Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

WEITBLICK

@weit_blick

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

130subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001219123397
TypeChannel
Username@weit_blick
DescriptionManchmal tut es gut, die eigene Geschichte und Erfahrungen in den Blick zu nehmen oder schwierige Momente und Situationen zur Sprache zu bringen oder neue gemeinsame Ziele und Wünsche zu finden. Der Kanal informiert mit ständigen wechselnden Themen.
Created19 September 2020measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/weit_blick

Growth

1307 Aug 2026, 20:03 — 130 subscribers9 Aug 2026, 01:16 — 130 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 20:039 Aug 2026, 01:16
2 measurements spanning 1 day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 129–131 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Aug 2026, 01:16130no change
7 Aug 2026, 20:03130first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 2 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
7.81%
avg views ÷ 130 subscribers
Avg views / post
10.2
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
7.14%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026
Posts held20 (2 August 20268 August 2026)
Views total203
Reactions total1
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken9 Aug 2026, 01:16 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
11,500
Videos
8,340
Links
13,100

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
2h 14m
Average length
13m 29s

Measured directly from 10 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🤣1100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

8 Aug 2026, 14:04 UTC7 viewsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @WaldgangAlbdruckPhoto

In diesem Artikel wird der Grund für das mediale Narrativ der Wasserknappheit erklärt: „DURCHSCHAUBAR WIE BERGQUELLWASSER“ „[…]Wer nach dm Grund der Wasserknappheits-Erzählung fragt, stößt auf ein politisches Projekt: Vertreter mehrerer Parteien treiben seit längerer Zeit Pläne zur Besteuerung von Wasser voran. Mehrere Bundesländer führten bisher schon den „Wassercent“ ein. Bayern erhebt die Abgabe seit dem 1. Jul

8 Aug 2026, 11:00 UTC7 viewsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @simonevossPhoto

Alle kleineren bis großen Städte waren damals mit solchen Brunnen oder Trinkwasserpumpen ausgestattet. Oft waren sie sogar der Mittelpunkt eines Viertels oder einer Ansiedlung und stets zugänglich für alle. Aber auch vor den Toren der Stadt existierte meist so ein Frischwasserquell. Wie wohl die Qualität des Wassers in der alten Zeit gewesen ist.....? Und warum sind sie heute meist verschwunden? https://t.me/simon

8 Aug 2026, 10:57 UTC5 viewsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @simonevossPhoto

Man hat Euch angelogen über die Waldbrände Dieser französische Influencer beschuldigt große Energiegruppen, hinter den Waldbränden in Frankreich zu stehen. D1ST1 behauptet, dass diese Brände keine Unfälle sind, sondern absichtliche Handlungen für private Interessen. Der ernsthafteste Punkt, den er zuerst hervorhebt: In genau der Region, in der die großen Brände stattgefunden haben, behauptet er, gab es einen Plan f

8 Aug 2026, 06:31 UTC6 viewsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @PolitischeBilderPhoto

🟢 ➡️ Im Kanal @PolitischeBilder gibt es mehr 😇 🟢

6 Aug 2026, 19:30 UTC8 viewsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @ennognobofficialPhoto

Was wäre, wenn … die Drohne absichtlich zum Hangar in Leipzig gelangt ist, um einen sicherheitspolitischen Ausnahmezustand zu rechtfertigen, dadurch zukünftige Wahlen zu verhindern und somit die derzeitige Regierung an der Macht zu halten? Fragen erlaubt. Nachdenken erwünscht. Für mehr folgt: t.me/ennognobofficial

4 Aug 2026, 19:05 UTC12 viewsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @shirtzshopPhoto

Nicht nur im Sommer und nicht nur im Freibad. #Badeanstaltterror Shirt in 6 Farben: https://ebay.us/k81WNT

4 Aug 2026, 18:17 UTC10 viewsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @HolistischeGesundheitHeilungPhoto

🪑 Der Kanal für emotionale Intelligenz 🏝 Bleiben Sie gesund und besuchen Sie uns auf unseren Kanal - Ihre Holistische Gesundheit 📱 Instagram

4 Aug 2026, 18:13 UTC11 viewsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @wirsindvielmehrVideo

Ganz großes Kino der Wissenschaftsjournalistik! Da rücken die „Experten“ an, um die Rheintemperatur zu messen, und tun das mit voller Hingabe in einer drei Zentimeter tiefen Pfütze neben dem Fluss. Zwei Sekunden das Poolthermometer im Wasser geschüttelt, einmal dramatisch genickt – Messung abgeschlossen. Die vermeintlich dramatische globale Erderwärmung wird vermutlich vom selben Experten auf der Motorhaube eines s

4 Aug 2026, 15:50 UTC13 viewsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @DDR_kinderVideo

Ich wünsche euch einen schönen Sonntag Abend mit einem weiteren Teil von - Geheimnisvolle Orte - Berlin von unten – Geschichten aus dem Untergrund (2025) Hier findest du: Bahnhof Friedrichstraße – Agentenschleuse und Grenzpassage (2014) Hier findest du : Der Fernsehturm (2024) Kind der DDR 👫

4 Aug 2026, 15:48 UTC14 viewsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @BestOfAFDVideo

🔵 CSD-Anschlag: Die Sache stinkt zum Himmel Der "mutmaßliche" Täter vom Terroranschlag in Berlin wurde von der Polizei erschossen. Chefredakteur Jürgen Elsässer sagt: "Für mich wurde der Falsche erschossen." Ist Abdul B. nur ein Sündenbock und die wahren Täter auf der Flucht oder im Untergrund? 🔗 Quelle: https://youtu.be/Lsayc1ss08Q?is=vq-uUSI_JfHkFYc4 Abonnieren Für Mehr Widerstand https://t.me/BestOfAFD

2 Aug 2026, 08:11 UTC14 views1 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @UnzensiertV2Video

@unzensiert_infoseite Hat irgendjemand ein Beispiel was die sogenannten Minister inclusive Landräte, Bürgermeister Behördenmitarbeiter, etc., seit zig Jahren zum Wohle der Menschen/des deutschen Volkes macht❓ Dabei ist es egal wer Kanzler oder Kanzlerin war. Was hat denn eigentlich der Bundespräsident zu tun oder zu melden ❓ "Sie alle gemeinsam Zetteln nur Stunk an." @unzensiert / @unzensiertV2

🤣1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @weit_blick. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“WEITBLICK” (@weit_blick), 130 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/weit_blick.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.