Channel
@tweettism
On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
9,979subscribers
-14 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001285907116 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @tweettism |
| Created | 24 December 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/tweettism |
Memes & entertainment — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 59% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
11,100 average views per post against 9,979 subscribers — an engagement rate of 110.8%. Across the 12,230 registered channels in the same cohort — 3,163–9,999 subscribers, posting mainly in Persian — the middle half sit between 5.62% and 23.1%, with a median of 12.0%.
| Window | 30 days (16 July 2026 – 15 August 2026) |
|---|---|
| Posts measured | 114 of 114 published in the window (77 exact, 37 rounded by Telegram) |
| Views totalled | 1,260,783 |
| Mature posts only | 91.5% over 53 posts read at least 24h after publication |
| Subscribers | 9,979 measured 12 August 2026 |
| Cohort | b3162:fas · 12,230 channels · p10 2.54% · p25 5.62% · p50 12.0% · p75 23.1% · p90 39.5% |
| Position in cohort | 99.068th percentile · 9.2× the cohort median |
| Uncertainty | ±0.032% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding |
| Post language | Persian · 97.3%of the window’s posts |
When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.
This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal.A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.
Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 15 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 19:07 | 9,979 | +1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 11:54 | 9,978 | -15 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 02:49 | 9,993 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 01:48 | 9,993 | first reading |
124 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 18 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 12 of 124 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 124 (4 August 2026 – 15 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,331,608 |
| Reactions total | 10 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 15 Aug 2026, 19:39 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 54 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
8 reactions across 6 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 62.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 5 | 62.5% | |
| 😁 | 2 | 25.0% | |
| 🤣 | 1 | 12.5% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 124 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 10reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 124 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 15 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
جدیدا یه چیزی بین دخترا مد شده که به سینههایی که کوچیک هستن میگن "سینه سلطنتی👑" و منطقشونم اینه که: "ما سینههامون کوچیک نیست، سلطنتیه؛ دلیلشم اینه که اجداد ما چون از طبقه اجتماعی خیلی بالایی بودن، خودشون به بچههاشون شیر نمیدادن و برای بچههاشون دایه (سرپرست) میگرفتن. برای همین تو ژنتیک ما، سینههامون این سایزیه که بهش میگن سینه سلطنتی." @tweettism
پسرا حواستون باشه، هوش مصنوعی جدیدا این شکلی مخ دخترا رو میزنه و قربون صدقهشون میره، در حدی که کراش همه دخترا شده. @tweettism
این بازی خیلی این روزا ترند😍 راحت میتونی پولت چند برابر کنی💖 فرصت از دست ندین فیلم بازی نگاه کنید و شروع کنید😁💵
🌟 ویدئو بازی محبوب Chicky choice🌟 فقط کافیه مرغ از خیابون رد کنی و پولت افزایش بدی😍💵 💖توی سایت بت اینجا بازی کن و پیش بینی کن و پول در بیار😍 ⬅️امکان شارژ با کارت بانکی راحت و امن ⬅️تسویه حساب سریع بدون احراز 🎁هربار شارژ کنی 12% بیشتر شارژ میشی✅ 🎁اگ باختی هم 10% باختت سایت بهت برگشت میده✅ 🚨ادرس ورود به سایت: 💠http://betinja.bet/affiliates/?btag=2760677 💖فیلترشکن خود را روشن کنید و روی کشور مناسب قرار دهید مانند ال…
این زن و شوهر بعد ۶۰ سال زندگی مشترک اینجوری باهم رفتن برای خانومش کارای زیبایی انجام بدن. @tweettism
مامان راست میگه هیچکاری نمیکنن:))) این مرغ عشقه یا بکن درو؟ کسکش کرد فرار کرد. نمیدونم کدوم کسخلی این اسمو برا اینا گذاشته. مرغِ چه عشقی؟ البته شایدم تعریف عشق همینه. عشق میکنن میرن. طرفو درگیر احساسات نمیکنن. @tweettism
اصن کاری به هیچی ندارم، این چجوری اینقدر نووه؟ @tweettism
وقتی خانوادت اومدن استادیوم که مسابقتو ببینن. @tweettism
✅اپلیکیشن حرفه ای اندروید سایت بین المللی دربی بت ✅اسپانسر لیگ انگلستان 💰 با امکان شارژ و برداشت با کارت بانکی ◻️ برای ورود فیلترشکن روشن کرده روی کانادا یا سنگاپور یا آلمان و ....📢 😀Telegram Channel👇 https://t.me/+AAciQTsLWOQ5N2Fk
😤میخوای مسابقات فوتبال پیش بینی کنی؟! 🥇پس نیاز داری به یه سایت بین المللی و معتبر🥇 ⛔دربی بت همون انتخاب 100% 💎ویژگی های سایت جهانی Derby Bet: ⬅️امکان شارژ امن با کارت بانکی ⬅️واریز اول دوبل شارژ می شوید(بونوس۱۰۰٪) ⬅️پر اپشن ترین سایت فعال در ایران ⬅️تسویه حساب کمتر از 5 دقیقه ⬅️برگشت بخشی از باخت به صورت هفتگی ⭐دارای لایسنس و مجوز anjuan 🚨کد هدیه ثبت نام:GG007 ⚠️برای دانلود اپلکیشن کلیک کنید👉 🔔کانال دربی بت :👇 …
لیگ های معتبر اروپایی شروع شد وقتشه یه پول خوب بزنی به جیب و فقط بیننده فوتبال نباشی ازش پول دربیاری💵😍
✅توم میخوای از مسابقات فوتبال پول دربیاری؟🏆🥇🏆 ✅کانال ورسوس بت کارش تحلیل و پیش بینی مسابقات فوتبال به صورت حرفه ای💎 ⚠️توم میتونی از پیش بینی فوتبال لیگ های اروپایی خیلی راحت پول دربیاری فقط کافیه با کانال ورسوس بت همراه شی📣 💌روزانه بین 10 الی 100میلیون کسب درامد کن و پولت چند برابر کن✅ A23 🌐ادرس عضویت کانالشون:👇 📌https://t.me/+dMmpUAIT7NAyZTFk 📌https://t.me/+dMmpUAIT7NAyZTFk
Showing the 12 most recent of 124 posts we hold for @tweettism. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 10,236 of 1,480,740entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“توییتیسم” (@tweettism), 9,979 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tweettism.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.