Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Radiology

Channel

Radiology

@Radiology_videos

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

49,460subscribers

-278 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001429331507
TypeChannel
Username@Radiology_videos
DescriptionContact admin @murtazakuchay for any Queries/promotion/copyright issue
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live25 September 2026
Measurements held34
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 25 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/Radiology_videos

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

49,46049,76749,613.56 August 2026 — 49,738 subscribers6 August 2026 — 49,742 subscribers7 August 2026 — 49,755 subscribers8 August 2026 — 49,767 subscribers11 August 2026 — 49,761 subscribers12 August 2026 — 49,750 subscribers13 August 2026 — 49,755 subscribers14 August 2026 — 49,764 subscribers16 August 2026 — 49,754 subscribers17 August 2026 — 49,749 subscribers18 August 2026 — 49,743 subscribers19 August 2026 — 49,750 subscribers20 August 2026 — 49,758 subscribers21 August 2026 — 49,756 subscribers22 August 2026 — 49,751 subscribers24 August 2026 — 49,714 subscribers25 August 2026 — 49,697 subscribers26 August 2026 — 49,691 subscribers27 August 2026 — 49,686 subscribers28 August 2026 — 49,690 subscribers29 August 2026 — 49,680 subscribers30 August 2026 — 49,679 subscribers31 August 2026 — 49,685 subscribers1 September 2026 — 49,671 subscribers2 September 2026 — 49,670 subscribers3 September 2026 — 49,656 subscribers5 September 2026 — 49,641 subscribers8 September 2026 — 49,583 subscribers11 September 2026 — 49,557 subscribers13 September 2026 — 49,553 subscribers14 September 2026 — 49,533 subscribers16 September 2026 — 49,523 subscribers18 September 2026 — 49,524 subscribers25 September 2026 — 49,460 subscribers6 August 202625 September 2026
34 measurements spanning 50 days, net -278. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 49,414–49,813 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 34
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
25 Sept 2026, 06:5749,460-64
18 Sept 2026, 21:3749,524+1
16 Sept 2026, 16:2149,523-10
14 Sept 2026, 23:2149,533-20
13 Sept 2026, 09:3949,553-4
11 Sept 2026, 09:3849,557-26
8 Sept 2026, 16:3949,583-58
5 Sept 2026, 12:5849,641-15
3 Sept 2026, 16:1549,656-14
2 Sept 2026, 09:4349,670-1
1 Sept 2026, 10:3549,671-14
31 Aug 2026, 07:5349,685+6
30 Aug 2026, 05:4449,679-1
29 Aug 2026, 07:0749,680-10
28 Aug 2026, 10:2549,690+4
27 Aug 2026, 10:4649,686-5
26 Aug 2026, 12:2849,691-6
25 Aug 2026, 15:4249,697-17
24 Aug 2026, 12:2649,714-37
22 Aug 2026, 18:0649,751first reading

Engagement

33 posts held, back to 10 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 103 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
10.0%
avg views ÷ 49,460 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,960
5 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.1%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
5
of 33 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 4 of 5 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 22 September 2026
Posts held33 (10 May 2026 – 22 September 2026)
Views total24,820
Reactions total23
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken25 Sept 2026, 08:04 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
110
Videos
44
Links
35

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 25 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

315 reactions across 29 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 76.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤24176.5%
👎257.94%
👍237.30%
🔥92.86%
🤣82.54%
👏51.59%
🥰20.635%
😁10.317%
🙏10.317%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 31 of the 33 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 315 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 33 most recent posts we hold, published 10 May 2026 to 22 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

21 Sept 2026, 04:24 UTC≈2,380 views1 reactionsread 25 September 2026
Poll

Hypertranslucent chest X-ray is seen in all except

  1. A.Mcleod syndrome15%
  2. B.Emphysema24%
  3. C.Pneumonectomy48%
  4. D.Poland syndrome13%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

❤1

28 Aug 2026, 17:54 UTC≈7,210 views20 reactionsread 25 September 2026

Coffee bean sign is seen in? a) Gastric volvulus b) Sigmoid volvulus c) Hypertrophic pyloric stenosis d) Midgut volvulus Correct Answer - B Sigmoid volvulus REF: Wofganag 5th e p: 846/748 Sign Rat tail appearance Bird beak appearance Beak sign/double track/ tram track Medusa head colonies on CT Pincer/claw/coiled spring/target/meniscus sign Coffee bean sign Lead pipe appearance String of kantor/bull's…

❤18👍1🔥1

27 Aug 2026, 12:48 UTC≈7,280 views2 reactionsread 25 September 2026

Correct Answer - D Caldwell view is the occipito frontal view. The frontal sinuses are seen clearly in this view.

❤2

26 Aug 2026, 10:16 UTC≈7,150 views9 reactionsread 25 September 2026

SCIWORA, stands for Spinal Cord Injury Without Obvious Radiolographical Abnormality, is seen in children due to increased flexibility of the spine. Patient will show the signs of damage of spinal nerve despite the CT and X-ray show no evidence of fracture. Therefore, MRI is needed in such cases to identify the nerve damage.

🔥6❤3

23 Aug 2026, 12:18 UTC≈7,270 views10 reactionsread 25 September 2026

Just 1 week to NEET PG. One week between you and an exam that can influence so much of your life: Your work satisfaction. Your future income. Your recognition. Your city. Your working culture. Your professional freedom. But remember one thing: You don’t need more resources now. You need focus, revision and execution. 7 days. No distractions. No panic. Give it everything. 🔥 The exam is not asking whether you stu…

❤7🔥2🙏1

22 Aug 2026, 14:22 UTC≈6,440 views9 reactionsread 25 September 2026

Dense metaphyseal bands are not seen in primary hyperparathyroidism. There is increased bone resorption in primary hyperparathyroidism whereas dense metaphyseal bands are formed due to increased bone deposition and/or reduced osteoclastic remodeling. Causes of dense metaphyseal bands (DENSE LINES) D - D vitamin intoxication E - Element arsenic N - Normal variant S - Syphilis (congenital) E - Estrogen to mother…

❤9

16 Aug 2026, 08:34 UTC≈9,340 views0 reactionsread 25 September 2026

Correct Answer - B Carcinoma esophagus REF: sabiston's 18' edition chapter 41 See table in the previous question "Rat-tail" appearance on barium study is seen in carcinoma esophagus.

Showing the 12 most recent of 33 posts we hold for @Radiology_videos. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 5 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

21 Sept 2026, 04:24 UTCAnonymous Quiz728 voters

Hypertranslucent chest X-ray is seen in all except

  1. A.Mcleod syndrome15%
  2. B.Emphysema24%
  3. C.Pneumonectomy48%
  4. D.Poland syndrome13%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

25 Jul 2026, 18:12 UTCAnonymous Quiz2,570 voters approx.

Least penetrating power among following mentioned rays is in -

  1. A.Alpha rays54%
  2. B.Beta rays10%
  3. C.Gamma rays19%
  4. D.X-ray16%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

23 Jul 2026, 07:44 UTCAnonymous Quiz2,190 voters approx.

Mechanism of heat loss in modern X-ray tube is

  1. A.Radiation63%
  2. B.Evaporation11%
  3. C.Conduction15%
  4. D.Convection11%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

18 Jul 2026, 22:47 UTCAnonymous Quiz2,150 voters approx.

Hypertranslucent chest X-ray is seen in all except

  1. A.Mcleod syndrome16%
  2. B.Emphysema24%
  3. C.Pneumonectomy46%
  4. D.Poland syndrome14%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

8 Jul 2026, 13:06 UTCAnonymous Quiz2,580 voters approx.

Mechanism of heat loss in modern X-ray tube is

  1. A.Radiation63%
  2. B.Evaporation11%
  3. C.Conduction16%
  4. D.Convection10%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 33 most recent posts we hold, published 10 May 2026 to 22 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 29 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

RADIOLOGY - AIM4PG
@aim4pgradiology · 4,314
#1
NeuroRadiology_mustreads
@neurorad_mustreads · 12,772
#2
RadioGyan - Radiology Made Easy by Amar Udare MD
@RadioGyanDotCom · 13,784
#3
Radiology Updates
@Radiology_Updates · 5,787
#4
Radiology utilities
@radioapp · 5,224
#5
Revise Radiology Channel
@reviseradiology · 4,914
#6
Buy Radiology Courses
@Buy_Radiology_Videos · 5,591
#7
RADIOLOGICAL ANATOMY
@radiological_anatomy · 16,476
#8
Abdominal Ultrasound
@Abdominal_Ultrasound · 5,426
#9
X-RAY/ULTRASOUND ACADEMY
@radiographyvideos · 8,235
#10
PaedsImagingQuizzesMZeba
@pediaImagingQuizesMZeba · 1,420
#11
Anatomy embryology histology videos & books
@anatomyvideoss · 90,513
#12
Emergency Medicine - Academics, Papers and MRCEM Prep.
@ERAcademics · 2,160
#13
Clinic-O-Pulmono-Logical👩‍⚕🧑‍⚕🚑
@xraydiscuss · 6,097
#14
Pulmonary Academy
@PulmonaryAcademy · 2,979
#15
PULMONARY MEDICINE AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
@xqEks3_5O78wODJl · 1,169 (as read 26 August 2026)
#16
Neurology Courses
@neurology_course · 5,683
#17
Surgery 🩺
@Surgery_Videos · 23,075
#18
The FOCS Ultrasound Academics
@TheFOCSAcademics · 14,531
#19
CHATGPT IN RADIOLOGY
@radiology_chatgpt · 3,076
#20
Zaky Ortho Files
@zaky_ortho_files · 8,382
#21
Radiology_Board Review
@Radiology_Boardd · 11,298
#22
Dr aditya sanjay Gupta
@Dr_aditya_Gupta · 2,185
#23
Medical rad 🇪🇹
@MedicalRadeth · 5,032
#24
Crash course Anatomy & physiology 2026
@crash_course_updated · 4,401
#25
Radiology Diagnostic Imaging
@Diagnostic_Imaging · 7,052
#26
Radiology short cases
@shortradiology · 14,188
#27
RadEdAsia: Report with Confidence
@radiologyedasia · 2,601
#28
CT SCAN & MRI RADIOLOGY
@ctmriradiology_career · 5,089
#29
CNS, H&Neck Imaging Quizes
@CNSQuizesbyMZeba · 2,468
#30
Radiology Board Review
@RadiologyBoardReview · 5,788
#31
Musculoskeletal Imaging
@MSK_learning · 5,713
#32
RADIOLOGY(CT/MRI) CLASS
@radiologyclass · 2,871
#33
MSK Made Easy
@mskmadeeasy · 3,212
#34
MSK Radiology Quizes by MZeba
@MSKQuizMZeba · 3,406
#35
Radiology Alternate Pathway USA by @dr.taneja
@drtaneja · 7,004
#36
IRIA Samrakshan
@samrakshan · 1,479
#37
Human Anatomy For. Exam
@D124RAY · 700 (as read 26 August 2026)
#38
King of radiology🤍🖤
@kingofradiology97 · 7,509
#39
Verbal aptitude
@Deepikaawasthi · 1,570
#40
Quant & LRDI by RAVI KUMAR
@maths_rksir · 2,111
#41
CAT & 99 Percentile(Official Channel link in bio)
@bharatsirmaths · 2,697
#42
Anesthesia books📚
@Anesbook101 · 4,691
#43
Radiology Training
@RadTrain · 1,985
#44
Radiology Support
@radiologysupport · 1,346
#45
Surgery 37
@surgery37B · 1,870
#46
QA Prep By Udit Saini
@catprepudit21 · 4,078
#47
Dr. Estifanos(MD, Psychiatrist)-ዶ/ር እስጢፋኖስ
@DrEstif · 2,890
#48
Neurology, Neuroradiology, Neurosonology & Neurophysiology
@rusneurocenter · 2,069
#49
٭رڪن هـادئ🤎٭♭
@wiwiehci344 · 445
#50
Derma sce dr .lana
@scederma · 1,141
#51
HigherEd Jobs 2023 Group 49th
@HigherEdJobs202349thGroup · 220
#52
OBSTETRIC/GYNECOLOGY
@obstetricsandgynecology · 4,508
#53
3D & 4D Ultrasound
@Ultrasound4D · 2,291
#54
Честная медицина
@secondopinions_ru · 416
#55
BongoTech255🎮🔻
@bongoTechs255 · 2,264
#56
TUS'un karakuTUSu
@tusun_karakutusu · 7,366
#57
⚕️Medical science⚕️
@bottsk8071 · 1,199 (as read 26 August 2026)
#58
Emergency Medicine's Rock Stars
@EMRockStars · 3,509
#59
Dr. Qadiijo Medical PDF, VIDOE, PPT & WORD
@MamaQadiijo · 1,976
#60
Рентгенология
@gg011gg_Xr · 1,934
#61
What’s your ulam pare? (Mess hall version)
@whatsyourulammesshall · 2,656
#62
FEFU campus
@fefucampusforeign · 519
#63
Pi coin Buyer ( Legit & Trusted )
@picoinbuyertrusted55 · 371
#64
DOGS Community
@dogs · 7,065,215
#65
မြင်ကွင်းသစ်မီဒီယာ
@myinkwinthit · 1,456 (as read 26 August 2026)
#66
Match Mentor
@residencymatchmentor · 1,068
#67
Amazing Articles
@articlegroup · 1,861
#68
Binance Future Free Signals
@BinanceFree_Signals1 · 5,117
#69
RadioLOGY_Science
@sradiology · 1,959
#70
Radiology Notes For Exam.
@radionotesforexam · 8,147
#71
Blum: All Crypto – One App
@blumcrypto · 14,188,780
#72
Notcoin Community
@notcoin · 8,573,554
#73
Mhan Htet Aung
@mhatips · 807
#74
Radiologic_world
@Radiologic_world · 8,225
#75
CATS Community
@Cats_housewtf · 7,850,625
#76
BANKNIFTY ROCKET CALL 🚀🚀
@ROCKET_CALL · 5,197
#77
Kashmir University
@kashmiruniversity5 · 982
#78
MedicBrainTeasers
@medicalquestionsandanswers · 3,208
#79
Economy by Aman Soni
@economy_by_aman_soni · 4,411
#80

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 26 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Anatomy embryology histology videos & books
@anatomyvideoss · 90,513
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 26 August 2026
Surgery 🩺
@Surgery_Videos · 23,075
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 19 September 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Radiology” (@Radiology_videos), 49,460 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Radiology_videos.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.