Тут вышел подкаст со мной 🥰 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gi4QDNZ1Mko
🔥8💘4custom 52513242450063722972custom 52829320646838393151

Channel
@annatytsiik
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Declared links · Cite this entry
119subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002339404189 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @annatytsiik |
| Description | 🗯️журналист, спикер 🪄автор и ведущая проекта о здоровье https://vk.ru/tytsikproject |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/annatytsiik |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Aug 2026, 04:32 | 119 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 03:16 | 119 | first reading |
9 posts held, back to 6 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 9 posts for this entry, the most recent from 23 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
134 reactions across 9 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 55 | 41.0% | |
| 🔥 | 33 | 24.6% | |
| 💘 | 26 | 19.4% | |
| custom 5292028045207552733 | 12 | 8.96% | |
| custom 5251324245006372297 | 5 | 3.73% | |
| custom 5332599611955622836 | 2 | 1.49% | |
| custom 5282932064683839315 | 1 | 0.746% |
Custom emoji. 4 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 134reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 6 April 2026 to 23 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @annatytsiik. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 9 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 6 April 2026 to 23 June 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Тут вышел подкаст со мной 🥰 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gi4QDNZ1Mko
🔥8💘4custom 52513242450063722972custom 52829320646838393151
Интервью с врачом-терапевтом, нутрициологом, фитнес-тренером Тиграном Серопяном👇🏽🔥
❤6🔥2💘1
Здоровые откровения Еще в апреле мы с Аней записали классный подкаст, где поговорили за жизнь, науку и религию - все как вы любите 😊 - Что лежит в основе вселенной? - Почему чем больше я изучаю, тем меньше знаю? - Наука и религия – есть ли точка пересечения? - Почему важно отделять науку от лженаук? (эзотерика и таро) - Как теоремы Гёделя объясняют неопределённость нашего мира? - Почему мы не можем просчитать будущ…
❤7💘3custom 53325996119556228362
Тигран - врач-терапевт, нутрициолог, фитнес-тренер. Между прочим, мой гастроэнтеролог тоже ему доверяет. А еще Тигран врач доказательной медицины, поэтому всякую ерунду вам точно никогда не посоветует.⭐️ Канал доктора: https://t.me/dokazatelnayaIsteriya
❤8🔥3custom 52920280452075527333
в моём проекте уже 11 выпусков! в пост вместилось только 10⭐️ за это время я успела и порадоваться и выгореть отдыхать, конечно, нужно, периодически себе это повторяю, но не всегда умею это делать❤️
❤12💘3🔥3custom 52920280452075527331
вот казалось бы, где я и где наука? но жизнь удивительная штука, ведь я трижды была на Конгрессе молодых ученых, не как ученый, конечно, но всё же была спикером курса по научпоп-журналистике, и еще много всего связывает с этим удивительным миром ученых ✨✨✨ в моём проекте «Здоровые откровения» вышло 2 новых выпуска: с физиком и с химиком и знаете, что самое интересное: в мире ученых есть место вере в Бога, и это п…
💘11custom 52513242450063722973custom 52920280452075527333
Однажды мы с гастроэнтерологом Сашей Приказчиковым решили, что нам нужен еще один полезный и добрый проект. Так родился «ДИАГНОЗ: ПАПА» - интервью об отцовстве, ценностях и жизни.😊 Мы стали отличной командой. Дружим семьями, у Саши, кстати, чудесный сын и супер-крутая жена Соня, которая восхищает меня своей силой духа.❤️ В гостях одного из выпусков проекта «ДИАГНОЗ: ПАПА» побывал Егор Задеба - физик, доцент НИЯУ М…
❤8🔥5custom 52920280452075527333
Оптимальный чек-ап для женщин. Этого достаточно. Все остальное -чаще всего лишнее, приводит к потере денег, времени и нервов. Сохраняйте и пересылайте близки)
❤9🔥4custom 52920280452075527332
5 выпусков «Здоровых откровений» с лучшими из лучших 🔥 ВК: https://vk.ru/tytsikproject YouTube: https://youtube.com/@annatytsik?si=KqV1ftof8KrF69cz
🔥8❤5💘4
Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @annatytsiik. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 223,156 of 1,549,376entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@annatytsiik named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
One URL this entry has put in its own public description, shown exactly as written there. A declaration, not a verified association— we measured that the description contained this text, and nothing more. It is not a claim that this entry owns, runs or is connected to whatever the link resolves to; a description is text anyone controls, and anyone can put anyone else’s URL into it. How this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Анна Тыцик | журналист” (@annatytsiik), 119 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/annatytsiik.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.