3 measurements spanning 9 days, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 794–796 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
16 Aug 2026, 03:06
794
-2
7 Aug 2026, 10:03
796
no change
7 Aug 2026, 09:56
796
first reading
Engagement
18 posts held, back to 3 October 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 13 March 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
317 reactions across 18 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 53.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
170
53.6%
🔥
81
25.6%
❤
27
8.52%
👌
13
4.10%
❤🔥
9
2.84%
👏
3
0.946%
😍
3
0.946%
😎
3
0.946%
🤔
3
0.946%
🤯
2
0.631%
🏆
1
0.315%
👎
1
0.315%
💯
1
0.315%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 317reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 3 October 2024 to 13 March 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
4
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 18 we hold a reading for · 11%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Kuda_invest. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 18 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 October 2024 to 13 March 2025. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Advertising
Ad load
5.56%
1 of 18 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
1
posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
Median views · ads
856
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
1,260
over 17 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor.A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
erid
Posts
First seen
Last seen
LjN8KQ7vT
1
31 October 2024
31 October 2024
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 3 October 2024 to 13 March 2025. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Друзья, на такой интересной теме как франчайзинг, мы завершаем наш второй сезон подкаста «Куда вложить?»!
➡️Пишите свои впечатления от прослушивания, расскажите какие выпуски этого сезона вам понравились больше всего, а также не забывайте делиться ссылками на любимые выпуски со своими друзьями и знакомыми!
Также будем рады за вашу подписку на наши каналы в телеграм:
✅ Дмитрий Смирнов
✅ Евгения Давыдова
🎙️🎙️🎙️🎙️
В этом выпуске подкаста мы решили рассмотреть реальный опыт открытия бизнеса по франшизе и его пошагового масштабирования!
Мы с гостем пройдем весь путь от одной мысли об открытии собственной пиццерии до нескольких пиццерий сети Додо Пицца в управлении!
Также узнаем о тех "подводных камнях", с которыми можно столкнуться на этом пути и погрузимся в то, как лучше выбирать франчайзинговые проекты для реализа…
🎙️🎙️🎙️🎙️
Почему медицина — одно из самых надежных направлений для инвестиций?
В этом выпуске мы рассмотрим тренды, которые формируют будущее медицины, обсудим, куда стоит вкладывать свои средства, и разберемся какие ниши ждут стремительного роста!
Также особое внимание уделим острым проблемам, стоящим перед медицинским бизнесом сегодня и выясним почему стоит рассмотреть медицину - как одно из направлений своего ин…
🎙️🎙️🎙️🎙️
Открытие собственного бизнеса – мечта многих, но сделать первые шаги без опыта может быть сложно. В нашем подкасте Александр Макаров, опытный предприниматель и владелец успешной франчайзинговой сети «Лаборатория Тест-Драйв», расскажет, как превратить эту мечту в реальность!
Гость поделится с нами секретами, на что следует обратить внимание при выборе своей первой франшизы, и какие сферы наиболее перспектив…
🎙️🎙️🎙️🎙️
В современном мире финансовая независимость – ключ к уверенности и стабильности. В этом выпуске мы обсудим, как женщина может обеспечить себе надёжную финансовую защиту. Рассмотрим различные стратегии накопления капитала; поговорим о том, какие инвестиционные инструменты предпочитают женщины, а какие мужчины.
Также обсудили, как сформировать портфель, который гарантированно сможет оплатить обучение ребенка…
🎙️🎙️🎙️🎙️
Что происходит с фондовым рынком сегодня? Что ждёт инвесторов в ближайшем будущем?
В этом выпуске мы с нашем гостем рассмотрим ключевые вопросы, касающиеся данного направления инвестиций. Также обсудим, стоит ли инвесторам волноваться и куда лучше направить свои средства!
Также из данного выпуска вы сможете узнать о:
- Психологии поведения инвестора на фондовом рынке.
- Влиянии процентных ставок на текущ…
🎙️🎙️🎙️🎙️
Какая на самом деле существует формула успешного инвестирования в малый бизнес? Как на этапах зарождения бизнес-проекта понять стоит ли туда инвестировать? - эти и другие вопросы мы обсудим с нашим гостем в данном выпуске подкаста!
В гостях у нас нетипичный инвестор Андрей Калашников - предприниматель года E&Y 2019, который провёл более 200 стратсессиий в бизнесах от 3 до 5k сотрудников
Прослушать наш нов…
🎙️🎙️🎙️🎙️
"Как сохранить доступ к своим средствам? Какие страны предлагают наиболее выгодные условия для получения второго паспорта?" - об этом и не только вы узнаете из данного выпуска!
Наш гость – Александр Беспалов, основатель международного консалтингового бутика "Bespalov Finance"
А также, прослушав наш новый выпуск вы узнаете, как грамотно подойти к вопросу выбора второй страны для гражданства и какие нюансы …
🎙️🎙️🎙️🎙️
В этом выпуске подкаста мы поговорим о сети городских курортов «Termoland» – местах, где можно сбежать от городской суеты и просто расслабиться! А также:
- Обсудим, как развивается рынок термальных комплексов и какие факторы на это влияют.
- Расскажем, кто чаще всего посещает такие места и какие показатели помогают понять, насколько успешен проект.
- Ну и конечно же, поделимся тем, что интересует инвесто…
🎙️🎙️🎙️🎙️
В нашем новом выпуске подкаста мы заглянули внутрь системы кредитования, узнали как она работает, что с ней происходит в период высокой ключевой ставки.
Также выяснили какие факторы влияют на повышение вероятности одобрения кредитования, и какие конкретные лайфхаки можно применять для получения кредита при текущей ситуации
Гостем данного выпуска стал ипотечный и кредитный брокер Илья Галётов
Выпуск досту…
🎙️🎙️🎙️🎙️
В нашем новом выпуске подкаста мы поговорим об инвестициях в развлечения, отдых и досуг!
Узнаем подводные камни и особенности инвестирования в данное направление, а также поймём сколько на этом можно заработать и как не потерять свои деньги!
В гостях у нас Алексей Просандеев - президент союза ассоциаций и партнёров индустрии развлечений (САПИР).
Также информируем, что 9-11 декабря 2024 года в Москве сост…
👍6🔥4👏3👎1
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @Kuda_invest. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 933,976 of 1,480,975entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@Kuda_invest named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@davydova_advice named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Куда вложить?” (@Kuda_invest), 794 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Kuda_invest.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.