Channel
@reviseradiology
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
4,914subscribers
+74 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001176633541 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @reviseradiology |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 14 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/reviseradiology |
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 13 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 23:17 | 4,914 | +7 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 09:37 | 4,907 | +4 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 04:21 | 4,903 | -1 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 10:20 | 4,904 | +4 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 09:11 | 4,900 | +10 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 14:14 | 4,890 | +7 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 16:43 | 4,883 | +7 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 12:55 | 4,876 | +2 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 19:34 | 4,874 | +13 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 22:12 | 4,861 | +5 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 13:58 | 4,856 | +8 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 02:05 | 4,848 | +9 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 02:56 | 4,839 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 23:15 | 4,840 | first reading |
21 posts held, back to 27 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 7 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 21 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
11 reactions across 7 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 90.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 10 | 90.9% | |
| 🎉 | 1 | 9.09% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 21 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 11 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 27 June 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Heading to AOCR in Singapore this month, here's where to find us. Our team will be at Stand A3, 20-23 August at Singapore EXPO. Come meet us at the stand to get your exclusive 20% off code. Message us to arrange a time: WhatsApp
Sitting FRCR Physics this September? The paper rewards understanding, not memorising. FRCR Part 1 Physics Online Summer Course: 12 - 15 Aug 2026 Meet our Physics faculty: Dr Ebinesh Arulnathan, Dr Lawrence Best, Dr Daniel Mapana, Dr Sabha Ahmed and Dr Rupali Sachdev. Enrol in the FRCR Physics summer course
Preparing for FRCR Physics? The syllabus is vast and the hard concepts don't always click - no matter how many hours you put in. Our Physics course is built to fix that: concise, syllabus-focused teaching that makes the difficult parts make sense. The course starts next week. Sit ready, not second-guessing. ⏰ Enrol in the FRCR Physics course → https://reviseradiology.com/event/frcr-part-1-physics-online-summer-co…
❤1
Preparing for FRCR Part 1? Anatomy and Physics reward completely different prep and studying them the same way leaves marks on the table. They reward completely different strategies In our Decoding Part 1 webinar, Dr Shaz mapped out where your approach to each module should split: how you manage your resources, how you use your time under exam conditions. Create a free account on our website and watch the full Deco…
You've read the textbooks. Done the question bank. So why doesn't FRCR Physics feel like it's clicking? However much you cover, you still feel behind. Those final weeks decide it, and you shouldn't be facing them alone. Structured plan, real mock exams, faculty who know the exam.…
❤2
Preparing for the FRCR can feel like a solo effort. Long shifts, revision squeezed into the gaps, and often no one around you sitting the same exam. If you're heading to AOCR in Singapore EXPO, 20–23 August this month, the next stage of your prep doesn't have to be one you navigate alone. Our Team will be there: Dr Koshy Jacob, Dr Syed Shahzad Hussain, Joanna Koshy and Becky Paul. Come and talk to the team about wh…
Revising FRCR Part 1 Anatomy and Physics the same way? That is the quiet mistake that costs marks. They reward opposite approaches. Anatomy is recognition: atlas plus timed practice until it is reflex. Physics is the reverse: one core book, concepts first. Our guide breaks down both, plus the six-month plan that gets candidates through. Read the full breakdown
If you're sitting FRCR 2A, you already know the hard part isn't the work. It's not knowing whether any of it is adding up. Most candidates end up revising around a full clinical job, pulling from question banks, notes and half a dozen courses that all say something different. There's no clear order to it, and no real way to tell if you're ready. Our FRCR 2A Autumn Course is built to fix that. Here's how it works: …
Sitting FRCR Physics this September? You've done the reading and the question banks and still don't feel ready. That's a confidence gap, not a revision one. Our faculty-led Physics course is built to close it before your sitting, structured teaching that gets you exam-ready instead of cramming the night before. 🎯 Enrol in the FRCR Physics course
❤1
The FRCR 2A is 240 questions across 6 subspecialties. Breadth is the challenge. Meet your guide 🎯 Dr Aprajita Mehta - MBBS, DMRD, EDIR, FRCR. 16 years at Fortis Memorial Research Institute. Published researcher. Active FRCR examiner. Three steps: Enrol. Learn. Pass. FRCR 2A Online Autumn Course 2026: Learn more and sign up here
You've studied the FRCR 2A syllabus. The exam asks for more. 2A tests how you apply what you know across every system, under time pressure. It's where well-prepared candidates still lose marks. Beyond the Syllabus: FRCR 2A - faculty-led webinar on how the paper actually works. Saturday 8 August at 17:00 UK Time with Dr Syed Shahzad Hussain Register for the free FRCR 2A webinar
❤3🎉1
Are you confused about what you need to do in the last few weeks before your September Part 1 Exam? What you need now is a sense of how to spend the hours you have left. In the session with our Global Programme Director, Dr Syed Shahzad, you'll move from confusion to clarity: • How to structure the revision time you have left • The mistakes that cost well-prepared candidates marks • How Part 1 rewards the way you …
Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @reviseradiology. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@reviseradiology edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Revise Radiology Channel” (@reviseradiology), 4,914 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/reviseradiology.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.