Posted without readable text
❤5🔥3❤🔥1

Channel
@threesunschannel
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
461subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 30 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001726748552 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @threesunschannel |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 30 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 30 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/threesunschannel |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 30 Aug 2026, 06:45 | 461 | no change |
| 30 Aug 2026, 06:30 | 461 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 9 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (9 May 2026 – 27 August 2026) |
| Views total | 411 |
| Reactions total | 48 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 30 Aug 2026, 06:45 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 30 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
210 reactions across 20 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 65 | 31.0% | |
| 👍 | 42 | 20.0% | |
| ❤🔥 | 40 | 19.0% | |
| ❤ | 39 | 18.6% | |
| 🥰 | 20 | 9.52% | |
| 👏 | 3 | 1.43% | |
| 🤝 | 1 | 0.476% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 210reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 9 May 2026 to 27 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Posted without readable text
❤5🔥3❤🔥1
We have a new video on our channel Alertness. The secret Castaneda's Practice | You won't read it in books https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lhw2B1iyBUo Do you often feel like life isn't going according to plan, turning into a series of gray days where a clear sense of the path is lost? Carlos Castaneda and his life-affirming philosophy reveal that life is a Great Game called Earth, requiring impeccability and perso…
🔥6❤3👍3
Posted without readable text
❤7🔥4👍1
Posted without readable text
👍9❤🔥4🥰2
Posted without readable text
❤3🔥3
Posted without readable text
❤5🔥3❤🔥1
We have a new video here Find Out Where All Your Energy Has Gone: The Terrifying Secret Revealed by Castaneda. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3YahynNl5HA Enjoy your watching!
❤🔥3👍2
Let's talk today about why it happens that you suddenly lose interest in things or activities that previously inspired and captivated you. The situation is far from simple, and it's often unclear what to do about it. To answer this question, you need to look at it energetically. After all, according to Castaneda, a person is a magical being, composed of both physical and energetic parts. When we lose interest and …
🔥6❤3❤🔥2👍1
You are stronger than you think! But where is your Personal Power though? We all need Personal Power and energy. Personal Power will allow each of us to develop seeing—something the Warriors of the Spirit from don Juan's lineage strove for. But why can't we accumulate Personal Power? Because it is "captive" to our habits. We expend enormous reserves of Personal Power to live automatically, using habitual reaction…
❤4🔥3❤🔥2
Where does your Personal Power go? Personal Power is wasted on unnecessary, bad choices in life. This is why fatigue accumulates and indifference sets in. And here's why. Everyone, just like you, makes hundreds of choices in life. But have you ever considered how many of them you make consciously, and how many are made by someone inside you out of habit, without realizing the importance and consequences of the cho…
❤3🔥2❤🔥1👍1
We're all searching. Many people think they're on their own Spiritual Path. There's also a lot of talk about the Spiritual Path and Spiritual Realization, especially in difficult times. But do we all truly understand the "Spiritual Path" in the same way, or does everyone have their own definition, assuming everyone else thinks the same way? Let's explain to each other what the "Spiritual Path" is? Think about it…
🔥3🥰1
You've probably read more than one book and attended more than one workshop on how to live a happy and profound life, to feel in harmony with yourself, your loved ones, and nature every morning. It's likely that you've known the answers to these questions for a long time, but for some reason, you're likely still experiencing moments when it feels like a key link is missing, a feeling that everything you've learned i…
❤🔥3🔥3🥰2👍1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @threesunschannel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Three Suns” (@threesunschannel), 461 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/threesunschannel.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.