5 measurements spanning 7 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,382–5,388 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Aug 2026, 20:13
5,384
-1
10 Aug 2026, 02:41
5,385
-2
7 Aug 2026, 00:30
5,387
+4
6 Aug 2026, 03:36
5,383
no change
5 Aug 2026, 22:00
5,383
first reading
Engagement
21 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
6.28%
avg views ÷ 5,384 subscribers
Avg views / post
338
21 posts measured
Reaction rate
24.5%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
21
of 21 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026
Posts held
21 (3 August 2026 – 11 August 2026)
Views total
7,106
Reactions total
1,741
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
12 Aug 2026, 04:23 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
5m 17s
Average length
1m 19s
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,634 reactions across 19 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 18.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
301
18.4%
🔥
210
12.9%
👍
201
12.3%
😍
189
11.6%
🥰
181
11.1%
💯
173
10.6%
🎉
170
10.4%
🤩
165
10.1%
custom 5233335371487535814
15
0.918%
⚡
5
0.306%
🙈
5
0.306%
🍾
4
0.245%
🙏
4
0.245%
🏆
3
0.184%
👌
3
0.184%
😭
2
0.122%
🤗
2
0.122%
😎
1
0.061%
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 21 of the 21 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,741reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Как продвигать проект, если денег на рекламу пока нет?
🎬🎬🎬🎬🎬🎬
Начните с личных соцсетей, друзей, тематических сообществ и профессиональных контактов. В видео — несколько способов привлечь внимание к проекту без бюджета.
Из урока журналиста, автора и ведущей подкаста «Лёгкий формат» Анны Тыцик.
💚💚💚💚
➡️ Подписывайтесь на нас в MAX
«Сделай красиво» — как эту просьбу воспринимает дизайнер? И на что действительно стоит обратить внимание при создании визуала? Об этом и не только — в новом уроке курса «ТВ- и онлайн-журналистика».
📱📱📱📱📱📱📱📱
Делимся бэкстейджем со съёмок и небольшим фрагментом, в котором дизайнер Школы RT Кристина Алмиева объясняет, почему функциональность — одна из ключевых составляющих хорошего дизайна.
💚💚💚💚
➡️ Подписывайтесь н
Что тревожит телевизионщиков?
📣📣📣📣📣📣📣
Дизайнер, шеф-редактор, корреспондент и оператор канала RT ставят баллы самым нервным рабочим моментам. Только честные оценки и неожиданные размышления тех, кто каждый день трудится на пределе.
В комментариях поделитесь, какие ситуации вы оценили бы на 10/10 ⬇
💚💚💚💚
➡️ Подписывайтесь на нас в MAX
Фактчекинг — один из ключевых этапов работы журналиста.
✍️✍️✍️✍️✍️✍️✍️
Упростить его помогают специальные сервисы для анализа фото, видео и публикаций. О нескольких таких инструментах рассказал журналист и продюсер RT International Фаузан Аль-Рашид в уроке RT Academy.
🟢 Google Image Search
Сервис обратного поиска изображений. Помогает узнать, где фотография публиковалась раньше, и проверить, не используют ли стар…
📎Неделя в Школе RT
Полезные материалы
🟢 Как понять, когда согласование вопросов перед интервью оправдано
🟢 Как удержать внимание зрителя
🟢 Где искать гранты
🟢 Как зацепить зрителя
🟢 Три качества, которые востребованы у дизайнеров на RT
🟢 Как не потерять интерес к своему блогу
Новости
🟢 Провели экскурсию по RT для студентов Московского Политеха
🟢 Записали урок о создании и развитии блога
🟢 Сняли новые фотографии …
📢 Уже в августе выпускники Школы RT отправятся на Фестиваль новых медиа.
📆📆📆📆📆
В этом году в подмосковный образовательный центр «Сенеж» поедут 30 выпускников Школы RT разных лет — от участников 2020 года до выпускников недавних курсов по научно-популярной журналистике и программы для китаистов.
Для многих из них это возможность найти единомышленников, освоить новые форматы, обменяться опытом с коллегами и привезти…
Как не потерять интерес к своему блогу
📱📱📱📱📱📱📱📱
Запустить блог — не самая сложная задача. Гораздо труднее сохранить желание заниматься им спустя месяцы или даже годы.
В новом уроке Алёна Максимович, автор YouTube-канала «Максимович», автор Telegram-канала «Красивая политика», ведущая шоу «Дорогая редакция» и выпускница Школы RT рассказывает, что помогает не потерять мотивацию.
✅ Выберите тему, которая вам действи…
#Полезныесоветы от спикеров Школы RT
Руководитель службы «RT-Дизайн» Георгий Финогентов рассказывает о трёх качествах, которые востребованы у дизайнеров на RT.
В Telegram-канале «Джобстудей» как раз вышла актуальная вакансия.
💚💚💚💚
➡️ Подписывайтесь на нас в MAX
🥰19🔥15❤12🎉9💯8🤩6😍6👍3
Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @RTschool. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@RTschool edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
12 August 2026
Most recent edit
12 August 2026
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 15,875 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 18 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Школа RT” (@RTschool), 5,384 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/RTschool.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.