Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Oliver’s Trade

Channel

Oliver’s Trade

@oliverstrade

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

18,270subscribers

-685 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001450330461
TypeChannel
Username@oliverstrade
DescriptionFormer head of research group at JPMorgan Chase Here I share my trades and setups Not a financial adviser
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 31 October 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 November 2026
Measurements held64
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/oliverstrade

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

18,27018,95518,612.56 August 202611 November 2026
64 measurements spanning 96 days, net -685. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 18,167–19,058 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 64
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Nov 2026, 00:0018,270-12
9 Nov 2026, 09:0918,282-12
7 Nov 2026, 22:4718,294-10
6 Nov 2026, 21:0818,304-8
6 Nov 2026, 00:1618,312-11
4 Nov 2026, 22:5018,323-10
2 Nov 2026, 23:4918,333-1
2 Nov 2026, 01:2918,334-9
1 Nov 2026, 01:2818,343-6
30 Oct 2026, 22:3018,349-12
29 Oct 2026, 18:5618,361-9
28 Oct 2026, 18:5818,370-1
27 Oct 2026, 17:1718,371-7
26 Oct 2026, 18:2818,378-5
25 Oct 2026, 18:5718,383-5
24 Oct 2026, 22:0018,388-7
23 Oct 2026, 21:4618,395-6
22 Oct 2026, 20:1818,401-9
21 Oct 2026, 15:5818,410-12
20 Oct 2026, 09:5518,422first reading

Engagement

49 posts held, back to 15 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 72 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
18.8%
avg views ÷ 18,270 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,440
1 post measured
Reaction rate
—
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
1
of 49 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 21 October 2026
Posts held49 (15 January 2026 – 21 October 2026)
Views total3,440
Reactions total—
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken11 Nov 2026, 04:19 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈3,060
Links
≈168

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 1 post held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

21 Oct 2026, 19:58 UTC≈3,440 viewsread 11 November 2026
Photo

$XRP is bouncing right off the 200DMA 👀 As long as it's printing a higher low I'm bullish 🚀

2 Oct 2026, 16:29 UTC≈8,600 viewsread 11 November 2026
Photo

$AAVE already printing +37% But that's nothing compared to what's coming in the next couple of years 🚀💰 If we get that dip to $100, buy as much $AAVE as you can

21 Sept 2026, 16:09 UTC≈7,730 viewsread 11 November 2026
Photo

$BTC 4h Update So good! 🚀🤑 $BTC is pumping exactly as expected

20 Sept 2026, 17:47 UTC≈6,040 viewsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Buy as much $AAVE as possibe while it's still trading below the 0.236 Fib level The biggest DeFi hub in crypto will pump hard 🚀🚀

11 Sept 2026, 17:18 UTC≈7,520 viewsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Plotted every major Layer 1 by fully diluted valuation against real usage (30-day active daily addresses). They sort into four clean types: 1️⃣ The Blue Chips (ETH, BNB, Solana, Tron) Big valuations backed by millions of daily users. Earned it. 2️⃣ The Ghost Chains (Cardano, Stellar, Sui): Valued in the billions, used by a relative handful. The gap is the whole story. 3️⃣ The Grinders (NEAR, Aptos, Injective): Re…

9 Sept 2026, 11:59 UTC≈5,500 viewsread 11 November 2026
Photo

$ARB was a perfect call 😎 Target Reached! +130% profit gained 💵

8 Sept 2026, 16:36 UTC≈6,220 viewsread 11 November 2026
Photo

$BTC Golden Cross (MA50 & MA200) just confirmed a new Bull Market! 🔥🚀🥳 The Bear Market is officially OVER!!

Showing the 12 most recent of 49 posts we hold for @oliverstrade. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

CryptoBullet
@cryptobullet · 72,424
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 20 August 2026
Klondike (Crypto Rush) ⚠️
@CryptoKlondike · 56,825
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 22 August 2026
Crypto Cove
@CryptoCove · 28,708
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 9 September 2026
100eyes Crypto Scanner
@EyesCryptoScanner · 21,428
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 17 September 2026
Coin Signals
@Coin_Signals · 71,608
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 19 August 2026
The Bull
@thebull_crypto · 170,635
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 12 August 2026
Trade & Grow (Crypto) HWP
@Crypto_HOLDwithPriyank · 30,091
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 9 September 2026
100eyes Crypto Scanner (PREVIEW)
@CryptoScanner100eyes · 30,770
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 6 September 2026
Kim & Crypto
@kimoncrypto · 35,318
Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 31 August 2026
Rocket Wallet Signals
@RocketWallet_Official · 22,554
Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 18 September 2026
Crypto News
@news_crypto · 99,683
Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 16 August 2026
Fat Pig Signals
@fatpigsignals · 41,137
Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 29 August 2026

This channel appears in 12 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Oliver’s Trade” (@oliverstrade), 18,270 subscribers as measured 11 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/oliverstrade.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.