Photo, posted without a caption

Channel
Vax Verite
@vaxverite
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
7subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 13 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001261162481 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @vaxverite |
| Created | 23 December 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset) |
| First recorded | 13 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/vaxverite |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 04:57 | 7 | no change |
| 13 Aug 2026, 03:31 | 7 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 25 June 2021 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 25 October 2021. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 2m 44s
- Average length
- 2m 44s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
Unlock the strongest peer-reviewed argument against vaccine mandates. When an article in the BMJ argues in favour of mandatory vaccination and vaccine bribery, based on a grossly misleading comparison of mandatory vaccination to wearing seat belts or to paying taxes, it is picked up by 72 News Outlets: “Good reasons to vaccinate: mandatory or payment for risk?” BMJ Journal of Medical Ethics 2020. When my article in…
ENOUGH!!! HOW ABOUT A PLAN FOR 10 MILLION PEOPLE TO CALL THE FDA FOR ALLOWING A REDACTED “VACCINE” DISCLOSURE? 1-800-835-4709 10903 New Hampshire Ave, Silver Spring, MD 20993 https://www.fda.gov/media/151733/download
1-800-835-4709 FDA Tell them you want the Pfizer vaccine injection disclosure WITHOUT REDACTION You’re entitled to know what’s in the shots!!! This is not about the 15,000 dead
https://odysee.com/@BenSwann:6/43-of-parents-say-they-will-pull-their:8
https://www.youtube.com/watch
https://youtu.be/TJnbHUsv0Qk
https://rumble.com/vkrdx6-dr.-zelenko-speaks-to-a-rabbinical-court-in-jerusalem.html
https://rumble.com/vk5jd0-dr.-peter-mccullough-urgent-warning-about-poisonous-jabs-an-agonizing-situa.html
https://www.bitchute.com/video/haWSGlYUH2x2/
https://nzdsos.com/?fbclid=IwAR3mTLnC1FaIOM0vTXeGHxnD9u45EU6dm5k7YhA9uU3foWkhDdgHtHiiI3s
https://nzdsos.com/?fbclid=IwAR3mTLnC1FaIOM0vTXeGHxnD9u45EU6dm5k7YhA9uU3foWkhDdgHtHiiI3s
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @vaxverite. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,079,908 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Vax Verite” (@vaxverite), 7 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/vaxverite.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.