Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Photo F.A.Q.T.

Channel

Photo F.A.Q.T.

@fotofak

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

9,263subscribers

-13 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001726330869
TypeChannel
Username@fotofak
DescriptionПожалуй, лучший канал о фотографии. По всем вопросам сюда @Julia_Kurskaya Личный канал https://t.me/KurskayaPhoto
Created3 February 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/fotofak

Growth

9,2639,2769,269.56 August 2026 — 9,276 subscribers7 August 2026 — 9,276 subscribers10 August 2026 — 9,269 subscribers14 August 2026 — 9,263 subscribers6 August 202614 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 7 days, net -13. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,261–9,278 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 03:279,263-6
10 Aug 2026, 19:189,269-7
7 Aug 2026, 12:559,276no change
6 Aug 2026, 19:319,276first reading

Engagement

11 posts held, back to 16 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 15 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 11 posts for this entry, the most recent from 31 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
32,200
Videos
1
Links
476

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

353 reactions across 11 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 64.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
22864.6%
❤‍🔥5214.7%
👍3810.8%
🔥236.52%
💔123.40%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 353reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 16 May 2026 to 31 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

31 May 2026, 19:44 UTC≈2,460 views37 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

№1404, 1405, 1406 За три дня. Ничего не успеваю😅. #бесконечный_челлендж

23❤‍🔥6👍5🔥3

28 May 2026, 19:11 UTC≈2,660 views28 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

№1402, 1403 За два дня. Оптом. #бесконечный_челлендж

21🔥7

26 May 2026, 19:02 UTC≈2,190 views34 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

№1401 А сегодня уточки плавают. #бесконечный_челлендж

22🔥8❤‍🔥4

25 May 2026, 19:55 UTC≈1,990 views43 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

№1399, 1400 Маленький бельчонок кушает орешек😭 #бесконечный_челлендж

30👍8🔥3❤‍🔥2

23 May 2026, 20:23 UTC≈1,830 views30 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

№1396, 1397, 1398 За четверг, пятницу и сегодня. #бесконечный_челлендж

24❤‍🔥4🔥2

22 May 2026, 18:10 UTC≈1,730 views14 reactionsread 15 August 2026

Только что заметила, что вчерашнее фото не загрузилось. А оно ведь было. В последние пару дней, у меня загружаются фотографии в телеграмме. Видимо, придется копить и потом скопом выложить, что было

💔122

20 May 2026, 20:18 UTC≈1,780 views32 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

№1395 Вот такое. #бесконечный_челлендж

18👍9❤‍🔥5

19 May 2026, 20:05 UTC≈2,000 views46 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

№1394 Автопортретное. #бесконечный_челлендж

33👍10❤‍🔥3

18 May 2026, 20:50 UTC≈1,710 views20 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

№1393 Очень бешеная неделя намечается. #бесконечный_челлендж

19❤‍🔥1

17 May 2026, 20:01 UTC≈1,650 views30 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

№1392 Как же красиво все цветет. Сплошные цветы в последние дни. #бесконечный_челлендж

27❤‍🔥3

16 May 2026, 18:37 UTC≈1,520 views39 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

№1390, 1391 За вчера и за сегодня. Веселый вчера был пятничный вечер😅 #бесконечный_челлендж

❤‍🔥249👍6

Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @fotofak. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 853,524 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Photo F.A.Q.T.” (@fotofak), 9,263 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/fotofak.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.