Channel
@shoko_dark
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
23,579subscribers
-6,214 since we began measuring on 26 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001562718017 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @shoko_dark |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 26 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 28 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 34 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 28 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/shoko_dark |
Literature — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 74% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 28 Oct 2026, 07:46 | 23,579 | -16 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 05:17 | 23,595 | -24 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 05:36 | 23,619 | -14 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 07:25 | 23,633 | -18 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 07:36 | 23,651 | -22 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 05:18 | 23,673 | -19 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 02:30 | 23,692 | -27 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 21:30 | 23,719 | -17 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 22:26 | 23,736 | -17 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 19:18 | 23,753 | -18 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 20:27 | 23,771 | -24 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 19:26 | 23,795 | -8 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 18:47 | 23,803 | -23 |
| 14 Oct 2026, 18:20 | 23,826 | -28 |
| 13 Oct 2026, 07:06 | 23,854 | -74 |
| 8 Oct 2026, 23:37 | 23,928 | -95 |
| 4 Oct 2026, 15:39 | 24,023 | -747 |
| 26 Sept 2026, 11:58 | 24,770 | -482 |
| 19 Sept 2026, 11:56 | 25,252 | +1 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 01:02 | 25,251 | first reading |
28 posts held, back to 21 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 61 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 28 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 September 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
670 reactions across 20 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 14.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 💯 | 100 | 14.9% | |
| 👍 | 95 | 14.2% | |
| 🎉 | 86 | 12.8% | |
| ❤🔥 | 82 | 12.2% | |
| 💘 | 82 | 12.2% | |
| 🥰 | 82 | 12.2% | |
| 🔥 | 48 | 7.16% | |
| 👏 | 34 | 5.07% | |
| 😍 | 23 | 3.43% | |
| 👌 | 21 | 3.13% | |
| ❤ | 15 | 2.24% | |
| 🤣 | 2 | 0.299% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 28 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 670 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 28 most recent posts we hold, published 21 July 2026 to 5 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
نسل بعد هیچوقت نمیفهمه دیدن اسم دنیرو و پاچینو کنار هم روی پوستر، یعنی چی… بازیگری با نگاه و سکوت، نه با داد و افکت. بعضیها فیلم بازی میکنن، بعضیها فیلم رو مال زندگیت میکنن. @shoko_dark
❤1
بهشت، شاید نه یک جا؛ شاید یک کتابخانه باشد، یا خاطرهای که هنوز گرم مانده است... - بورخس @shoko_dark
👍2
گاهی اوقات باید تصمیم بگیری که: این آخرین باریه که اجازه دادم چنین حسی رو بهم بدن و روی حرفت وایسی ...! چه خانواده باشه، چه رابطه، چه دوستی ...! @shoko_dark
👍1
اما گاهی من آنقدر قوی نبودم که نشان دادم حتی گاهی آزرده تر از دیگران بودم، اما چون میدانستم کسی نیست که به او تکیه کنم، وانمود کردم همهچیز خوب است، شاید قوی نبودم، مجبور بودم . @shoko_dark
👏4
سخت ترین بخش بزرگ شدن از دست دادن آدم ها نیست ؛ از دست دادن تصویریه که ازشون توی ذهن خودت ساخته بودی. وقتی میفهمی اون همه اعتمادی که داشتی ، اون همه ارزشی که براشون قائل بودی ، فقط توی ذهن خودت واقعی بوده. بعد از اون ، دیگه کسی نمیتونه مثل قبل غافلگیرت کنه. نه چون بی احساس شدی ، نه چون دیگه دوست داشتن رو بلد نیستی ، فقط یاد گرفتی بین چیزی که آدمها میگن و چیزی که واقعا هستن ، همیشه یه فاصله وجود داره. از یه جایی ب…
👏2👍1
خدا کند به چشم بیایی... لطف کنی و به چشم بیایی، مهربان باشی و خوبی کنی و به چشم بیایی، تلاش کنی و بکاری و درو کنی و به چشم بیایی... که رنج عظیمیست آدمیزاد خارج از نقش و جایگاه و رسالت انسانیاش همهکار کند، اما به چشم نیاید! 👤نرگس صرافیان طوفان @shoko_dark
زیاده روی کردم؛ در دوست داشتن، در تلاش کردن، در حرف زدن، در اعتماد کردن، در غصه خوردن، در تفریح کردن، در خسته بودن، در تنها موندن، در زنده بودن، همیشه بیش از حد بودم. @shoko_dark
👍2
شبی که شناختمت از خوشحالی خوابم نبرد، شبی که شناختمت از ناراحتی خوابم نبرد. @shoko_dark
❤4
اگر جنگ نبود تو را به خانه ام دعوت میکردم و میگفتم: "به کشورم خوش آمدی چای بنوش، خسته ای..." برایت اتاقی از گل میساختم و شاید تو را در آغوش میفشردم اگر جنگ نبود تمام مین های سر راه را گل میکاشتم تا کشورم زیباتر به چشمانت بیاید اگر جنگ نبود مرز را نیمکتی میگذاشتم کمی کنار هم به گفتگو مینشستیم و خارج از محدوده دید تک تیر اندازان گلی بدرقه راهت میکردم اگر جنگ نبود تو را به کافه های کشورم میبردم و شاید دو جرعه به سلام…
روز خود را چگونه آغاز کردید؟! @shoko_dark
نمیگذرد؛ نمیدونم شاید هم میگذرد، اما در پس این گذر؛ از من چه باقی خواهد ماند؟ @shoko_dark
دنیای ترسناکی میشد اگر باطن آدما توی چهرههاشون مشخص بود . @shoko_dark
Showing the 12 most recent of 28 posts we hold for @shoko_dark. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 11 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 28 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“شکلات تلخ” (@shoko_dark), 23,579 subscribers as measured 28 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/shoko_dark.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.