Channel
@WiseForex
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
432subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001345212977 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @WiseForex |
| Description | I post stocks and Forex analysis here for swing trading strategy. Mostly higher timeframes. Main channel for Crypto - @WiseAnalyze |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/WiseForex |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 6 Aug 2026, 19:19 | 432 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 13:59 | 432 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 11 December 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 29 July 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
38 reactions across 11 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 55.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 21 | 55.3% | |
| 🔥 | 10 | 26.3% | |
| 💩 | 4 | 10.5% | |
| 😁 | 3 | 7.89% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 38reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 11 December 2023 to 29 July 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Gold lost its nearest support and dropped to 3301 ✅ It remains in a higher timeframe uptrend, which means the chances of a bounce toward 3350–3380 are high. If the price manages to reclaim and hold above 3350, continuation to the upside becomes likely. "Bearish" scenario: Last week XAU closed with a bearish candle and strong rejection, which could lead to a bull flag-style consolidation, with a potential bottom for…
🔥1
Gold remains within uptrend and above last week open (3367). Either will consolidate here and eventually bounce to continue uptrend, or lose that level and go down for liquidity under one of previous swings like 3310 and 3282. While in uptrend bias remains bullish and longs are in priority. 👉 Trade it at BingX exchange with 20% discount on fees. @WiseAnalyze #XAU #Gold
👍3
Trade gold, stock, forex and indices directly on your Bybit App! 🖤Sign up with https://partner.bybit.com/b/WiseAnalyze
Gold already made 3 attempts to breakout and now in a process of forth attempt. The more times resistance is tested the weaker it becomes - that is a golden rule. And therefore now chances for breakout are at their maximum. Nearest target levels are 2743 / 2762 / 2790 - after that open targets within ATH @WiseAnalyze #XAU #Gold #ta
🔥6
EURUSD Potential rejections from the bearish Flip zone , if it reaches in the coming days. @wiseforex #EURUSD
👍5
AUDUSD Local tops might be in Only IF the 5th wave is done. We might be able to catch short scalps within the next week. @wiseforex #AUDUSD
👍1
NDX long gave RR4:1 (so far) 💰💰💰 Safe stop loss remains under 17795, as within Monday-Tuesday possible dips <17880 (make sense to take partials if you haven't yet). @WiseAnalyze #NDX #update
Photo, posted without a caption
💩4😁3
Stock indices started year with correction. I see two main levels where I will be interested in longs. First one is an early bird under 4670, another is real strong SR under 4600. ⏰ Setting alarms for both 🔥 Trade SPX at BingX - ref link for 20% discount on perp futures fees @WiseForex #SPX #Stocks
👍2
GOLD broke out 🚀 🔥 Trade Crypto/Forex/Indices and commodities at BingX with crypto deposit - my ref link gives 20% perp futures fees discount @WiseAnalyze #XAU #Gold #ta
👍4
Some info to consider: * All stock indices closed this day with a dump. * Before that Nasdaq and Dow made new ATH and currently above 2022 open. SPX got stopped under same level. * Nine days till this year close - above 2022 open will be bullish. So from higher timeframe charts look pretty bullish. But the dump happened and there must be a reason. So short term expect either indices to revisit at least middle of las…
👍4
Condition for trade entry didn't happen 🤷🏼♂️
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @WiseForex. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 173,554 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Wise Forex & Stocks” (@WiseForex), 432 subscribers as measured 6 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/WiseForex.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.