بی دقتی عوامل اجرایی باعث شده سربرگ جدا نشه من نتونم تصحیح کنم که باز باید بازبینی بشه و اینا زمان اعلام نتایج رو به تاخیر میندازه…
💔4
Signed ARSIN

Channel
@englishbyphoto
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
2,940subscribers
-20 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001051775385 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @englishbyphoto |
| Created | Between 1 May 2016 and 28 February 2017 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 15 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/englishbyphoto |
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 15 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 96% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 05:16 | 2,940 | +1 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 16:00 | 2,939 | -3 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 11:14 | 2,942 | -3 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 11:19 | 2,945 | -3 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 00:36 | 2,948 | -2 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 23:38 | 2,950 | -2 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 16:48 | 2,952 | +2 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 20:04 | 2,950 | -2 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 11:15 | 2,952 | -6 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 07:46 | 2,958 | +1 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 04:18 | 2,957 | -1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 23:32 | 2,958 | -4 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 18:40 | 2,962 | +2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 05:03 | 2,960 | no change |
| 5 Aug 2026, 23:48 | 2,960 | first reading |
23 posts held, back to 15 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 23 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
142 reactions across 20 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 74 | 52.1% | |
| 💔 | 19 | 13.4% | |
| 💯 | 18 | 12.7% | |
| 🍾 | 11 | 7.75% | |
| 😍 | 9 | 6.34% | |
| 🔥 | 6 | 4.23% | |
| 👏 | 3 | 2.11% | |
| 👌 | 1 | 0.704% | |
| 💘 | 1 | 0.704% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 23 of the 23 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 161 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 23 most recent posts we hold, published 15 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
بی دقتی عوامل اجرایی باعث شده سربرگ جدا نشه من نتونم تصحیح کنم که باز باید بازبینی بشه و اینا زمان اعلام نتایج رو به تاخیر میندازه…
💔4
Signed ARSIN
در حال تصحیح برگه های زبان انگلیسی بچه های یازدهم هستم…
❤3
Signed ARSIN
✍🏻دوستان این خط امتحان نهایی لایک نداره؟؟!!! یادبگیریم اینجوری و با حوصله بنویسیم…😍
💯4❤2
Signed ARSIN
#space_idiom 🚀 The researcher warned us not to shoot for the____without a realistic plan. ⭐️
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
❤3💔2👏1😍1
Signed ARSIN
بعضی از کانالها با دنبال کننده های زیادی پست های من و به اسم خودشون کپی پیست میکنن لطفا فوروارد کنید هر پست یه مدت وقت من و میگیره لطفا با ذکر نام همین کانال منتشر کنید🙏🙏🙏❤️❤️❤️
❤10💯1
Signed ARSIN
#idiom🗣️ #series_2016_2022 #animal_kingdom(season5) 💥Pack it up جمع کردن وسایل / بساط را جمع کردن 🔮Let’s pack it up. بیایید وسایل را جمع کنیم / بساط را جمع کنیم. 🔅It’s getting late, so we packed it up. دیر شده بود، بنابراین کار را جمع کردیم و رفتیم. 🪼Pack it up means: to put things away, to stop what you are doing, or to leave after finishing an activity. 🛡️Examples:👇🏼👇🏼👇🏼 🪭After the picnic, we packed it up and went …
❤7👏1
Signed ARSIN
#flower_idiom 💥The proposal looked attractive, but it was not all ____.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
❤4💔1💯1
Signed ARSIN
#idiom🗣️ #series(2026) #silo 🔅Yes. “#My_treat!” is a very common English idiom 🎯“It’s my treat.” = “مهمان من باش.” / “حسابش با من.” / “من دعوتت میکنم.” 💎Examples:👇👇 🔮A: Thanks for helping me move. B: My treat! Let’s have lunch. 🧿ممنون که در اسبابکشی کمکم کردی. **مهمان من باش! بیا ناهار بخوریم. 🛡️A: How much do I owe you? B: Nothing. My treat. 🏺چقدر باید بهت بدم؟ هیچی. مهمان من باش. 💈A: Let’s spli…
💯5❤2
Signed ARSIN
#idiom My treat 👇🏼👇🏼👇🏼🍔🍕
❤6👏1
Signed ARSIN
💥Great before having your hair cut
❤8🍾1
Signed ARSIN
💥Give the prompt above to DeepSeek or ChatGPT, upload your photo, and get a variety of hairstyles generated for you.💇🏻♂️
❤9💔1
Signed ARSIN
A 3×5 grid (15 hairstyle variations) for a single subject, based on the user’s own photo. Ultra-realistic, consistent facial identity across all 15 tiles, shallow depth of field, soft studio light, neutral backdrop, tactile hair textures, unisex fashion neutrality; Nanobanana-compatible and Gemini-safe. strict identity & presentation override: follow the reference for face, hair distribution, body structure and prese…
❤7
Signed ARSIN
Showing the 12 most recent of 23 posts we hold for @englishbyphoto. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 4 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
#space_idiom 🚀 The researcher warned us not to shoot for the____without a realistic plan. ⭐️
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
#flower_idiom 💥The proposal looked attractive, but it was not all ____.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
#grammar 💥Which sentence is correct?
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
#idiom🗣️ 👩🦰If someone says, “She has the Midas touch,” they mean she______ .💰
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 23 most recent posts we hold, published 15 July 2026 to 6 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 6 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“English by photo” (@englishbyphoto), 2,940 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/englishbyphoto.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.