کانال VIP ما رایگان شد استفاده کنید عزیزان🙏

Channel
TACTIC English
@PTEnglishtest1
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Polls · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
50,739subscribers
+624 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001236604497 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @PTEnglishtest1 |
| Description | آموزش تکنیک های مهم زبان انگلیسی معرفی مراجع، کانال ها و آموزشگاههای معتبر برای تبلیغات به آیدی ادمین پیام دهید 👇 @shkh77212 |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 64 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 9 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/PTEnglishtest1 |
Topic
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 91% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Nov 2026, 21:58 | 50,739 | -50 |
| 8 Nov 2026, 13:15 | 50,789 | -46 |
| 7 Nov 2026, 06:59 | 50,835 | -40 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 03:50 | 50,875 | -3 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 03:18 | 50,878 | -13 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 05:38 | 50,891 | +42 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 08:35 | 50,849 | -17 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 06:35 | 50,866 | +11 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 04:21 | 50,855 | -25 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 04:20 | 50,880 | -22 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 01:40 | 50,902 | +36 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 02:47 | 50,866 | -7 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 00:10 | 50,873 | +52 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 00:08 | 50,821 | +17 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 03:31 | 50,804 | +13 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 02:26 | 50,791 | -20 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 01:39 | 50,811 | -7 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 23:56 | 50,818 | +29 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 01:30 | 50,789 | +31 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 19:31 | 50,758 | first reading |
Engagement
321 posts held, back to 15 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 195 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 0.884%
- avg views ÷ 50,739 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 448
- 105 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 105
- of 321 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 321 (15 July 2026 – 10 November 2026) |
| Views total | 47,087 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 11 Nov 2026, 00:33 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈2,520
- Videos
- ≈3,570
- Links
- ≈5,240
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 50m 21s
- Average length
- 1m 26s
Measured directly from 35 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 105 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
🔻تو این شرایط بازار دلیلی نمیبینم که از اعضا برای ورود به VIP پول بگیرم 🙏دعای خیرتون برای ما کافی است لینک ورود : 👇
سرمایتو چندبرابر کن 🔻JOIN آموزش هک و برنامه نویسی از پایه (فول رایگان 🔻JOIN کانفینگ رایگان V2RAYNG نامحدود 🔻JOIN بزرگترین کتابخانه رایگان تلگرامم 🔻JOIN آموزش حسابداری تخصصی 🔻JOIN منبع تمام بازی های هک شده 🔻JOIN سیر تا پیاز هک و امنیت (فول رایگان) 🔻JOIN دانلود [مستقیم فونت] رایگان 🔻JOIN جزوه های پولی رایگان شده (PDF) 🔻JOIN برترین کانال فیلترشکن پرسرعت رایگان 🔻JOIN کانال حسابداری و آموزش اکسل و مالی 🔻JOIN …
✳️متون_نیویورک_تایمز ❇️ساختارهای فوق العاده و ترجمه پست قبل ✅None of the challenges have thus far stopped the committees هیچ یک از چالشها تاکنون کمیته را باز نداشته است ✅Example: No challenges have thus far stopped me. هیچ چالشی تاکنون مرا باز نداشته است. ✅given the closed-door nature of their work باتوجه به ماهیت غیر علنی کارشان ✅prominent new avenues of inquiry could always emerge راههای جدید مهمی از ت…
♻️اصطلاح امروز ❇️My treat ✅مهمون من 1️⃣Let's go get some ice cream, my treat ✅بزن بریم بستنی بزنیم مهمون من نکات بیشتر در این کانال👇 https://t.me/PTEnglishtest/535
🏷 با این کانال ها آموزش ببینید و وارد بازار کار شوید و کسب درآمد کنید 🛑 https://t.me/addlist/WEHlbKX3TXc0OGI0
🤩اشتراک های هوش مصنوعی رو با بهترین قیمت تهیه کن!! @GptPluserBot ▪️▪️▪️▪️▪️▪️▪️▪️▪️ ⛳️ @Armisstab .
⭕️ فقط امشب به مدت 2 ساعت عضویت بازه ⭕️ .
🦋 کلی متن پرامپت معماری برای Chat GPT 👇🏽 🔻 https://t.me/+kOTevqJNUadhMjFk ▪️▪️▪️▪️▪️▪️▪️▪️ 🔰آرشیو "فونت تایپوگرافی" رایگان @i_font 🔰وب، HTML، CSS، جاوااسکریپت، SEO و.. @AmoozeshWebsite 🔰دانلود " ابزار های گرافیکی" رایگان @editorclub 🔰همهابزارهای هوشمصنوعی یکجا+آموزش @Max_Academy 🔰ژست و فیگور عکاسی @positionn 🔰بانک لایه باز رایگان @psd_gram 🔰آموزش 0 تا 100 هک ،امنیت(رایگان) @Black_Security 🔰دنیای نرم افزار …
✳️نکات ساده اما مهم ❇️دقت کنید که Believe in صحیح است و نگویید Believe to ✅ مثال 1️⃣They don't believe in living together before marriage. آنها معتقد به زندگی با هم قبل از ازدواج نیستند. 2️⃣Some people believe in life after death. برخی از مردم به زندگی پس از مرگ معتقدند. تکنیک های بیشتر در این کانال👇 https://t.me/PTEnglishtest/535
مجموعه جملات آكادميك با معجوني از كالوكيشن هاي خوب و نمره بيار نکات بیشتر در این کانال👇 https://t.me/PTEnglishtest
🔥 هیچوقت برای رسیدن به علائق دیر نیست❗️ ✅ عاشق یادگیری هر مبحث و مطلبی که هستید، میتوانید از لیست بالا بصورت #رایگان پیدا کنید👌
Showing the 12 most recent of 321 posts we hold for @PTEnglishtest1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 4 posts on @PTEnglishtest1 as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
- First seen missing
- 7 August 2026
- Most recent seen missing
- 8 August 2026
- Median time before seen missing
- 40 hours
- Seen missing in the last 30 days
- 0
Polls
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
جای خالی را پر کنید👇 She couldn’t help... when she saw it.
- To laugh30%
- laughing59%
- To laughing11%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
جای خالی را پر کنید👇 She couldn’t help... when she saw it.
- To laugh31%
- laughing58%
- To laughing11%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 321 most recent posts we hold, published 15 July 2026 to 10 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 172 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
@android_best · 44,68140 postsVoxel studios 3D Object
@Voxel3DVray · 64,14040 postsAndroid Developers
@Android0to100 · 62,36135 postsمرکز آموزش کامپیوتر
@AmoozeshWebsite · 96,85434 postsWindows APP
@Narmafzarpc · 55,46034 postsآموزشهای کامپیوتر و موبایل
@Pc_IT_Mob · 92,00034 postsComputer & IT Engineering
@Computer_IT_Engineering · 189,50330 postsPython Forever
@PythonForever · 131,93630 postsProgramming <-> برنامه نویسی
@Amozesh_4u · 29,41028 postsBlack Security Team
@Black_Security · 63,87527 postsشاترپیک | عکس و وکتورهای با کیفیت و رایگان
@shutterpic · 46,02525 postsWriting & Grammar 👨🏫
@writingandgrammar · 57,85923 postsiGraphical
@iGraphical · 66,17922 postsژست برتر عکاسی
@positionn · 68,73322 postsفونت برتر
@FontBartar · 113,93321 postsانگلیسی با رضا آرش نیا
@arashniaenglish1 · 74,59820 postsآموزش فتوشاپ ،گرافیک و هوش مصنوعی
@limostudy · 51,51920 postsGrammatical 👨🏫👩🏫
@usuk1 · 49,59520 postsآموزش برنامه نویسی | Programming
@WorldCode · 76,76819 postsCoponClub | کد تخفیف
@CoponClub · 66,38118 postsکالی لینوکس | Kali linux | ترفند | کامپیوتر | تکنولوژی
@kali_linuxxx · 76,51518 postsفیلترشکن و پکیج/خبر
@Net_IR_free · 39,63618 postsتوییتر دانشجویی
@Twitterjo · 49,00218 posts🟡 آموزش ترید ₿ | اندیکاتور VIP
@VIPPKG · 63,90418 posts
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@PTEnglishtest · 59101 posts📱android_best
@android_best · 44,68166 postsAndroid Developers
@Android0to100 · 62,36162 postsمرکز آموزش کامپیوتر
@AmoozeshWebsite · 96,85461 postsComputer & IT Engineering
@Computer_IT_Engineering · 189,50359 postsProgramming <-> برنامه نویسی
@Amozesh_4u · 29,41056 postsکانال تبادلات پر جذب آرمیس
@Armisstab · 1,62351 postsBlack Security Team
@Black_Security · 63,87548 postsگروه معماری چهارسوق
@CHAHAR_SOOGH_archi_gp · 14,97048 postsArras and Design
@Design_groooup · 12,61548 postsEngineeringReverse | مهندسی معکوس
@EngineeringReverse · 21,70848 postsEnglish Unique | آموزش زبان انگلیسی
@english_uniquee · 19,40548 postsآموزشهای کامپیوتر و موبایل
@Pc_IT_Mob · 92,00048 posts❰❰ آموزش مقالهنویسی ISI ❱❱
@akhtar_electronic_group · 19,85947 postsWindows APP
@Narmafzarpc · 55,46046 posts• ɪɴꜰᴏ ᴅɪɢɪᴛᴀʟ •
@info_digital66 · 9,72745 postsهوش مصنوعی| علم داده
@AILearnCamp · 21,15344 postsمهندسی کامپیوتر
@devloper98 · 12,62244 postsمهدی هک | آموزش هک و امنیت™
@Mahdiihack · 20,48743 postsEnglish online
@Eng_Online · 36,42142 postsEnglish animations
@anime4english · 11,36341 postsEnglish Listening Practice
@EnglishListeningPractice1 · 10,36341 postsمکالمات روزمره انگلیسی
@ESL4You · 16,14541 postsLearn english with movies
@howimetyourmotherrr · 15,55941 posts
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 7
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 6
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 1
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@PTEnglishtest1 named 7 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Evidenced gone
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
named in 6 posts, 8 August 2026 – 18 September 2026 · confirmed gone 3 November 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
named in 3 posts, 18 August 2026 – 23 September 2026 · confirmed gone 7 November 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
named in 3 posts, 8 August 2026 – 18 August 2026 · confirmed gone 15 October 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
named in 1 post, 27 September 2026 – 27 September 2026 · confirmed gone 7 November 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
named in 1 post, 12 September 2026 – 12 September 2026 · confirmed gone 4 November 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
named in 1 post, 10 August 2026 – 10 August 2026 · confirmed gone 14 October 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 99 posts, 8 August 2026 – 7 November 2026
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@Englishgrammar606 · 50,329#1
@Eng_Online · 36,421#2
@bodoenglish_org · 10,491#3
@english_uniquee · 19,405#4
@English_With_Rahmani · 9,699#5
@English_cafe8 · 12,815#6
@grobP1 · 26,841#7
@writingandgrammar · 57,859#8
@English_Far30 · 2,130 (as read 25 August 2026)#9
@english_cafe · 19,355#10
@English_lang_learners · 20,370#11
@IELTSclubs · 7,245#12
@ZabanNeshan · 6,396#13
@tarjjommee · 22,818#14
@english1388 · 66,222#15
@grammarfad · 17,001#16
@English_ili · 31,316#17
@bestidioms4you · 7,525#18
@howimetyourmotherrr · 15,559#19
@mopodenglish · 2,178#20
@English_ltt · 19,569#21
@EnglishForYou_Original · 11,646#22
@Englishnutsbolts · 10,213#23
@FreeEnglishQuiz · 74,135#24
@idiom7 · 4,526#25
@policyinact · 7,666#26
@music_lyrics_tele · 10,075#27
@vocab7ir · 4,692#28
@parisateaches · 8,306#29
@pictorial_english · 12,885#30
@EnglishConversationIsEasys · 59,542#31
@Abedini_LgAcademy · 47,850#32
@englishbyphoto · 2,929#33
@y4y2020 · 1,522#34
@OstadAtayee_Branch5 · 1,870#35
@hamidrezasotoudeh98 · 74,644#36
@Radio_Zaban · 22,966#37
@Ielts7Academy · 1,344#38
@EnglishInAMinute7 · 2,202#39
@zabanban · 7,815#40
@improveReading · 20,417#41
@English_Mr_Karimi · 59,687#42
@English_Video_EV · 6,334#43
@usuk1 · 49,595#44
@collocationsin10m · 7,362#45
@phonetic_conversation · 11,359#46
@learn_for_keeps · 7,973#47
@Computer_Science100 · 46,749#48
@INFORMATIONINSTITUTE · 13,029#49
@English_with_Majidi · 2,320#50
@EN_4_KIDS · 10,114#51
@basicenglishlearner · 16,185#52
@grammarquiz7 · 4,253#53
@voa_learning_english · 74,324#54
@VR_learning_english · 9,297#55
@WeeklyEnglish53 · 8,799#56
@oxfor · 13,137#57
@RealEnConversations · 16,468#58
@Pegasus_mind · 3,864#59
@ariajohari_sources · 4,783#60
@rahmaniquiz · 3,757#61
@OnlineConversationSchool_Film · 21,505#62
@class_englysh · 28,089#63
@EPT_MSRT_PhD · 1,111#64
@EnglishMarya · 14,444#65
@engmarya_k · 25,173#66
@faryadsoocoot · 853#67
@language_political · 4,021#68
@Zaban7ir · 12,434#69
@BesazBadan · 10,626#70
@driving_school1 · 19,909#71
@sanatdostt · 1,769#72
@qodrattaqeer · 4,732#73
@ordmenpodcast · 4,418#74
@GovernanceStudies · 2,546#75
@easy_englishgrammar · 25,895#76
@drbarahimi · 5,672#77
@Englishpakage3 · 1#78
@phd_master · 4,069#79
@FrenchAvecMoi · 14,754#80
@Radmentoring · 6,362#81
@amozesh_co · 17,497#82
@midonikee · 6,579#83
@FitnessBody97 · 5,972#84
@majalleye_ketab · 9,133#85
@PdfBooks33 · 3,693#86
@ketabkhane_eng · 1,899#87
@shabakehmag · 15,349#88
@Arabicfassih · 13,744#89
@iranmindset · 23,621#90
@FR_IRQ · 13,457#91
@civilizers · 1,581#92
@mozikbikalem · 26,718#93
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 25 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@English_lang_learners · 20,370
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 26 September 2026
@grobP1 · 26,841
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 11 September 2026
@Eng_Online · 36,421
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 1 September 2026
@english_cafe · 19,355
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 1 October 2026
@English_ili · 31,316
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 9 September 2026
@Englishgrammar606 · 50,329
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 25 August 2026
@english_uniquee · 19,405
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 3 October 2026
@tarjjommee · 22,818
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 20 September 2026
@english1388 · 66,222
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 21 August 2026
@usuk1 · 49,595
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 27 August 2026
@improveReading · 20,417
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 26 September 2026
@Radio_Zaban · 22,966
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 21 September 2026
@Abedini_LgAcademy · 47,850
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 26 August 2026
@EnglishNovin · 25,239
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 14 September 2026
@writingandgrammar · 57,859
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 23 August 2026
@driving_school1 · 19,909
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 28 September 2026
@hamidrezasotoudeh98 · 74,644
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 20 August 2026
@easy_englishgrammar · 25,895
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 13 September 2026
@class_englysh · 28,089
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 10 September 2026
@voa_learning_english · 74,324
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 21 August 2026
@EnglishConversationIsEasys · 59,542
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 21 August 2026
@OnlineConversationSchool_Film · 21,505
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 25 September 2026
@En_audiopodcasts · 23,217
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 18 September 2026
@englishcrv · 62,980
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 21 August 2026
This channel appears in 36 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“TACTIC English” (@PTEnglishtest1), 50,739 subscribers as measured 9 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/PTEnglishtest1.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.