Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Nostra

@Nostra_Fx

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

20,383subscribers

-181 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001424167346
TypeChannel
Username@Nostra_Fx
Descriptionآیدی ادمین: @Nostra_ad 🔴اینستاگرام نسترا: Instagram.com/nostra.fx 🔵تلگرام نسترا: https://t.me/+VOMRsvI-5JP347Ho
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Nostra_Fx

Growth

20,38320,56420,473.57 August 2026 — 20,564 subscribers7 August 2026 — 20,564 subscribers8 August 2026 — 20,554 subscribers9 August 2026 — 20,526 subscribers9 August 2026 — 20,499 subscribers11 August 2026 — 20,473 subscribers12 August 2026 — 20,443 subscribers13 August 2026 — 20,422 subscribers14 August 2026 — 20,383 subscribers7 August 202614 August 2026
9 measurements spanning 7 days, net -181. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 20,356–20,591 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 16:2520,383-39
13 Aug 2026, 04:1320,422-21
12 Aug 2026, 02:0220,443-30
11 Aug 2026, 01:5720,473-26
9 Aug 2026, 23:4120,499-27
9 Aug 2026, 02:5420,526-28
8 Aug 2026, 00:4720,554-10
7 Aug 2026, 14:0020,564no change
7 Aug 2026, 13:4820,564first reading

Engagement

31 posts held, back to 12 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 19 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
6.97%
avg views ÷ 20,383 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,420
25 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.65%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
25
of 31 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026
Posts held31 (12 July 202611 August 2026)
Views total35,505
Reactions total940
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken14 Aug 2026, 19:54 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
3,110
Videos
133
Links
491

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

1,247 reactions across 31 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
55144.2%
🔥19115.3%
😍856.82%
👍836.66%
🙏645.13%
😱584.65%
👏554.41%
🤯504.01%
🫡332.65%
👌292.33%
❤‍🔥151.20%
🥰100.802%
💯70.561%
👨‍💻50.401%
😎50.401%
🏆40.321%
10.08%
🆒10.08%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 31 of the 31 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,247reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 31 most recent posts we hold, published 12 July 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 31 we hold a reading for · 6%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Nostra_Fx. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 31 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 12 July 2026 to 11 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

11 Aug 2026, 18:47 UTC589 views12 reactionsread 14 August 2026

برای استفاده از معاملات نیاز به پرداخت هزینه‌ای نیست کافیه وارد ربات @Nostra_Fx_bot بشید✅

😍12

11 Aug 2026, 18:45 UTC585 views14 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

خوشحالم که خوشحالید💚

11🫡3

11 Aug 2026, 18:45 UTC565 views10 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

شانسیه این واکنشا به نقطه ورود و تارگتامون؟🤔😉 ستاپ ناشناخته بهترین ستاپ روی انس جهانی طلا✅

6🔥4

11 Aug 2026, 18:45 UTC492 views7 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

واکنش اینجوری به تارگت شانسی نیست🔥👌🏻 استفاده کنید چون هرچی میزارم براتون معاملات شخصیه نه سیگنال👌🏻 ستاپ ناشناخته بهترین ستاپ دنیا برای انس جهانی طلا✅

👏52

10 Aug 2026, 19:43 UTC682 views13 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

امروز هم خداروشکر با ستاپ ناشناخته ۲ تا معامله زدیم هر دو با تارگت بسته شد😍🔥 اگه میخوای از فردا همراهمون باشی برو تو ربات @Nostra_Fx_bot و لینک کانال رو بردار و عضو شو💚 معاملات رو نگاه کنی تفاوت رو احساس میکنی👌🏻

🔥82😍2👏1

9 Aug 2026, 18:42 UTC838 views11 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

جوری لذت بردید از ستاپ جدیدی که رو انس جهانی طلا اجرا میکنیم که طاقت ندارید ۲ هفته دیگه هم بگذره😁💚 مطمئنم برای این ستاپ هم مثل SHR جوری میشه که اگه دیر بجنبی جا بمونی ترید واقعی اینجاست پیش نسترا جای دیگه دنبالش نباش👌🏻 برو تو ربات @nostra_fx_bot بزن رو ستاپ مکانیکی

9🔥2

9 Aug 2026, 18:33 UTC759 views5 reactionsread 14 August 2026

اگه نمیدونی داستان چیه این ویس رو گوش بده چون ۲ هفته بیشتر ازش نمونده🔥

🔥3🫡2

9 Aug 2026, 18:31 UTC754 views9 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Forwarded from @nostra_eduPhoto

روزی که ستاپ SHR رو به دنیای ترید معرفی کردم میدونستم یه روزی مردم باهاش عشق خواهند کرد الانم مطمئنم وقتی ستاپ ناشناخته رو یادشون بدم با انس طلا عشق بازی خواهند کرد👌🏻 پ.ن: ستاپ SHR رو تمام بازارها کاربرد داره، ستاپ ناشناخته فقط انس جهانی طلا👌🏻

7💯2

9 Aug 2026, 18:31 UTC724 views10 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Forwarded from @nostra_eduPhoto

از زیبایی باز شدن پوزیشن بگیم یا از زیبایی تارگت و واکنشش به تارگت؟😍 من که خدایی چیزی جز زیبایی نمیبینم😉 حق داری فکر میکنی شانسی و اتفاقیه چون هنوز ستاپ ناشناخته رو بلد نیستی😁🔥

8🔥2

1 Aug 2026, 17:53 UTC≈1,640 views54 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

❌این تحلیل فیل شد اینجا همه چیز واضح و شفافه و سود کنیم ضرر کنیم همه چیز با شهامت اعلام میشه💚 وقتی رو ۱۸۰هزار تومن بود انتظار داشتم با زدن نقدینگی یعنی ۱۸۷/۵ بریزه و خبر توافق بدن بابتش اما متاسفانه گرچه خبر توافق هم ساختند اما قدرتی برای اصلاح زیاد نداشت برای همین مجدد که برگشت رو ۱۸۷/۵۰۰ گذاشتم تو کانال که اگر کسی میخواست تبدیل کنه بتونه اما خودم رو تحلیلم موندم و الان بالای ۱۹۰ تثبیت داده و تحلیل تقریبا ۴ درصد حد

👏2516👌10❤‍🔥3

Showing the 12 most recent of 31 posts we hold for @Nostra_Fx. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

زدبورس | علی نیک افروز
@zburse_official · 147,137
Telegram ranks this channel #82 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 13 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Nostra” (@Nostra_Fx), 20,383 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Nostra_Fx.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.