Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Kate Sugak

Channel

Kate Sugak

@katesugakofficial

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,988subscribers

-6 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001685085981
TypeChannel
Username@katesugakofficial
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/katesugakofficial

Growth

1,9881,9941,9916 August 2026 — 1,994 subscribers6 August 2026 — 1,994 subscribers10 August 2026 — 1,993 subscribers13 August 2026 — 1,988 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 7 days, net -6. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,987–1,995 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 01:031,988-5
10 Aug 2026, 09:361,993-1
6 Aug 2026, 11:231,994no change
6 Aug 2026, 09:591,994first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 5 May 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 19 June 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
14m 07s
Average length
7m 04s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

1,018 reactions across 20 posts, in 21 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥28828.3%
👍26626.1%
23623.2%
👏605.89%
363.54%
💯333.24%
🤬262.55%
🏆222.16%
😢181.77%
😡80.786%
❤‍🔥60.589%
👀40.393%
👎40.393%
😱30.295%
💔20.196%
👌10.098%
😁10.098%
🙏10.098%
🤔10.098%
🤮10.098%
1 further kind10.098%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,018reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 5 May 2025 to 19 June 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

19 Jun 2025, 17:38 UTC≈7,760 views64 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

☠️ Euthanasia of patients in COVID hospitals. Many people have long referred to Covid “treatment” protocols as euthanasia. It’s hard to find another word for toxic drugs like Remdesivir and deadly ventilators. But few people know that in a number of countries, COVID patients have been subjected to real euthanasia – with the help of drugs that deliberately suppress breathing and lead to death. This was revealed by

21🤬20🔥7💯6👍32❤‍🔥1👌1

10 Jun 2025, 09:02 UTC≈2,930 views26 reactionsread 7 August 2026
File

🎧 From Vaccine to Paralysis 00:04 - Part 1: The story of Kayla Pollock 05:01 - Part 2: Where does science end? 📖 You can find links to sources in the text form of this article. ✅️Subscribe to my Telegram channel @katesugakofficial, where I debunk myths about vaccination, virology and the politics of fear – with facts, logic and uncompromising analysis.

🔥176👍3

9 Jun 2025, 17:12 UTC≈5,010 views49 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

⚡️ 🗓 On June 5, the U.S. Senate confirmed Jim O’Neill as Deputy Secretary of Health under Robert F. Kennedy Jr. At first glance, it might seem like a mere formality. But a closer look at O’Neill’s background reveals that he is a key figure in the new U.S. healthcare strategy. Jim O’Neill is a technocrat with deep ties to Palantir – a digital infrastructure serving intelligence, the military, and the pharmaceutical

👏1916👍112❤‍🔥1

3 Jun 2025, 20:11 UTC≈2,360 views44 reactionsread 7 August 2026
File

🎧 WHO and the Pandemic Agreement 00:04 - Part 1: Pandemic treaty 04:43 - Part 2: For your safety 08:53 - Part 3: Fear and manipulations 📖 You can find links to sources in the text form of this article. ✅️Subscribe to my Telegram channel @katesugakofficial, where I debunk myths about vaccination, virology and the politics of fear – with facts, logic and uncompromising analysis.

26👍11👏4🔥2❤‍🔥1

29 May 2025, 13:13 UTC≈5,240 views75 reactionsread 7 August 2026

​⚡️💉From Vaccine to 🌟👩‍🦼 Paralysis. Part 2️⃣ 🌟 Now ask yourself the most important question: Why are you allowing yourself to be injected with something built on an unproven theory – one that collapses under the slightest scrutiny? 💉 The entire concept of vaccination is based on the germ theory of disease, introduced in the 19th century by Louis Pasteur – a man who was accused of falsifications and plagiarism ev

🔥3921👏93💯2❤‍🔥1

29 May 2025, 13:11 UTC≈4,510 views56 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

⚡️💉 From Vaccine to 🌟👩‍🦼 Paralysis. Part 1️⃣ Kayla Pollock is a young woman from Canada. Before 2022, her life was full of energy. She worked with children, raised her son, and was active, vibrant, and full of life. 💉 When the COVID-19 vaccination campaign began, Kayla got all her shots, including the Moderna booster. She did it to keep her job and continue visiting her father in a nursing home. Just days after t

🔥22😢118👍6😡43👏1😱1

16 May 2025, 21:29 UTC≈8,200 views67 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

💉🦠WHO AND THE PANDEMIC TREATY. They control the world through belief — not force. Change the belief, and the whole system collapses. You can find the full article here ⬇️ 🔗 https://katesugak.substack.com/p/who-and-the-pandemic-agreement

🔥24💯17👍126👏52❤‍🔥1

16 May 2025, 15:18 UTC≈4,310 views61 reactionsread 7 August 2026

​ Part 3. And now they want this theatre to become official. So that next time they won’t have to justify themselves. So that they can simply say: “We signed a pandemic agreement. We are obliged to fulfill our obligations.” This is a way to justify in advance any actions in the next “pandemic” and to give official status to the mechanism by which they have already acted before. But that's not the point. The point

27👍16🔥7👏51❤‍🔥1👀1👎1

16 May 2025, 15:17 UTC≈3,740 views50 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Part 2. 🎯 COVID has become the perfect tool for solving many problems at once – and each of them has benefited those in power. 🔥🪙 First, it covered up the impending financial collapse. By 2019, the global economy was overheated, debt was at its limit, banks were holding tons of illiquid and loss-making assets. Having declared a “pandemic,” they crashed the markets according to the script, turned on the printing pre

👍25🔥117👀2😡21👎1😢1

16 May 2025, 15:17 UTC≈3,880 views42 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

💉🦠 WHO AND THE PANDEMIC AGREEMENT. Part 1. May 2025. The world is on the verge of signing the so-called “Pandemic Agreement” - an international treaty that, for the first time in history, enshrines the obligations of countries to act according to a pre-agreed scenario in the context of a declared “pandemic”. Whereas previously the World Health Organization (WHO) could only make recommendations, it will now coordin

👍23🔥86😡21👀1👎1

13 May 2025, 12:54 UTC≈1,710 views49 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Dear friends, please be careful — there are many impersonators pretending to be me, reaching out to people and trying to scam them. Please block and report them. I will never message you privately. Those who have chatted with me in private know that I use a completely different name, username and profile picture.

👍3655💯1🤔1😁1

6 May 2025, 16:16 UTC≈2,010 views38 reactionsread 7 August 2026
File

🎧 Another Fear Campaign: “Three Measles Deaths in the U.S.” – Truth or Propaganda? 00:26 - Case #1: A 6-year-old girl from Texas 01:40 - Is pneumonia really a “complication of measles”? 06:00 - Ventilation: A One-Way Road 07:23 - Case #2: An adult in New Mexico 09:33 - Case #3: 8-year-old Daisy Hildebrand from Texas 12:14 - Summary: 3 people. 3 deaths. 📖 You can find links to sources in the text form of this articl

22👍10👏6

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @katesugakofficial. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 78,678 of 1,480,944entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Kate Sugak” (@katesugakofficial), 1,988 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/katesugakofficial.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.