Channel
@muslimpsychologistMP
On this record: Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
4,876subscribers
+2 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001197183794 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @muslimpsychologistMP |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/muslimpsychologistMP |
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 17:39 | 4,876 | -2 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 10:48 | 4,878 | +5 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 08:32 | 4,873 | -2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 18:11 | 4,875 | +1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 15:03 | 4,874 | first reading |
32 posts held, back to 1 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 21 of 31 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 32 (1 August 2026 – 11 August 2026) |
| Views total | 14,497 |
| Reactions total | 70 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 05:10 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
70 reactions across 20 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 31 | 44.3% | |
| 💯 | 15 | 21.4% | |
| 👍 | 12 | 17.1% | |
| 😁 | 8 | 11.4% | |
| 👌 | 3 | 4.29% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 1.43% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 21 of the 32 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 70reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 32 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Healing Ourselves to Death Why the harmful rise of the Muslimah Trauma Industry risks turning healing into an identity rather than a path to spiritual growth. https://www.islam21c.com/health/healing-ourselves-to-death/
👍3❤1
No Chemical Imbalance? Tom Cruise Said It First! Back in 2005, Tom Cruise was mocked for calling out psychiatry and saying there’s no such thing as a chemical imbalance. But nearly 20 years later, it turns out he was absolutely right. Antidepressants don’t correct any proven chemical imbalance—they mask symptoms and can make people worse over time. Yet, for years, doctors have sold these drugs to people under the fa…
👍5❤3
Muslim Psychologist (MP) pinned a photo
The purpose of this Telegram Channel is to share resources on psychology, counselling, and related materials. We also share occasional musings on various topics. The materials primarily include PDF books and journal articles. We've posted around 400 books on various topics and numerous videos. We understand not everyone can go through all the books, so reading the posts, watching the videos, and occasionally reading …
💯3❤2
"Concept Creep and the Mental Health Crisis" By Nick Haslam of the Melbourne School of Psychological Sciences, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia "Many explanations have been offered for the rising prevalence of mental health complaints. I present an account that attributes some of this increase to historical changes in mental health-related concepts that are propelled by broad cultural trends.…
These two NEW studies are quite concerning. #1 shows that rates of Zoloft use in pregnancy have skyrocketed. #2 shows that Zoloft is linked to autism. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12978-026-02409-7 https://www.nature.com/articles/s41380-026-03610-7
👍1
The Prophet ﷺ therefore gives a practical solution. If a married man sees a woman and experiences sexual attraction, he should turn toward his wife and fulfil his desire lawfully. The hadith recognises human psychology rather than pretending that sexual attraction does not exist. Islam does not consider sexual desire itself evil. It provides marriage as a lawful and dignified means of fulfilling it while placing bou…
❤3
“A Woman Comes in the Form of a Devil” Question ‘Why does the Prophet ﷺ say that “a woman advances in the form of a devil and retreats in the form of a devil”? Does this mean that Islam considers women to be like devils?’ Thank you for asking this question. I want to highlight your sincere concern about following the authentic teachings of Islam and understanding them correctly. When we hear statements such as thi…
❤4
For example, the Prophet ﷺ said regarding a person who deliberately attempts to pass directly in front of someone praying: “...he is a devil.” (Muslim) This does not mean that every human being who walks in front of somebody praying has literally transformed into an actual devil. The wording describes the person's conduct and its opposition to what is spiritually appropriate in that situation. In other words, it is…
❤2
Photo, posted without a caption
💯2
Aug 3, 2026 – Harvard psychiatrist is asked in Lindsay Clancy’s murder trial how SSRIs work. Her answer essentially: depressed people lack serotonin in the brain, and SSRIs block its reuptake so there’s more available. Full quote: “[Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor. What does that mean?] So oftentimes in depression patients are kind of lacking serotonin in the spaces in their brain… a selective serotonin reupt…
👌1
Watch this short video. This is what’s wrong with much of the mental health industry. The Dr (amongst other things) doesn’t want debate but her views only to be expressed. If someone disagrees then they are committing a hate crime.
Showing the 12 most recent of 32 posts we hold for @muslimpsychologistMP. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 186,354 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Muslim Psychologist (MP)” (@muslimpsychologistMP), 4,876 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/muslimpsychologistMP.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.