Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Overwatch

@Overwatch

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Cite this entry

3,988subscribers

+25 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001055223275
TypeChannel
Username@Overwatch
Created13 May 2016measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Overwatch

Growth

3,9613,9883,974.55 August 2026 — 3,963 subscribers6 August 2026 — 3,963 subscribers6 August 2026 — 3,964 subscribers9 August 2026 — 3,961 subscribers11 August 2026 — 3,973 subscribers15 August 2026 — 3,988 subscribers5 August 202615 August 2026
6 measurements spanning 9 days, net +25. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,957–3,992 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 01:283,988+15
11 Aug 2026, 23:213,973+12
9 Aug 2026, 06:463,961-3
6 Aug 2026, 14:523,964+1
6 Aug 2026, 04:203,963no change
5 Aug 2026, 23:493,963first reading

Engagement

36 posts held, back to 27 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 4 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
24.7%
avg views ÷ 3,988 subscribers
Avg views / post
984
36 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.13%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
36
of 36 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 33 of 36 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026
Posts held36 (27 July 20268 August 2026)
Views total35,417
Reactions total366
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 05:46 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
33s
Average length
6s

Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

237 reactions across 19 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 22.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🍓5322.4%
🔥5121.5%
❤‍🔥4519.0%
4016.9%
🥰2611.0%
💔72.95%
🤩62.53%
👀41.69%
👍20.844%
😭20.844%
🎄10.422%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 33 of the 36 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 366reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 36 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

8 Aug 2026, 03:19 UTC236 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

خانم Lily Ki بعد از انتخاب شدنش به عنوان صداپیشه دیمون، تمامی برنامه های خود را لغو کرده است تا اکثر‌ وقت خود را صرف صداگذاری دیمون کند @Overwatch

🍓9

Signed arizona

8 Aug 2026, 03:06 UTC254 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

ممکن است شاهد هیرو های مک/Mech دار بیشتری باشیم از تیم اووراچ Gavin Winter گفته است: تکنولوژی مک و ری مک رو درکل از پایه برنامه نویسی و درمجموع از پیچیدگی آن کم کردیم. ما در آینده برای هیرو های مشابه با زحمت کمتری مواجه خواهیم بود ایشان درنهایت شفاف سازی نکردند که هیرو های بیشتری از مکا اسکواد منتشر میشود یا نه @Overwatch

🥰9

Signed arizona

7 Aug 2026, 18:18 UTC619 views14 reactionsread 8 August 2026

اسم یک هیرو رو کامنت بدین تا در قرعه کشی این دراپ + ۵ لوت باکس Esports شرکت کنین برای شرکت: ۱- داخل این چنل عضو باشین ۲- فقط اسم یک هیرو رو به فارسی یا انگلیسی بگین و هیچ حرف دیگه ای نزنین در هفته اخیر نباید اکانت توییچ به اکانت لینک کرده باشین، همینطور نباید این دراپ هارو درگرفته باشین وگرنه دراپ جدیدی به اکانت تون اضافه نمیشه فرصت شرکت وقتی به کامنت ۶۷ برسه برنده بزودی مشخص میشه🫶🏼 @Overwatch

8💔4❤‍🔥2

Signed arizona

7 Aug 2026, 17:25 UTC682 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

نگاهی به انیمیشن Call Mech دیمون @Overwatch

🔥4😭2

Signed arizona

7 Aug 2026, 17:23 UTC680 views0 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

هیرو پرتره سه بعدی دیمون در داخل بازی همچنین تایید شد این هیرو درمجموع در حالت مک، 600 HP دارد @Overwatch

Signed arizona

7 Aug 2026, 16:31 UTC794 views12 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

کیت ابلیتی + پرک های دیمان منتشر شد ترجمه تا دقایقی دیگه به پست اضافه میشه @Overwatch

❤‍🔥12

Signed arizona

7 Aug 2026, 16:03 UTC841 views13 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

اولین تریلر گیمپلی دیمون منتشر شد @Overwatch

🔥13

Signed arizona

7 Aug 2026, 11:09 UTC837 views16 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

کانسپت آرت رسمی دیمون گیمپلی این هیرو امشب منتشر میشود @Overwatch

🍓131🎄1💔1

Signed arizona

7 Aug 2026, 08:18 UTC807 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

لانچ تریلر S4: Heroes of Busan در 10 آگست ساعت 21:30 منتشر میشود @Overwatch

Signed arizona

7 Aug 2026, 08:16 UTC818 views23 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

D.Va Met D.Mon @Overwatch

🍓17🥰4💔2

Signed arizona

6 Aug 2026, 18:31 UTC841 viewsread 8 August 2026
Video

بلیزارد منتشر کرد - داستان Growing Pains با محوریت دیمون در این ویدیو، داستان توسط صداپیشه دیمون روایت شده است @Overwatch

Signed arizona

6 Aug 2026, 18:10 UTC826 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

توییچ دراپ جدید تا 11 آگست / x500 کامپ پوینت هر دو ساعت تماشا = x100 کامپ پوینت @Overwatch

1

Signed arizona

Showing the 12 most recent of 36 posts we hold for @Overwatch. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@Overwatch edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
8 August 2026
Most recent edit
8 August 2026

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,214,693 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Overwatch” (@Overwatch), 3,988 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Overwatch.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.