این باگ نیست البته بخاطر کانفیگ گرافیکیه که بعضیا زدن تا برای گرفتن بیشترین فریم اینجوری رندرینگ و ویژوالیتی بازی رو خراب کنن خلاصه با فایل کانفیگ زیاد ور نرید
❤5👍2
Signed S A E R

Channel
@warzoneirancom
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
30,447subscribers
+382 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001170128345 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @warzoneirancom |
| Description | • وارزون ایران بزرگترین مرجع کالاف در ایران • • گروه وارزون ایران @warzoneirangap • شاپ باندل بتل پس @warzon_iranshop • شاپ خرید فروش اکانت وارزون @warzoneiran_account 🏆چنل رضایت شاپ ها : @trust_wzir |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 22 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 16 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 22 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/warzoneirancom |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 22 Aug 2026, 06:05 | 30,447 | +112 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 18:26 | 30,335 | +14 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 20:03 | 30,321 | +26 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 19:22 | 30,295 | +40 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 16:04 | 30,255 | +6 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 06:26 | 30,249 | +26 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 17:35 | 30,223 | +19 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 11:23 | 30,204 | +43 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 10:48 | 30,161 | +19 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 11:42 | 30,142 | -9 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 11:14 | 30,151 | +1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 08:32 | 30,150 | +53 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 10:54 | 30,097 | +31 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:05 | 30,066 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:30 | 30,065 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:20 | 30,065 | first reading |
337 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 34 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 326 of 336 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 22 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 337 (6 August 2026 – 22 August 2026) |
| Views total | 706,122 |
| Reactions total | 8,093 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 22 Aug 2026, 17:52 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 22 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 64 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
8,093 reactions across 321 posts, in 24 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 3,259 | 40.3% | |
| 👍 | 1,513 | 18.7% | |
| 🔥 | 982 | 12.1% | |
| ❤🔥 | 690 | 8.53% | |
| 🫡 | 308 | 3.81% | |
| 🤯 | 255 | 3.15% | |
| 😨 | 183 | 2.26% | |
| 😎 | 148 | 1.83% | |
| 💔 | 112 | 1.38% | |
| 💅 | 96 | 1.19% | |
| 🐳 | 89 | 1.10% | |
| 🤩 | 84 | 1.04% | |
| 👀 | 82 | 1.01% | |
| 🕊 | 77 | 0.951% | |
| ☃ | 62 | 0.766% | |
| 🥰 | 51 | 0.63% | |
| 😈 | 32 | 0.395% | |
| 👨💻 | 22 | 0.272% | |
| 🤝 | 15 | 0.185% | |
| 💋 | 11 | 0.136% | |
| 4 further kinds | 22 | 0.272% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 326 of the 337 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 8,093reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 337 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 22 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
این باگ نیست البته بخاطر کانفیگ گرافیکیه که بعضیا زدن تا برای گرفتن بیشترین فریم اینجوری رندرینگ و ویژوالیتی بازی رو خراب کنن خلاصه با فایل کانفیگ زیاد ور نرید
❤5👍2
Signed S A E R
دوستان راجب پرایس شیره خور پرسیده بودید ابن مشکل رندرینگ بازی برای بتا هست اینطوری میشه , انشلا که تا لانچ بازی درستش کنن WZIR 🌱
👍14😨3☃1💅1
Signed Darcy
دوستان یک سری گزارش داریم میگن که وقتی توی بتای مدرن وارفیر 4 به لول 20 برسید داخل وارزون/ بلک اپس 7 براتون بتل پس فعال میشه !! و این مورد هم خیلی خیلی زیاد داره گزارش میشه هم پیوی بنده هم توی توییتر نمیدونم باگه یا واقعا اینفینیتی وارد تصمیم گرفته که بتل پس بده
🤩23😨5❤2
Signed 𝑯𝒂𝒓𝒓𝒚
جدیداً میبینم میگن وارزون ایران بلک اپس هفت هم میگفت شاهکار و میان در مورد پست های مدرن جدید هیت میدن که دارید هایپ میکنید : / برادر من اول پست ریپلای شده رو ببین وارزون ایران از همون اول گارد داشت به Bo7 دوستان ما هیچی نمیگیم خودتون بگید بتا خوب بوده یا نه WZIR 🌱
👍30💔1
Signed Darcy
🛠آپدیت لایو شد آپدیت درون برنامه ای هست #ModernWarfare4 #MW4 #MW4Openbeta #InfinityWard 🟡 𝐉𝐎𝐈𝐍 𝐔𝐒 @warzoneirancom 🟡 𝐉𝐎𝐈𝐍 𝐆𝐏 @warzoneirangap 🟡 𝐉𝐎𝐈𝐍 𝐒𝐇𝐎𝐏 @warzon_iranshop
❤8
Signed S A E R
مپ جدید Cachette که با آپدیت امشب به بتای Modern Warfare 4 اضافه خواهد شد #ModernWarfare4 #MW4 #MW4Openbeta #InfinityWard 🟡 𝐉𝐎𝐈𝐍 𝐔𝐒 @warzoneirancom 🟡 𝐉𝐎𝐈𝐍 𝐆𝐏 @warzoneirangap 🟡 𝐉𝐎𝐈𝐍 𝐒𝐇𝐎𝐏 @warzon_iranshop
❤7👍1
Signed S A E R
🔰 پچنوت جدید بتای MW4 منتشر شد! • استیدیو Infinity Ward با انتشار آپدیت جدید، تغییرات و محتوای تازهای را به بتای Modern Warfare 4 اضافه کرد ▫️| محتوای جدید: • اضافه شدن نقشه Cachette • اضافه شدن مود جدید Inflation • اضافه شدن قابلیت Map Voting برای انتخاب نقشه بعدی • امکان Reroll کردن Daily Challenge ▫️| تغییرات بصری: • بهبود نورپردازی و رنگبندی نقشه Transit 213 ▫️| تغییرات سلاحها و اتچمنتها: •نرف شد ISO Nig…
❤🔥12❤3👍1👨💻1
Signed 𝑯𝒂𝒓𝒓𝒚
Call of Duty Modern Warfare 4 weapon inspection • توجه به جزئیات ستودنیه 🟡𝐉𝐎𝐈𝐍 𝐔𝐒 @warzoneirancom 🟡𝐉𝐎𝐈𝐍 𝐆𝐏 @warzoneirangap 🟡𝐉𝐎𝐈𝐍 𝐒𝐇𝐎𝐏 @warzon_iranshop
🫡13💅2❤1🔥1
Signed Darcy
با لینک کردن اکانت دیسکورد خود به اکتیویژن این culling card رایگان زیبا را برای MW4 دریافت میکنید 🟡𝐉𝐎𝐈𝐍 𝐔𝐒 @warzoneirancom 🟡𝐉𝐎𝐈𝐍 𝐆𝐏 @warzoneirangap 🟡𝐉𝐎𝐈𝐍 𝐒𝐇𝐎𝐏 @warzon_iranshop
❤19🤯4
Signed Majid
کمپین هم که اصلا نیازی به نقد و برسی نداشت ، کسایی که پلی دادن خودشون میدانند که چه دیدند 🟡𝐉𝐎𝐈𝐍 𝐔𝐒 @warzoneirancom 🟡𝐉𝐎𝐈𝐍 𝐆𝐏 @warzoneirangap 🟡𝐉𝐎𝐈𝐍 𝐒𝐇𝐎𝐏 @warzon_iranshop
❤31
Signed 𝑯𝒂𝒓𝒓𝒚
🔶 انجین / کیفیت / گرافیک/ بهینه سازی ▫️| پخته ترین و بهترین گرافیک کاد ، با وجود اضافه شدن ری تریسینگ اجباری ، فریم ریت ثبات خودش رو کاملا حفظ کرده ، خیلی ها میگن چرا برای ما خمیری هست ، چرا برای ما مثل شما نیست ، تنظیمات شما چیه و..... ، حتما داخل تنظیمات اگر DLSS یا DLAA و موارد دیگه ای مثل FSR روشن هست رو خاموش کنید ، تنظیمات دیگه ای مثل داینامیک رزولوشن باید خاموش باشه ، چک بکنید حتما روی رزولوشن نیتیو مانیتور …
❤13👍2
Signed 𝑯𝒂𝒓𝒓𝒚
🔶 لودات / matchmaking / UI / Server ▫️| زیبا ترین UI کل سری ریبوت کاد ، شیک ، جمع و جور ، گلس بلوری ، سبک مدرن اوجی ، بدون نوتیف یا بنر اضافه برای اذیت کردن پلیر ، چیزی که از مدرن 2 تا بلک اپس 7 کاملا اذیت میکرد ، بدون سنگینی اضافه یا چیز های افکت نما ، کاملا مهندسی شده ▫️| سرور های بتا محدود به EU و US هست ، و میدل ایست لحاظ نشده ، دلیل این اتفاق هم فقط بخاطر بتا بودن بازی هست و جنگ اخیر ، طی اعلامیه قبلی اکتیویژن…
👍8❤3
Signed 𝑯𝒂𝒓𝒓𝒚
Showing the 12 most recent of 337 posts we hold for @warzoneirancom. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
بچهها از توییتر استفاده میکنید ؟
The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 337 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 22 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 613,755 of 1,584,142entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“WARZONE IRAN” (@warzoneirancom), 30,447 subscribers as measured 22 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/warzoneirancom.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.