeathPenaltyOneToOne/379 https://t.me/DeathPenaltyOneToOne/380 🙅♂️✅ 9 - la peine …
10 raisons d’abolir la peine de mort 1 to 1 with Amnesty 🙅♂️ 1 - la peine de mort viole le droit à la vie https://t.me/DeathPenaltyOneToOne/375 🙅♂️ 2 - la peine de mort est une sanction cruelle et inhumaine. https://t.me/DeathPenaltyOneToOne/375 https://t.me/DeathPenaltyOneToOne/376 https://t.me/DeathPenaltyCruel https://t.me/JohnBessler https://t.me/DeathPenaltyMafia https://t.me/ShittyDeathExecutions 🙅♂️ 3 -…
Here we go our point of view about child rape: no prison 💩 < doing nothing with few years prison 💩 < death sentence + VIP SUICIDE = execution immediately / after few months / years 💩 (except for cannibalism) since this would probably just worse child abuse / rape! < (or =) castration + parole 💩 < castration 🥉< life sentence🥈 < death sentence + execution after 20+ years 🥇❤️ 100% proof: 💉 death sentence + execution a…
Chemical Castration ... There is just one thing: DEATH PENALTY! nothing other! Part 6 Part 1 https://t.me/RapeTelegram/2119 Let we check what @AmnestyShit is writing .... Forced chemical castration violates the absolute prohibition of torture and other cruel, inhuman and degrading treatment or punishment under international human rights law .... https://perma.cc/XSL4-2RH4 Ok was better to not check that ... Amne…
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @AmnestyOneToOne. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 34 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Amnesty One To One - 10 reasons to NOT abolish the death penalty / 10 raisons pour NE PAS abolir la peine de mort” (@AmnestyOneToOne), 90 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/AmnestyOneToOne.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.