Ilse Aigner will nicht zu uns kommen. Das ist ihre Entscheidung. Die Frage ist: wird sie der Linksfraktion um Ferat Kocak, Cansin Köktürk und den Parteikollegen von Vanessa Emde und Ahmed Abed ihre Aufwartung machen?
😁213💯82🤣35👍9🙈9🙏9🤯8❤1

Channel
@BeatrixvStorch
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cross-platform identity · Cite this entry
14,683subscribers
+163 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001204163963 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @BeatrixvStorch |
| Description | Mein offizieller Telegram-Kanal. Hier bekommen Sie die Informationen über meine Arbeit direkt und ohne Umwege oder Zensur auf Ihr Handy. |
| Created | 20 November 2019 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 61 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 9 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/BeatrixvStorch |
Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Nov 2026, 19:58 | 14,683 | -7 |
| 8 Nov 2026, 12:01 | 14,690 | +10 |
| 7 Nov 2026, 03:49 | 14,680 | -4 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 06:57 | 14,684 | +7 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 09:46 | 14,677 | +5 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 06:17 | 14,672 | -6 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 06:41 | 14,678 | +4 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 03:11 | 14,674 | -4 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 05:10 | 14,678 | -4 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 02:55 | 14,682 | +7 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 00:45 | 14,675 | -6 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 00:41 | 14,681 | +3 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 20:07 | 14,678 | +2 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 19:07 | 14,676 | -2 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 19:21 | 14,678 | -9 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 19:07 | 14,687 | +1 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 20:40 | 14,686 | -1 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 00:06 | 14,687 | +4 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 00:14 | 14,683 | -2 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 18:01 | 14,685 | first reading |
65 posts held, back to 1 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 67 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 65 (1 August 2026 – 10 November 2026) |
| Views total | 324,680 |
| Reactions total | 10,353 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 10 Nov 2026, 18:18 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 18 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
31,498 reactions across 64 posts, in 23 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 14,586 | 46.3% | |
| ❤ | 4,984 | 15.8% | |
| 💯 | 4,650 | 14.8% | |
| 👏 | 1,671 | 5.31% | |
| 🙏 | 1,472 | 4.67% | |
| 🤬 | 1,457 | 4.63% | |
| 🤣 | 990 | 3.14% | |
| 😁 | 727 | 2.31% | |
| 🔥 | 240 | 0.762% | |
| 🙈 | 183 | 0.581% | |
| 🤔 | 95 | 0.302% | |
| 👎 | 77 | 0.244% | |
| 🎉 | 76 | 0.241% | |
| 🤯 | 68 | 0.216% | |
| 😱 | 48 | 0.152% | |
| 😢 | 42 | 0.133% | |
| 🥰 | 38 | 0.121% | |
| 👌 | 36 | 0.114% | |
| 🥴 | 30 | 0.095% | |
| 😎 | 15 | 0.048% | |
| 3 further kinds | 13 | 0.041% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 65 of the 65 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 32,254 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 65 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 10 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 3 of 23 posts held from the last 30 days (13.0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Ilse Aigner will nicht zu uns kommen. Das ist ihre Entscheidung. Die Frage ist: wird sie der Linksfraktion um Ferat Kocak, Cansin Köktürk und den Parteikollegen von Vanessa Emde und Ahmed Abed ihre Aufwartung machen?
😁213💯82🤣35👍9🙈9🙏9🤯8❤1
Im Mainstream werdet Ihr das hier nicht erfahren: https://www.freiewelt.net/artikel/redaktion/politik/minister-kierwinski-rudert-nach-aussagen-zu-krakau-attentaeter-zurueck/45866
👍236🙏27💯20👏4❤2
Ich stelle fest: Wenn jemand die Einheitsflagge vor dem Reichstag abschneidet und auf 30 Meter Höhe die Pali-Fahne hisst, schaut die Polizei ewig zu. Aber als ich die Deutschlandfahne aus dem Fenster eines Büros im Bundestag geschwenkt habe, da waren die sofort vor zur Stelle und wollten das verbieten. Was zum Teufel ist in unserem Land los?
💯542❤63👍58🤔12🥰9🙏8👌6😁5
Posted without readable text
💯475👍73🤣26🤯8❤5🎉5👎4😢4
Wie zur Hölle ist es möglich, dass diese Pali-Dullis ihre Fahne vor den Reichstag hängen können, ohne dass die Polizei einschreitet? Hat die geschlafen? Inkompetenz? Oder ist das vorauseilender Gehorsam gegenüber den Pali-Sympathisanten im kommenden linksradikalen Berliner Senat?
🤬446💯116🙈41👍15🔥11🤔10🤯7❤6
Besuchergruppe aus Bayern von Andreas Mayer. Lieblingstermin. 😉🤗💙
👍209❤53🥰8🙏5👎1👏1🔥1😱1
Sie gehen über Leichen! 5 Minuten, die die Republik verändern müssten: Neonazi-Szene, NSU und der sog. „Verfassungschutz“.
👍327👏64💯30❤14👌5🔥5🙏3🤯2
Beeindruckende Veranstaltung zum Thema Christenverfolgung in Pakistan mit zwei sehr unterschiedlichen Perspektiven auf das Land durch einen Missionar aus dem Land und einen geflüchteten Christen. Hochinteressant. Mit Dr. Rainer Rothfuß, Dr. Malte Kaufmann, Nicole Höchst. Prädikat: besonders wertvoll.
👍236❤57🙏26🔥4
In den USA ist es nicht die Ausnahme, sondern die Regel, dass die Präsidentenpartei die Midterms verliert. Das war auch bei Obama so. Unterschiedliche Mehrheiten sind in der Gewaltenteilung angelegt. Das Ergebnis straft alle Lügen, die behauptet haben, Trump sei ein Autokrat und das Ende der Demokratie.
👍285💯73🙏13😎9👏6🙈6❤5👎4
Heute (die durchaus auch) feierliche Eröffnung unseres neuen Studios im Bundestag: von hier aus senden wir fortan unsere Botschaft in die Welt hinaus. 🔵💙🔵 Deutschland wird blau 🔵
👏356👍94❤48🙏8🎉5🔥4❤🔥3🤬1
Neuer Bundespräsident: Bevor wir überhaupt wissen, wer es wird, wissen wir schon, dass es eine Frau sein soll. Das ist das Paradox des Gender-Gaga: Auf der einen Seite soll es kein biologisches Geschlecht geben, auf der anderen Seite ist genau dieses biologische Geschlecht das wichtigste Kriterium, wichtiger als Qualifikation und alles andere. Wir leben in einer Gaga-Republik.
💯527👍70🙏16❤13🙈9👏8😁6🤔3
Alles, was Sie zu den Linken wissen müssen. Und was Sie nur glauben, wenn Sie es sehen. Bitte schön. Film ab:
👍319❤34💯31👏16🙏5👎2🔥2
Showing the 12 most recent of 65 posts we hold for @BeatrixvStorch. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republished by 54 registered channels. The 48 listed are the ones that have forwarded the most posts; the rest are counted here but not each listed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@BeatrixvStorch named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 17 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A Wikidata item names this Telegram handle as belonging to the entity it describes. This is Wikidata’s claim, not a verification made by this register — nobody here confirmed that the account is genuinely operated by the entity named. Wikidata content is CC0; every fact below is dated to when it was read from Wikidata, not to when the association was first made there.
| Label | Beatrix von Storch |
|---|---|
| Description | German politician |
| X / Twitter | @Beatrix_vStorch |
| YouTube | UCvXq_RlnDRLatFpiWbc4hyA |
| Official site | https://beatrixvonstorch.de/ |
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Beatrix von Storch” (@BeatrixvStorch), 14,683 subscribers as measured 9 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/BeatrixvStorch.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.