Channel
@mavahedi
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
332subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002246937439 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @mavahedi |
| Description | Based in Toronto, Canada. I share quotations and random things of interest here. |
| Created | Between 1 May 2024 and 31 October 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/mavahedi |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 06:30 | 332 | no change |
| 10 Aug 2026, 06:16 | 332 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 12 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (4 August 2026 – 9 August 2026) |
| Views total | 2,772 |
| Reactions total | 38 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 10 Aug 2026, 06:30 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
38 reactions across 11 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 26.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 10 | 26.3% | |
| 💯 | 9 | 23.7% | |
| 👍 | 7 | 18.4% | |
| 🤣 | 4 | 10.5% | |
| 🤡 | 3 | 7.89% | |
| 👎 | 2 | 5.26% | |
| 😁 | 2 | 5.26% | |
| 🤮 | 1 | 2.63% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 38reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Ibn Taymiyyah observes that Heraclius and al-Najashi recognized the truth of Islam and the Prophethood of the Messenger of Allah 'alayhi al-Salam through distinct approaches. Al-Najashi’s recognition was grounded primarily in the message of the Qur’an and the moral and spiritual values it conveyed. Through reflection upon its teachings, he came to the conviction that the one who brought this message could only be a …
❤3👍1
#الفائدة :(733) (فَوَائدُ مِنْ مَجَالسِ شَيْخِنَا أَبِي عَبْدِاللهِ فَتْحِي المَوْصِلْيّ حَفِظَهُ اللهُ). مقدمات علمية : حديثيّة وأصوليّة في تحسين الحديث بتعدد طرقه *المقدمة الأولى* : الحكم على الخبر بالصحة والقبول إنما يكون بحسب أمرين : بحسب صفات ناقليه ، وبحسب تعدد طرقه ؛ وبالتالي القول بعدم التصحيح أو التحسين بتعدد الطرق قادح في أصول الرواية في الدين ومصادم للعقل والعادة . *المقدمة الثانية* : أن طلب التعدد ي…
In the Qur’an, the word sa‘i (سَعْي) and its related derivatives does not always literally mean “running.” In most instances, it refers more broadly to hastening or striving to do good deeds (al-mubādarah ilā al-khayr). There are, however, a few verses where sa‘i is used in the context of physically coming or moving quickly: 1. Surah Yā-Sīn, 36:20: وَجَاءَ مِنْ أَقْصَى الْمَدِينَةِ رَجُلٌ يَسْعَىٰ “And a man cam…
On the topic of AI, many have seen recently that AI companies are buying rare books to feed to their models and then they destroy the books so that anyone who wants access to that knowledge must go through them. This is also happening with Arabic texts, and it is essential that those who have the means and the know-how preserve rare books. Those who have the knowledge of what books must be purchased and preserved sho…
💯3
In his critical work al-Radd ʿalā man ittabaʿa ghayr al-madhāhib al-arbaʿa, the great scholar Ibn Rajab complains about how cunning amateurs in his time were falsely claiming to be eminent jurists and qualified to perform independent Ijtihad. But as Ibn Rajab contended, a cursory look at their actual qualifications revealed that they hardly even completed the bare basics; they were actually ignoramuses and neophyt…
💯6👎1
New motion dropped: Islam does not have clear answers on the economy, so Mamdani and Abdulrahman Mohamed El-Sayed are forced to "push forward" with the "necessary ijtihad".
🤣4🤡3
Paul Krause on the Tensions and Contradictions of the Liberal Order: "If there is a God and a Moral Order, liberalism runs into a problem. Hence the dream of a world without God, without religion, without moral demands. If group feeling outweighs individual hedonistic pleasure, liberalism runs into a problem. Hence the dream of atomistic individualism and the “freeing” of humans from all the bonds of community, trib…
قال ابن القيم: "خبر الواحد بحسب الدليل الدال عليه: ١- فتارة يجزم بكذبه لقيام دليل كذبه، ٢- وتارة يظن كذبه إذا كان دليل كذبه ظنيا ، ٣- وتارة يتوقف فيه فلا يترجح صدقه ولا كذبه إذا لم يقم دليل أحدهما ، ٤- وتارة يترجح صدقه ولا يجزم به ، ٥- وتارة يجزم بصدقه جزما لا يبقى معه شك ...
There is a distinct point where you know that you have read enough in a subject that you are researching, and you can transition from reading to writing. You can't read everything. But you have to read enough to develop a proper "feel" of the topic area you are looking at to write about it correctly and confidently. In many cases, only you can decide when exactly that threshold has been reached, and it is time to s…
❤3👍1
Ibn Taymiyyah was arrested and sentenced to prison 7 times during his life. The controversies that sparked most of his prison sentences related to some of his theological views (e.g. those espoused in his book al-Wasitiyyah), legal positions (e.g. shadd al-rihal to the grave of the Prophet 'alayhi al-Salam, divorce), and comments regarding certain personalities (e.g. Ibn 'Arabi).
👍2🤮1
They told him: "When you finally get your work published, be humble." When he finally got published:
😁2
It is often said that when the two canonical Hanbali texts, al-Muntahā and al-Iqnāʿ, differ, the ruling in al-Muntahā is always given preference. This, however, is an oversimplification. Although al-Muntahā is generally regarded as the more refined work, there are cases where the position found in al-Iqnāʿ is stronger. For example, if al-Muntahā only indicates a ruling by implication (mafhum), while al-Iqnāʿ states…
👍1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @mavahedi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 864,215 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Massoud Vahedi” (@mavahedi), 332 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mavahedi.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.