Gaming — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
34 measurements spanning 43 days, net +119. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 21,344–21,513 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 34
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
18 Sept 2026, 11:55
21,482
-10
16 Sept 2026, 07:57
21,492
-1
14 Sept 2026, 14:41
21,493
+4
13 Sept 2026, 02:19
21,489
+1
11 Sept 2026, 05:57
21,488
+15
8 Sept 2026, 10:37
21,473
+21
5 Sept 2026, 07:42
21,452
+5
3 Sept 2026, 08:37
21,447
-10
2 Sept 2026, 01:03
21,457
+24
1 Sept 2026, 03:06
21,433
+1
31 Aug 2026, 05:46
21,432
+4
30 Aug 2026, 09:07
21,428
-2
29 Aug 2026, 07:43
21,430
+15
28 Aug 2026, 07:35
21,415
-5
27 Aug 2026, 09:04
21,420
-15
26 Aug 2026, 06:32
21,435
-3
25 Aug 2026, 03:41
21,438
+8
23 Aug 2026, 18:47
21,430
-7
22 Aug 2026, 05:36
21,437
+13
20 Aug 2026, 18:49
21,424
first reading
Engagement
130 posts held, back to 28 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 63 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
9.54%
avg views ÷ 21,482 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,050
39 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.10%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
39
of 130 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 September 2026
Posts held
130 (28 July 2026 – 29 September 2026)
Views total
79,938
Reactions total
880
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
29 Sept 2026, 17:43 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈8,480
Videos
≈3,450
Links
≈4,570
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 29 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
36m 53s
Average length
1m 11s
Measured directly from 31 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
3,174 reactions across 129 posts, in 45 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
859
27.1%
🔥
455
14.3%
🤣
422
13.3%
❤🔥
396
12.5%
👍
147
4.63%
😐
132
4.16%
🤩
109
3.43%
👎
79
2.49%
🎉
70
2.21%
🤮
65
2.05%
😁
62
1.95%
💩
39
1.23%
🗿
37
1.17%
😭
32
1.01%
🥰
32
1.01%
🦄
29
0.914%
🤓
28
0.882%
🖕
27
0.851%
🤬
27
0.851%
🍓
26
0.819%
25 further kinds
101
3.18%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 130 of the 130 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,174 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 130 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 29 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 130 we hold a reading for · 0.8%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @IRANR6S. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 130 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 28 July 2026 to 29 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
🌟هاتفیکس جدید برای امروز
📌این آپدیت برای مشکلات درج شده است:
😀 مشکلات Performance در PS5 Pro
😀 مشکل باندل Rainbow Black Ice و آیتمهای ناقص آن
😀 مشکل تأخیر در شروع شدن مچها
⬅️ طبق زمان اعلامشده، سرورها از ساعت ۱۶:۳۰ به وقت ایران برای حدود ۶۰ دقیقه از دسترس خارج میشوند و مثل همیشه بازی از ساعت ۱۷:۳۰ دوباره پایدار و در دسترس خواهد بود.🎩
📱@IRANR6S
📱@IRANR6SGP
🌟حدس درباره سورپرایز توسعهدهندگان در Y11S4
🔻جاشوا میلز اعلام کرده که یوبیسافت برای سیزن چهارم سال یازدهم، سورپرایزهایی دارد که هنوز معرفی نشدهاند.
🔸بعداً لیکر ،Shiny با اشارهای گفت که بازیکنان ظاهراً حدس زدهاند این سورپرایزها چه هستند، اما کمی بعد کامنت خود را حذف کرد.
🔹 موارد تأییدشده / از قبل اعلامشده
🟢 سلاح جدید برای Doc
🟢 معرفی نسخه جدید Hereford Base
🟢 بازگشت مود Secure Area یا Hostage به رنک
🔹حدسها…
🌟 ریکالر MEMENTO برای AK-12 به فروشگاه رینبوسیکس اضافه شد
😀این اسکین با ۳۰٪ تخفیف در فروشگاه قرار گرفته است.
🔅قیمت:
😀 ۲۸۷۰ کردیت بدون بتل پس
😀 ۲۵۸۳ کردیت با بتل پس
😏 جالب است بدانید که این اسکین پیشتر نیز، مانند حالا، با شانس بسیار پایین ۰٫۰۰۰۶۶۷٪ از پکهای Delta قابل دریافت بود.
😠 نکته جالبتر این است که در گذشته، شانس دریافت اسکینهای Memento از پکها ۰٫۰۰۱٪ بوده است.
🔻این اسکین تا ۱۰ مهر ۱۴۰۵ ساعت ۱۷:۳۰ ب…
🌟 یوبیسافت برای زمان انتشار GTA 6 سورپرایزهایی آماده کرده است🧠
🔹جاشوا میلز، مدیر مثلا خلاق Rainbow Six Siege، انتظار دارد که پس از انتشار GTA 6، بخشی از بازیکنان برای مدتی به بازی جدید Rockstar روی بیاورند.😄
🔹 به گفته او، این موضوع بازیهای تمام سبکها را تحت تأثیر قرار میدهد، اما بازیکنان بهمرور به بازیهای قبلی خود بازخواهند گشت.
🔻 میلز اعلام کرد که تیم توسعه با بازیکنانی که در رینبوسیکس باقی میمانند، «م…
🌟و همچنان دیگر باندلها و آیتمهای جدیدی که به فروشگاه اضافه شدهاند
⬅️باندل Carnevale (Y3S2):
😀 ۱۲۰۰ کردیت بدون بتل پس
😀 ۱۰۸۰ کردیت با بتل پس
⬅️باندل Plinky’s Arcade (Y2S3):
😀 ۱۹۲۰ کردیت بدون بتل پس
😀 ۱۷۲۸ کردیت با بتل پس
⬅️باندل یونیفرمهای الیت Buck1️⃣ و Thunderbird6️⃣ با تخفیف ۱۰٪ :
😀 ۳۲۴۰ کردیت بدون بتل پس
😀 ۲۹۱۶ کردیت با بتل پس
⬅️ باندل سلاح L85A2:
شامل اسکینهای زیر است:
😀 اسکین Cranking-up: جایزه چلنج Dua…
🌟همچنین اسکینهای Memento اکنون بهصورت جداگانه قابل خرید هستند
📌از Y11S3، بازیکنان میتوانند اسکینهای Memento را بدون نیاز به خرید کلکسیون پکهای ایونت خریداری کنند.
⬅️ باندل Memento همچنین شامل ۵ پک از ایونت است.
😀 کلکسیونهای جدید ایونت از این پس فقط با کردیت قابل خرید هستند. در صورت بازگشت کلکسیونهای قدیمی به فروشگاه، امکان خرید آنها با کردیت و Renown نیز وجود خواهد داشت.
🔅قیمت باندل Memento:
😀 ۴۱۰۰ کردیت…
🌟تمام اطلاعات مربوط به ایونت WASTELAND CIRCUIT
📌 این ایونت شامل ۳۳ پک است و ستهای اختصاصی اپراتورهای Brava، IQ، Mozzie و Twitch را در اختیار بازیکنان قرار میدهد.
🔅 قیمت باندلها و پکها:
⬅️ باندل Memento:
😀 ۴۱۰۰ کردیت بدون بتل پس
😀 ۳۶۹۰ کردیت با بتل پس
⬅️ باندل Pit Lane:
😀 ۱۲۰۰ کردیت بدون بتل پس
😀 ۱۰۸۰ کردیت با بتل پس
⬅️ باندل Severe Trials:
😀 ۱۶۸۰ کردیت بدون بتل پس
😀 ۱۵۱۲ کردیت با بتل پس
⬅️ باندلهای …
🌟مأموریتهای هفته اول WASTELAND CIRCUIT فعال شدند
🔹مأموریتهای هفته اول ایونت:
😀 مأموریت اول: در ۵ مسابقه، در جمع ۳ نفر برتر قرار بگیرید.
😀 مأموریت دوم: تعداد ۲۵ عدد Ability Orb جمعآوری کنید.
⭐️ و همچنین یک هدیه در بخش هایلایت هادر دسترس قرار گرفته است.
📌ناگفته نماند که تمام دارندگان R6 Membership یک پک پاداش دریافت کردهاند.
📱@IRANR6S
📱@IRANR6SGP
🌟اطلاعیههای جدید توسعهدهندگان پس از انتشار پچ
📌 باندل RAINBOW BLACK ICE
⬅️ باندل Rainbow Black Ice تا زمان برطرفشدن مشکل فنی، بهطور موقت از فروشگاه حذف شده است.
😀 بازیکنانی که این باندل را خریداری کردهاند، در حال حاضر فقط دو اسکین از چهار اسکین آن را مشاهده میکنند.
😀 اسکینهای باقیمانده پس از بازگشت باندل به فروشگاه در ۷ مهر ۱۴۰۵ (۲۹ سپتامبر) قابل استفاده خواهند بود.
📌 حالت Performance در PS5 Pro
⬅️ تو…
🎉15❤4😁3❤🔥2🤩1
Signed Navid
Showing the 12 most recent of 130 posts we hold for @IRANR6S. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 23 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
GameKey98 | گیم کی ۹۸ @game_key98 · 33,467 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 47 here — alongside 46 others — read 26 September 2026
Fortnite Br | فورتنایت بی آر @Fortnite_Br · 37,074 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 36 here — alongside 35 others — read 1 September 2026
WARZONE IRAN @warzoneirancom · 31,193 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 44 here — alongside 43 others — read 6 September 2026
Shelter DNS | شلتر @sheltertm · 256,443 Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 43 here — alongside 42 others — read 11 August 2026
J o z v e @Qiau_jozve · 26,402 Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 12 September 2026
WTIAU CHANNEL تهران غرب @wtiau_3 · 26,900 Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 11 September 2026
WTIAU | تهران غرب @wtiau_ac · 30,282 Telegram ranks this channel #80 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 7 September 2026
کانال استادیابی دانشگاه آزاد @Ostadyabi_tnb · 40,798 Telegram ranks this channel #84 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 30 August 2026
This channel appears in 8 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“IRAN R6 | ایران آر سیکس” (@IRANR6S), 21,482 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/IRANR6S.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.