Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Forensic medicine

Channel

Forensic medicine

@forensicmedicine_videos

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

28,512subscribers

-166 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001372326415
TypeChannel
Username@forensicmedicine_videos
DescriptionContact admin @murtazakuchay for any Queries/promotion/copyright issue
CreatedBetween 1 April 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live25 September 2026
Measurements held33
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 25 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/forensicmedicine_videos

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

28,51228,72028,6166 August 2026 — 28,678 subscribers6 August 2026 — 28,681 subscribers7 August 2026 — 28,684 subscribers8 August 2026 — 28,709 subscribers9 August 2026 — 28,713 subscribers10 August 2026 — 28,711 subscribers11 August 2026 — 28,712 subscribers12 August 2026 — 28,711 subscribers13 August 2026 — 28,702 subscribers14 August 2026 — 28,708 subscribers16 August 2026 — 28,707 subscribers17 August 2026 — 28,715 subscribers20 August 2026 — 28,720 subscribers22 August 2026 — 28,717 subscribers23 August 2026 — 28,708 subscribers25 August 2026 — 28,691 subscribers26 August 2026 — 28,684 subscribers27 August 2026 — 28,683 subscribers28 August 2026 — 28,685 subscribers29 August 2026 — 28,680 subscribers30 August 2026 — 28,672 subscribers31 August 2026 — 28,664 subscribers1 September 2026 — 28,646 subscribers2 September 2026 — 28,642 subscribers3 September 2026 — 28,635 subscribers5 September 2026 — 28,615 subscribers8 September 2026 — 28,579 subscribers11 September 2026 — 28,560 subscribers13 September 2026 — 28,550 subscribers14 September 2026 — 28,542 subscribers16 September 2026 — 28,537 subscribers18 September 2026 — 28,533 subscribers25 September 2026 — 28,512 subscribers6 August 202625 September 2026
33 measurements spanning 50 days, net -166. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 28,481–28,751 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 33
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
25 Sept 2026, 03:5828,512-21
18 Sept 2026, 18:1728,533-4
16 Sept 2026, 10:3928,537-5
14 Sept 2026, 16:3928,542-8
13 Sept 2026, 04:0128,550-10
11 Sept 2026, 06:5528,560-19
8 Sept 2026, 10:3928,579-36
5 Sept 2026, 06:1728,615-20
3 Sept 2026, 10:1228,635-7
2 Sept 2026, 03:2528,642-4
1 Sept 2026, 06:4628,646-18
31 Aug 2026, 04:1428,664-8
30 Aug 2026, 04:3428,672-8
29 Aug 2026, 07:5928,680-5
28 Aug 2026, 05:3528,685+2
27 Aug 2026, 07:4528,683-1
26 Aug 2026, 04:3828,684-7
25 Aug 2026, 01:3328,691-17
23 Aug 2026, 12:0328,708-9
22 Aug 2026, 00:5628,717first reading

Engagement

31 posts held, back to 11 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 68 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
6.38%
avg views ÷ 28,512 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,820
8 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.063%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
8
of 31 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 5 of 8 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 24 September 2026
Posts held31 (11 June 2026 – 24 September 2026)
Views total14,547
Reactions total6
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken25 Sept 2026, 06:25 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
14
Links
32

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 25 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

90 reactions across 20 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 92.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤8392.2%
👍22.22%
💊22.22%
🥰22.22%
🔥11.11%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 25 of the 31 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 90 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 31 most recent posts we hold, published 11 June 2026 to 24 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

24 Sept 2026, 13:37 UTC274 views0 reactionsread 25 September 2026

Correct Answer - A Answer- A-Examine the Lymph node Tattoo marks are permanent when dye penetrates the dermis. Infrared photography makes old tattoos readily visible. A faded tattoo mark becomes visible by the use of ultraviolet lamp 4 or rubbing the part and examining with a magnifying lens. Marks are recognized even in decomposed bodies(Aret) when the epidermis is removed. Lymph nodes near the tattoo mark show pigm…

23 Sept 2026, 13:36 UTC603 viewsread 25 September 2026
Poll

Relatives of a patient told during postmortem examination that the person had a tattoo - which was now invisible. How to identify?

  1. A.Examine the Lymph node55%
  2. B.Spectrophotometer38%
  3. C.Ordinary light5%
  4. D.X-ray2%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

5 Sept 2026, 09:03 UTC≈2,100 views4 reactionsread 25 September 2026

Correct Answer - A A i.e. Bisexuality - Abnormal & unorthodox sex play by using unusal objects or parts of body are known as paraphillia eg. Sadomasochism, Transvestism, Uranism, Beastality, Fortteurism, Urolangia, Homosexuality etc. - Bisexuality means hermaphrodite i.e. an individual with both ovary & testis & external genitals of both sexes.

❤4

30 Aug 2026, 06:32 UTC≈2,660 views1 reactionsread 25 September 2026

NEET PG 2026 RECALL will be updated in @doctorusmle group in a while Join @doctorusmle for recall discussion #NEETPG26recall

❤1

29 Aug 2026, 04:25 UTC≈2,050 views1 reactionsread 25 September 2026
Forwarded from @oncology_vid

🚨 NEET PG 2026 DOCUMENT CLARIFICATION 🩺 A few important clarifications regarding the documents to carry on exam day: ✅ 1. ADMIT CARD ▪️ If your admit card consists of 2 pages, print BOTH pages in COLOUR on ONE A4 white sheet, BACK-TO-BACK. ▪️ Page 1 → Front side ▪️ Page 2 → Back side ▪️ Do not print only one page. 📌 2. REGISTRATION CERTIFICATE ▪️ Carry a COLOUR photocopy of your valid Permanent/Provisional SMC/MCI…

❤1

23 Aug 2026, 12:18 UTC≈3,000 views4 reactionsread 25 September 2026

Just 1 week to NEET PG. One week between you and an exam that can influence so much of your life: Your work satisfaction. Your future income. Your recognition. Your city. Your working culture. Your professional freedom. But remember one thing: You don’t need more resources now. You need focus, revision and execution. 7 days. No distractions. No panic. Give it everything. 🔥 The exam is not asking whether you stu…

❤4

18 Aug 2026, 07:56 UTC≈3,390 views6 reactionsread 25 September 2026

Correct Answer - C The choking lessens the rate of spread of shot after it leaves the muzzle, increases the explosive force and increases the velocity. Shotguns have variable choke adapters. Different degrees are known as full-choke, half-choke and quarter-choke or improved cylinder. Ref: The Essentials of Forensic Medicine and Toxicology by K S Reddy, 27th edition, Page 184.

❤6

Showing the 12 most recent of 31 posts we hold for @forensicmedicine_videos. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

23 Sept 2026, 13:36 UTCAnonymous Quiz248 voters

Relatives of a patient told during postmortem examination that the person had a tattoo - which was now invisible. How to identify?

  1. A.Examine the Lymph node55%
  2. B.Spectrophotometer38%
  3. C.Ordinary light5%
  4. D.X-ray2%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 31 most recent posts we hold, published 11 June 2026 to 24 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 29 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

Thatcoolprofessor
@thatcoolprof · 1,567
#1
Forensics Digest-M.Sc
@forensicsdigestmsc · 1,544
#2
SavvyForensics
@savvyforensics · 4,507
#3
Autopsy
@forensic_autopsy · 12,592
#4
Forensic Science
@allaboutforensicscience · 7,607
#5
The BookShelf (Biology Books)📚
@thebookshelff · 11,322
#6
UGC NET-JRF Forensic Science World😎
@forensicscienceworld · 2,012
#7
Forensic science MCQs( for UGC-NE T preparation,Bsc. ,Msc.students) 🩸💉🧬🔫💣🔪🕵‍♀🕵‍♂⚖🔬
@fsmcq · 2,302
#8
Quant by Prabal sir
@prabalsirmaths · 5,610
#9
BIOLoGY TeChnOLoGY
@biotechnology_here · 8,239
#10
𝐁𝐢𝐨𝐭𝐞𝐜𝐡𝐧𝐨𝐥𝐨𝐠𝐲: IIT JAM, GATE & GATB
@iitjambiotechnology · 12,240
#11
🅑 TheBiomics - CSIR, GATE, ICMR, DBT, TIFR, GRE, GAT-B, IIT
@theBiomicsChannel · 8,972
#12
Ophthalmology step 2 videos & books 2026
@Ophthalmologyvideos · 7,161
#13
Forensic Field
@forensicfield · 2,650
#14
🎯MICROBIOLOGY MCQ & NOTES 🎯 🔬🧬🦠🧫📚🎯
@microghg · 11,811
#15
DBMCI Official
@DBMCIOfficialChannel · 44,409
#16
Cerebellum BTR 2.0 Notes
@Cerebellum_btr_pdf · 3,984
#17
CA Ruchi Nahar Research Analyst (SEBI REGISTERED)
@caruchinaharresearchanalyst · 171 (as read 9 September 2026)
#18
Flats by Hussain
@Flatssamarkanduzb · 947
#19
বাংলা কমিকস | Bengali Comics
@bencompdf · 4,755
#20
Keys of Soul
@keysofsoul · 1,346
#21
(47 Graduates 🎓 ) - المفاضلة 5
@spring9920 · 4,024
#22
مؤسسة الخدمات الإحصائية والاقتصادية S.E.A
@SEAStatEco · 2,895
#23
Cubick 🎧
@cubicksound · 1,062
#24
Ph.D and Postdoctoral Vaccancy position
@phdvacancy · 5,359
#25
HD & 4K Anime Wallpapers
@Anime_Wallpapers4 · 58,658
#26
FMGE | NEXT | USMLE | PLAB | KROK with Nextillo
@nextillowonder · 1,072
#27
4K Wallpapers
@pc_mobile_wallpapers · 66,516
#28
SISTEMA
@sistema_21 · 2,919
#29
طب عام وجراحه
@nany2020 · 4,793
#30
Libros en Criminalística y Ciencias Forenses
@CriminalisticayCienciasForenses · 3,656
#31
Science Memes
@science_memez · 4,656
#32
Hindustan Times- Official Channel
@hindustantimes · 63,216
#33
Jasur Rizayev | Rasmiy kanali
@rizayev_jasur · 11,500
#34
Dark Space
@darkspace · 7,604
#35
SamMU Education
@sammu_education · 4,539
#36
LoksattaLiveOfficial
@LoksattaLiveOfficial · 15,349
#37
Educational!
@Educational_tg · 9,767
#38
Mind Blowing Facts
@MindBlowingFacts · 14,119
#39
الفضاء - SPACE .
@SP3CE · 7,844
#40
Researchersjob🔬🧬🧿🦠⚗
@RJresearchersjob · 10,456
#41
Did You Know
@Didyoureallyknow · 16,540
#42
Current Affairs by Mohit Sir
@currentaffairsbymohitsir · 58,017
#43
Tech, Science & Innovation
@Tech_Science_Innovation · 38,185
#44
Books community:- ebooks novel fiction romantic motivational 📖📚
@Ebookspdfdownloads · 25,728
#45
Новости Узбекистана • @NovostiUZ
@NovostiUZ · 79,182
#46
Science4all - Best Scientific Channel
@scientific · 10,615
#47
Comics Art (Marvel/DC)
@comics_art_Marvel_DC · 19,238
#48
Interesting Engineering
@ieofficial · 65,952
#49
Science in telegram
@science · 120,230
#50
Memes
@bestmemes · 104,635
#51
Quick Sarkari (QuickSarkari.Com)
@quick_sarkari · 225,689
#52
Herophilos
@SHE5wn · 15,709
#53
Sarcasm
@sarcasm9 · 61,761
#54
The New York Times
@nytimes · 181,877
#55
Mint Business News - Official Channel
@livemint · 113,206
#56
Москва промышленная
@prommoscow · 77,704
#57
Telegram News
@telegram · 9,533,681
#58
DOGS Community
@dogs · 7,065,215
#59
Hamster Kombat Announcement
@hamster_kombat · 20,830,171
#60
Blum: All Crypto – One App
@blumcrypto · 14,360,001
#61
Notcoin Community
@notcoin · 8,573,554
#62
Мир сегодня с "Юрий Подоляка"
@yurasumy · 2,672,095
#63
Proxy MTProto
@proxymtproto · 11,940,791
#64
Yescoin
@theyescoin · 5,697,036
#65
Geography by Manuj Sir
@geographybymanujsir · 830
#66
Ajey buva Ramdasi (Sajjangad)
@ajeybuvaramdasi · 244
#67
Trading Mindset officials ™️
@Tradingmindset_CFA_Khushal · 402 (as read 9 September 2026)
#68
Ebenezer San Antonio AC
@EbenezerSanAntonio · 259
#69
Markay Latimer Trades
@markaytrades · 519
#70
Apostle Jean-Pierre Bekker
@jeanpierrebekker · 513
#71

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 9 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

4K Wallpapers
@pc_mobile_wallpapers · 66,516
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 38 here — alongside 37 others — read 22 August 2026
HD & 4K Anime Wallpapers
@Anime_Wallpapers4 · 58,658
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 47 here — alongside 46 others — read 22 August 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Forensic medicine” (@forensicmedicine_videos), 28,512 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/forensicmedicine_videos.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.